Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:20:26.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Our Aesthetic Categories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Sianne Ngai
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The recent turn to aesthetics in literary studies has been embraced by some of its advocates as a polemical riposte to critique: a practice increasingly attacked from multiple directions but here specifically for doing artworks the disservice of reducing them to encryptions of history or ideology. But while the new or revived focus on pleasure (and, to a much lesser extent, displeasure)1 has been vaunted for the way in which it seems to circumvent the reduction of artworks to historical or ideological concepts, our aesthetic experience is always mediated by a finite if constantly rotating repertoire of aesthetic categories. Any literary or cultural criticism purportedly engaged with aesthetics needs to pay attention to these categories, which are by definition conceptual as well as affective and tied to historically specific forms of communication and collective life. But how does one read an aesthetic category? What kind of object is it, and what methodological difficulties and satisfactions does its analysis pose?

Type
New Archives, New Aesthetics: Talks from the Convention
Information
PMLA , Volume 125 , Issue 4: Special Topic Literary Criticism for the Twenty-First Century , October 2010 , pp. 948 - 958
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Hannah, Arendt. The Human Condition. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1958. Print.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism. Trans. Harry Zohn. London: New Left, 1973. Print.Google Scholar
Pierre, Bourdieu. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Trans. Susan Emanuel. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Judith, Brown. Glamour in Six Dimensions. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Stanley, Cavell. Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge: Belknap–Harvard UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. The Truth in Painting. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Ian McLeod. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. The Aesthetic Relation. Trans. G. M. Goshgarian. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Daniel, Harris. Cute, Quaint, Hungry, and Romantic: The Aesthetics of Consumerism. New York: Da Capo, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
David, Harvey. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Robert, Henke. Performance and Literature in the Commedia dell'Arte. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Henry, James. “The Art of Fiction.” The Critical Muse: Selected Literary Criticism. New York: Penguin, 1987. 186–206. Print.Google Scholar
Fredric, Jameson. Postmodernism; or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke UP, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Immanuel, Kant. The Critique of Judgment. Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
George, Kubler. The Shape of Time. New Haven: Yale UP, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Alan, Liu. The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Sianne, Ngai. “The Cuteness of the Avant-Garde.” Critical Inquiry 31.4 (2005): 811–47. Print.Google Scholar
Sianne, Ngai. “Merely Interesting.” Critical Inquiry 34.4 (2008): 777–817. Print.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Schlegel. On the Study of Greek Poetry. Ed. and trans. Barnett, Stuart. Albany: State U of New York P, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Susan, Stewart. Poetry and the Fate of the Senses. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Kathleen M., ed. German Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: The Romantic Ironists and Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Raymond, Williams. Culture and Society, 1780–1950. New York: Columbia UP, 1983. Print.Google Scholar