Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:42:59.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray diffraction analysis of the cause of catalyst deactivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Vjera Novosel Radović
Affiliation:
Iron-Steel and Pipe Works, IRI, 44105 Sisak, Croatia

Abstract

After regeneration, the catalyst UOP-R-62 was used for conversion of reforming benzine. The percentage of conversion benzine fraction was considerably smaller than that of the new catalyst sample. To determine the cause of catalyst deactivation, in addition to standard methods of analysis, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy were used. Real and model samples of UOP-R-62 were analysed. Real samples were prepared with the new catalyst, a used and regenerated catalyst with good activity and a deactivated catalyst. Model samples were prepared from the new catalyst by heating at 400–1100 °C in a porcelain crucible in a muffle furnace for 1 h. Prepared samples were measured in a Philips diffractometer system and examined in a scanning electron microscope. The obtained diffractometer patterns, FWHM value of the 440 reflection of γAl2O3, electron micrographs and images of emitted characteristic X-rays were mutually compared. Only the values obtained from the deactivated catalyst differed from the others. Besides reduced broadening of the 440 line the material exhibited new X-ray diffraction lines, a change in phase composition, and modifications in morphology and microstructure. These changes are an indication that overheating of individual spheres of catalyst UOP-R-62 to a temperature of 700—1100 °C or higher caused their deactivation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, A. S., and Spackman, M. A. (1991). Acta Cryst. A 47, 1722.Google Scholar
Feachem, G., and Swallow, H. T. S. (1948). J. Chem. Soc. 267272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooksby, H. P. (1972), Oxides and Hydroxides of Alumina and Iron, edited by Brown, G. (Mineralogical Society, London), pp. 354392.Google Scholar
Saalfeld, H. (1958). Clay Min. Bull. 3, 249256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selaković, O., and Jovanović, M. (1991). Ispitivanje Porozne Strukture Katalizatora (Naftagas, Pančevo).Google Scholar
Ugarković, D. (1989). Raspodjela i Sandrzaj Prisutnih Faza Metala u R-16G (Institut za Metalurgiju, Sisak).Google Scholar
Vičević, M. (1991). PONA Analiza sa Platforming Katalizatora (INA Rafinerija nafte Rijeka, Rijeka).Google Scholar