Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:39:21.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Music video in its contexts: popular music and post-modernism in the 1980s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Will Straw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Writing on music video has had two distinctive moments in its brief history. The first wave of treatments tended to come from the culture surrounding rock music and from those who were primarily interested in music video as something which produced effects on that music. Here, two claims were most common, and generally expressed in the terms and the contexts of rock journalism:

(1) that music video had made ‘image’ more important than the experience of music itself, with effects which were to be feared (for example, the potential difficulties for artists with poor ‘images’, the risk that theatricality and spectacle would take precedence over intrinsically ‘musical’ values, etc.);

(2) that music video would result in a diminishing of the interpretative liberty of the individual music listener, who would now have visual or narrative interpretations of song lyrics imposed on him/her, in what would amount to a semantic and affective impoverishment of the popular music experience.

Type
Research Article
Information
Popular Music , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , October 1988 , pp. 247 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashley, R. and Gena, P. 1985. ‘Everything is Opera’, Formations, 2 (1, Spring), pp. 42–51Google Scholar
Billboard, 21 05 1977, ‘Platinum not enough as album sales soar’Google Scholar
Billboard, 18 06 1977, ‘And all to the good: CBS' Lundvall sees shifting US market’Google Scholar
Billboard, 14 07 1977, ‘Disco – Dearth of superstars dims industry future; producer rather than artist is star’Google Scholar
Billboard, 21 10 1978, ‘Club ability to generate sales cited as criterion for service’Google Scholar
Billboard, 10 03 1979, ‘Disco forum echoes industry's explosion’Google Scholar
Billboard, 21 02 1981, ‘AOR loses to hit radio’Google Scholar
Billboard, 14 03 1981, ‘Cable channel seen helping record sales’Google Scholar
Billboard, 22 11 1981, ‘Tightening radio playlists bring new act alternatives’Google Scholar
Billboard, 27 02 1982, ‘Left field hits are falling in as labels take them seriously’Google Scholar
Billboard, 10 07 1982, ‘Canada: Limited editions aid polygram LP sales’Google Scholar
Billboard, 8 10 1983, ‘New acts: labels play it tight’Google Scholar
Billboard, 7 01 1984 ‘Slow going for ballads: Top 40 PDs see an uptempo’Google Scholar
Billboard, 19 05 1984, ‘On target: Girls return to record stores’Google Scholar
Chang, B. G. 1986. ‘A hypothesis on the screen: MTV and/as (post-modern) signs’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10 (1, Winter), pp. 70–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. 1981. ‘Post-performancism’, Artforum XX (2, 10), pp. 31–9Google Scholar
Fiske, J. 1986. ‘MTV: Post-structural post-modern’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10 (1, Winter), pp. 74–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. 1983. Palimpsestes, ParisGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, A. 1987. ‘From anarchy to Chromakey: music, video, media’, OneTwoThreeFour: A Rock Journal Quarterly, No. 5 (Spring), pp. 16–32Google Scholar
Lawson, T. 1986. ‘Toward another Laocoon: or, the snake pit’, Artforum, XXIV (7, 03), pp. 97–106Google Scholar
Jenny, L. 1978. ‘Sémiotique du collage intertextuel’, Revue d'Esthetique, No. 3/4, p. 179Google Scholar
Scarpetta, G. 1985. L'Impureté (Paris: Grasset), p. 299Google Scholar
Straw, W. 1984. ‘Characterizing rock music cultures: the case of heavy metal’. Canadian University Music Review, No. 5, pp. 104–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, C. 1984, Le retour de la fiction (Paris: Les Editions du CERF)Google Scholar