Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T11:54:21.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Market Review of Available Airway Suction Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2022

Sarah A. Johnson ,
Ryann S. Lauby ,
R. Lyle Hood ,
Robert A. De Lorenzo  and
Steven G. Schauer Open the ORCID record for Steven G. Schauer [Opens in a new window]
Sarah A. Johnson
Affiliation:
59th Medical Wing, JBSA Lackland, TexasUSA
Ryann S. Lauby
Affiliation:
59th Medical Wing, JBSA Lackland, TexasUSA
R. Lyle Hood
Affiliation:
University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TexasUSA
Robert A. De Lorenzo
Affiliation:
University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TexasUSA
Steven G. Schauer*
Affiliation:
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TexasUSA Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TexasUSA Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MarylandUSA
*
Correspondence: Steven Schauer 3698 Chambers Pass JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas78234USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Airway injuries are the second leading cause of potentially survivable battlefield death and often require airway management strategies. Airway suction, the act of using negative pressure in a patient’s upper airway, removes debris that can prevent respiration, decreases possible aspiration risks, and allows clearer viewing of the airway for intubation. The most important characteristics for a portable airway suction device for prehospital combat care are portability, strong suction, and ease of use.

Methods:

This market review searched academic papers, military publications, Google searches, and Amazon to identify devices. The search included specific characteristics that would increase the likelihood that the devices would be suitable for battlefield use including weight, size, battery life, noise emission, canister size, tubing, and suction power.

Results:

Sixty portable airway suction devices were resulted, 31 of which met inclusion criteria – 11 manually powered devices and 20 battery-operated devices. One type of manual suction pump was a bag-like design with a squeezable suction pump that was extremely lightweight but had limited suction capabilities (vacuum pressure of 100mmHg). Another type of manual suction pump had a trigger-like design which is pulled back to create suction with a firm collection canister that had increased suction capabilities (vacuum pressures of 188-600mmHg), though still less than the battery operated, and was slightly heavier (0.23-0.458kg). Battery-operated devices had increased suction capabilities and were easier to use, but they were larger and weighed more (1.18-11.0kg).

Conclusion:

Future research should work to lighten and debulk battery-operated suction devices with high suction performance.

Keywords

airwaycombatprehospitalportablesuction military
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 390 - 396
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eastridge, BJ, Mabry, RL, Seguin, P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001-2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazuchowski, EL, Kotwal, RS, Janak, JC, et al. Mortality review of US Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;88(5):686–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jain, P, Akhter, F, Schoppe, A, Hood, RL, De Lorenzo, RA. Airway clearance using suction devices in prehospital combat casualty care: a systematic review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020;35(6):676–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, MW, Han, PP, Galarneau, MR, Brigger, MT. Airway management in severe combat maxillofacial trauma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(4):532–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mabry, RL, Frankfurt, A. Advanced airway management in combat casualties by medics at the point of injury: a sub-group analysis of the reach study. J Spec Oper Med. 2011;11(2):16–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackburn, MB, April, MD, Brown, DJ, et al. Prehospital airway procedures performed in trauma patients by ground forces in Afghanistan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(1S Suppl 2):S154–S160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Lorenzo, RA, Hood, RL, Jain, P, Pescador, R, Lasch, M, Feng, Y. Final Report: Summary of Findings and Recommendations for Suction Devices for Management of Prehospital Combat Casualty Care Injuries. Fort Belvoir, Virginia USA: Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC); 2017.Google Scholar
DuCanto, J, Serrano, KD, Thompson, RJ. Novel airway training tool that simulates vomiting: suction-assisted laryngoscopy assisted decontamination (SALAD) system. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(1):117–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaither, JB, Spaite, DW, Stolz, U, Ennis, J, Mosier, J, Sakles, JJ. Prevalence of difficult airway predictors in cases of failed prehospital endotracheal intubation. J Emerg Med. 2014;47(3):294–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebesta, J. Special lessons learned from Iraq. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86(3):711–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guidelines for Medical Personnel Joint Trauma System 2019. https://learning-media.allogy.com/api/v1/pdf/40e98785-c0a1-4916-a892-ca7977355864/contents. Accessed November 2021.Google Scholar
Walrath, BD, Harper, S, Barnard, E, et al. Airway Management of Traumatic Injuries 2017. https://jts.amedd.army.mil/assets/docs/cpgs/JTS_Clinical_Practice_Guidelines_(CPGs)/Airway_Management_17_Jul_2017_ID39.pdf. Accessed November 2021.Google Scholar
Standard Medical Operating Guidelines (SMOG) for Critical Care Flight Paramedics. In: MEDEVAC USA, (ed). jts.amedd.army.mil: Joint Trauma System; 2020: 1-278.Google Scholar
Schauer, SG, Naylor, JF, Uhaa, N, April, MD, De Lorenzo, RA. An inventory of the combat medics’ aid bag. J Spec Oper Med. 2020;20(1):61–64.10.55460/FUHO-CU87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
How Google Search Works (for beginners): Google; 2021. https://developers.google.com/search/docs/beginner/how-search-works. Accessed 2021.Google Scholar
Re, B, Maio, N. How Amazon’s e-commerce works? Int J Tech Business. 2020;2(1):8–13.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, RT, Mabry, RL, De Lorenzo, RA, Butler, FK. Fundamentals of combat casualty care. In: Combat Casualty Care: Lessons Learned from OEF and OIF. Washington, DC USA: United States Department of Defense. 2012:85–120.Google Scholar
Shannon, A, Goldsmith, A. Suction devices. Anaesth Inten Care Med. 2009;10(10):468–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, BM. Airway clearance therapy in acute pediatric respiratory illness: a state-of-the-art review. S Afr J Physiother. 2019;75(1):1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couper, K, Abu Hassan, A, Ohri, V, et al; International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation B; Pediatric Life Support Task Force C. Removal of foreign body airway obstruction: a systematic review of interventions. Resuscitation. 2020;156:174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhter, F, Schoppe, A, Navarro, O, et al. Characterization of a novel emergency suction device for combat medics. J Med Devices. 2019;13(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, JF, Ritenour, AE, McLaughlin, DF, et al. Injury severity and causes of death from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom: 2003-2004 versus 2006. J Trauma. 2008;64(2 Suppl):S21–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Mabry, RL, Edens, JW, Pearse, L, Kelly, JF, Harke, H. Fatal airway injuries during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14(2):272–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotwal, RS, Montgomery, HR, Kotwal, BM, et al. Eliminating preventable death on the battlefield. Arch Surg. 2011;146(12):1350–1358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, BD, Cuniowski, PA, Muck, A, De Lorenzo, RA. Registry of emergency airways arriving at combat hospitals. J Trauma. 2008;64(6):1548–1554.Google ScholarPubMed
Le, TD, Gurney, JM, Nnamani, NS, et al. A 12-year analysis of nonbattle injury among US service members deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(9):800–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotwal, RS, Mazuchowski, EL, Janak, JC, et al. United States military fatalities during Operation New Dawn. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(2):375–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Johnson et al. supplementary material

Johnson et al. supplementary material

Download Johnson et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15.5 KB