Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:02:52.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Student Perception of High Fidelity Medical Simulation for an International Trauma Life Support Course

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2012

Tae Eung Kim ,
Ellen T. Reibling  and
Kent T. Denmark
Tae Eung Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California USA
Ellen T. Reibling
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California USA
Kent T. Denmark
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California USA
*
Correspondence: Tae Eung Kim, MD, FACEP Department of Emergency Medicine Loma Linda University11234 Anderson Street, A 108 Loma Linda, California 92354 USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: High fidelity medical simulators (HFMS) are accepted tools for health care instruction. The use of HFMS was incorporated into an International Trauma Life Support course, and course participants were surveyed regarding attitudes toward HFMS.

Methods: Course participants, including physicians, nurses, and prehospital personnel, were given pre- and post-course questionnaires measuring their confidence in knowledge and treatment of trauma resuscitation, as well as their attitudes towards the utility and realism of immersive simulation. The participants were randomly assigned to take a course examination either before or after their simulator session.

Results: Thirteen course participants of varying backgrounds and degrees of clinical experience were surveyed and tested. All surveyed areas improved following simulator training, including comfort level with simulation as a training method (17%), perception of the realism of HFMS (15%), and reported self-confidence in knowledge, experience and training in trauma care (27%). Test scores were improved in the post-simulation group as opposed to the pre-simulation group (86% pass rate in the post-simulation test group versus 50% pass rate in the pre-simulation test group).

Conclusions: High fidelity medical simulation was accepted by medical professionals of different backgrounds and experience. Attitudes towards simulation and self-confidence improved after simulator sessions, as did test scores, suggesting improved comprehension and retention of course materials. Further testing is required to validate the findings of this small, observational study.

Keywords

life supportmedical educationmedical simulationprehospitaltrauma
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 27 - 30
Copyright
Copyright Kim © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bond, WF, Kostenbader, M, McCarthy, JF: Prehospital and hospital-based health care providers’ experience with a human patient simulator. Prehosp Emerg Care 2001;5(3):284–287.Google Scholar
2.Barsuk, D, Ziv, A, Lin, G, et al. : Using advanced simulation for recognition and correction of gaps in airway and breathing management skills in prehospital trauma care. Anesth Analg 2005;100(3):803–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Wright, SW, Lindsell, CJ, Hinckley, WR, et al. : High fidelity medical simulation in the difficult environment of a helicopter: feasibility, self-efficacy and cost. BMC Medical Education 2006;6:49.Google Scholar