Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T15:05:56.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisiting Forms of Representation by Critically Examining Men

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2018

Elin Bjarnegård  and
Rainbow Murray
Elin Bjarnegård
Affiliation:
Uppsala University, Sweden
Rainbow Murray
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Research on gender and politics has made use of Pitkin's (1967) distinction between descriptive, substantive, and symbolic representation to conceptualize and understand the different facets of women's underrepresentation and misrepresentation. The corresponding overrepresentation of men has seldom been explicitly recognized in this literature. We explore what the critical study of men and masculinities could contribute to the study of different forms of representation. Researching the descriptive overrepresentation of men implies recognizing male dominance and turning our attention from the factors that constrain women from entering politics to the factors that enable and reproduce men's presence. Researching the substantive representation of men also implies investigating how men represent men and identifying whether hegemonic masculinities privilege the representation of some men while neglecting others. Finally, a study of the symbolic representation of men implies identifying and describing the masculine signals and symbols that permeate political life but remain largely invisible because they constitute the political norm. Naming them as “masculine” will facilitate a gendered analysis of political institutions, practices, and discourses that are seldom questioned. We also consider the symbolic representation of men who do not conform to hegemonic masculine ideals and are not represented descriptively.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 265 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achin, Catherine, and Dorlin, Elsa. 2008. “Nicolas Sarkozy où la masculinité mascarade du Président.” Raisons Politiques 31 (3): 19–45.Google Scholar
Achin, Catherine, Dorlin, Elsa, and Rennes, Juliette. 2008. “Capital corporel identitaire et institution présidentielle: Réflextions sur les processus d'incarnation des rôles politiques.” Raisons Politiques 31 (3): 5–17.Google Scholar
Bacchi, Carol. 2009. Analysing Policy: What's the Problem Represented to Be? Frenchs Forest, New South Wales: Pearson.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy, Folke, Olle, Persson, Torsten, and Rickne, Johanna. 2017. “Gender Quotas and the Crisis of the Mediocre Man: Theory and Evidence from Sweden.” American Economic Review 107 (8): 2204–42.Google Scholar
Bjarnegård, Elin. 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, Lena Krook, Mona. 2009. “Analysing Women's Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors.” Government and Opposition 44 (2): 125–45.Google Scholar
Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly, and Langbein, Laura. 2009. “Linking Women's Descriptive and Substantive Representation in the United States.” Politics & Gender 5 (4): 491–518.Google Scholar
Hinojosa, Magda. 2012. Selecting Women, Electing Women: Political Representation and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, Meryl. 2013. Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 81–99.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, Robin M. 2010. The Art of the Gut: Manhood, Power, and Ethics in Japanese Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa, eds. 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2010. Parties, Gender Quotas, and Candidate Selection in France. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2014. “Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 520–32.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sperling, Valerie. 2015. Sex, Politics, and Putin: Political Legitimacy in Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2009. “Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (3): 407–33.Google Scholar