Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:16:07.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Language Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Many liberals endorse an ideal of neutrality for the state when it comes to its relations with people of distinct identities. One model in the United States has been a certain understanding of the First Amendment, with its careful balancing of free exercise, on the one hand, and nonestablishment, on the other. In recent work I have defended such a liberal conception, which I call “neutrality as equal respect.” The basic idea is simple: state acts shouldn't disadvantage individuals because of their identities. This notion of neutrality might help flesh out what happens when we try to generalize the First Amendment paradigm from religious groups to identity groups more generally. One obvious test for such an analysis is to ask what help it offers us in thinking about how liberal states should treat language minorities.

Type
Little-Known Documents
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Appiah, Kwame Anthony. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2005.10.1515/9781400826193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitin, David D. Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D. Language Repertoires and State Construction in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992.10.1017/CBO9780511666759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitin, David D. Politics, Language, and Thought: The Somali Experience. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1977.Google Scholar
Charles, Taylor. Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994.Google Scholar