Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:52:26.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uncaging Musil's Amsel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Peter West Nutting
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Few modernist short narratives achieve the richness of Robert Musil's novella “Die Amsel” (1928). The work's autobiographical elements fragment into different narrative voices whose origins remain undetermined, thus giving the writing subject latitude to participate in the ironic spectacle that he is creating. After years of silence about three decisive experiences in his life, A2, a wise fool, tells his childhood stories to his childhood friend A1 in such a way that the truth of the stories cannot be fixed and their meaning is suspended in the ongoing process of the telling. Like Ulrich, Musil's “man without qualities,” A2 has a basic need for openness and spontaneity, and his stories, with their sardonic and selfparodic accents, are playful exercises in fluid, hypothetical discourse. The blackbird that reappears in A2's third tale is the product of A2's verbal jesting at the expense of the all too serious and literal-minded A1.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 98 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 47 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bakhtin, M. M. “Discourse in the Novel.” In his The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press, 1981, 259–422.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. “Discourse Typology in Prose.” Trans. Richard Balthazar and I. R. Titunik. In Readings in Russian Poetics. Ed. Matejka, Ladislav and Pomorska, Krystyna. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1971, 176–96.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Trans. Rotsel, R. W. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ardis, 1973.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Trans. Miller, Richard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1974.Google Scholar
Baur, Uwe. “Musils Novelle ‘Die Amsel’: Figurierung der Persönlichkeitsspaltung eines Rahmenerzählers.” In Vom Törless zum Mann ohne Eigenschaften: Grazer Musil-Symposium 1972. Ed. Baur, Uwe and Musil-Studien, Dietmar Goltschnigg. 4. München: Fink, 1973, 237–92.Google Scholar
Bolte, Johannes, and Polivka, Georg. Anmerkungen zu den Kinder- und Hausmärchen der Brüder Grimm. Leipzig: Weicher, 1913.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne. The Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Burgstaller, Erich. “Zu Robert Musils ‘Amsel.‘ ” Sprachkunst 3 (1972): 268–77.Google Scholar
Eibl, Karl. “Die dritte Geschichte: Hinweise zur Struktur von Robert Musils Erzählung ‘Die Amsel.‘ ” Poetica 3 (1970): 455–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eibl, Karl. “Kommentar.” In Drei Frauen: Text, Materialien, Kommentar. By Robert Musil. München: Hanser, 1978, 95–158, 172–73.Google Scholar
Henninger, Peter. “Schreiben und Sprechen: Robert Musils Verhältnis zur Erzählform am Beispiel von Drei Frauen und ‘Die Amsel.‘” Modern Austrian Literature 9 (1976): 57–99.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. “Secrets and Narrative Sequence.” Critical Inquiry 7 (1980): 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. “From One Identity to Another.” In her Desire in Language. Ed. Roudiez, Leon S. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1980, 124–47.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. “The Ruin of a Poetics.” In Russian Formalism. Ed. Bann, Stephen and Bowlt, John E. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1973, 102–19.Google Scholar
Krotz, Frederick W. “Robert Musils ‘Die Amsel’: Novellistische Gestaltung einer Psychose.” Modern Austrian Literature 3 (1970): 7–38.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. Die Analyse der Empfindungen. 3rd ed. Jena: G. Fischer, 1902.Google Scholar
Mauch, Gudrun. “Das Märchen in Musils Erzählung ‘Die Amsel.‘” Literatur und Kritik 12 (1977): 146–66.Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul. “The Heresiarch of Meta.” PTL 3 (1978):407–27.Google Scholar
Musil, Robert. Gesammelte Werke in neun Bänden. Ed. Frisé, Adolf. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1978.Google Scholar
Musil, Robert. Tagebücher. Ed. Frisé, Adolf. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1976.Google Scholar
Roseberry, Robert L., trans. “The Blackbird.” By Robert Musil. Miscellany 7 (1972): 91–106.Google Scholar
Ryan, Judith. “The Vanishing Subject: Empirical Psychology and the Modern Novel.” PMLA 95 (1980): 857–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Hans. “Die Widerlegung der Vernunft aus dem Erlebnis oder Die Kapitulation der bürgerlichen Intelligenz vor dem Faschismus. Zu Musils ‘Amsel.‘” In Ideologiekritik im Deutschunterricht: Analysen und Modelle. Ed. Heinz, Ide et al. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg, 1972, 86–95.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, Horst. Suspensive Interpretation: Am Beispiel Franz Kafkas. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck, 1977.Google Scholar
von Wiese, Benno. “ ‘Die Amsel.‘ ” In his Die deutsche Novelle von Goethe bis Kafka: lnterpretationen. Düsseldorf: Bagel, 1962, 2:299–318.Google Scholar