Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T09:19:33.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

British Antarctic Policy in the Early 20th Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Peter J. Beck
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

World War I has often been said to mark the end of the ‘Age of Imperialism’—the close of ‘that final surge of land hunger’ (Landes 1969) from 1880 to 1914 when much of the world's land surface, especially in Africa and the Pacific, was acquired by the major powers. Britain's large share was demonstrated by the predominance of red on pre-1914 maps, though in fact the British Empire achieved its greatest area after 1918; ‘… including India’, reported the 1920 Colonial Office List, ‘the Empire now extends over 11 million of square miles, or 91 times the area of the Mother Country’ (Mercer 1920). This study examines one specific part of British imperial policy in the immediate post-war years—one which, had it been fully implemented, would have increased the area by a further 40 per cent. In the view of L. S. Amery, Under-Secretary of State at the Colonial Office and one of Britain's leading politicians of the time, it was desirable that:

… the whole of the Antarctic should ultimately be included within the British Empire, and that, while the time has not yet arrived that a claim to all the continental territories should be put forward publicly, a definite and consistent policy should be followed of extending and asserting British control with the object of ultimately making it complete.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 21 , Issue 134 , May 1983 , pp. 475 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amery, L. S. 1953. My political life. 2. War and peace 1914–29. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Auburn, F. M. 1982. Antarctic law and politics, London, C. Hurst.Google Scholar
Balch, T. W. 1910. The Arctic and Antarctic regions and the law of nations. American Journal of International Law, 4: 265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. and Nicholson, D.eds. 1980. The Leo Amery diaries. I, 1896–1929. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Da Costa, J. F. 1953. La politique Australe de la France, 3. Revue d'Histoire Diplomatique, 2: 140–163.Google Scholar
Hall, W. E. 1917. A treatise on international law. London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huntford, R. 1979. Scott and Amundsen. London, Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Jackson, G. 1978. The British whaling trade. London, A. and C. Black.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. 1969. The unbound Prometheus. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Logan, H. F. M. 1979. Cold commitment: the development of New Zealand's territorial role in Antarctica 1920–1960. Christchurch, New Zealand, University of Canterbury (Unpublished MA thesis).Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. A. 1965. The stocks of whales. London, Fishing News (Books) Ltd.Google Scholar
Markham, A. 1917. The life of Sir Clements Markham. London, John Murray.Google Scholar
Marlowe, J. 1976. Milner. Apostle of empire. London, Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Mawson, D. 1915. The home of the blizzard. London, Heinemann.Google Scholar
Mawson, D. 1932–1933. Wilkes' Antarctic landfalls. Royal Geographical Society. Proceedings, South Australia Branch, 34: 70–133.Google Scholar
Mercer, W. H. 1920. Colonial Office list 1920. London, Waterlow.Google Scholar
Murray, J. 1894. The renewal of Antarctic exploration. Geographical Journal, 3: 1–27.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L. 1912. International law. A treatise. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Porter, B. 1975. The lion's share: a short history of British imperialism 1850–1970. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. B. 1939. Whale oil and other products of the whaling industry. Polar Record, 3(17): 80–86.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. B. 1958. Chronological list of Antarctic expeditions. Polar Record, 9(59): 97–134); 9(60): 191–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. F.The voyage of the Discovery. London, John Murray.Google Scholar
Skagestad, G. and Traavik, K. 1974. New problems—old solutions. Cooperation and Conflict, 9: 39–51.Google Scholar
Swan, R. A. 1961. Australia in the Antarctic. Interest, activity and endeavour. Melbourne, Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Tonnessen, J. N. 1971. Norwegian Antarctic whaling 1905–68: an historical appraisal. Polar Record, 15(96): 283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonnessen, J. N. and Johnson, A. D. 1982. The history of modem whaling. London, C. Hurst.Google Scholar
US State Department. 1924. Foreign relations of the United States. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vansittart, Lord. 1958. The mist procession. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar