Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:16:09.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linking access and benefit-sharing for crop genetic resources to climate change adaptation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2014

Tone Winge
Tone Winge*
Affiliation:
The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, PO Box 326, 1326 Lysaker, Norway
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article links the concept of access and benefit-sharing as it pertains to crop genetic resources to climate change adaptation and argues that systems for access and benefit-sharing can, and should, be designed to contribute to climate change adaptation for agriculture. The access and benefit-sharing provisions of the two international agreements that together provide the international legal framework for access and benefit-sharing – the Convention on Biological Diversity (with its Nagoya Protocol) and the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture – are presented and analysed. How these agreements are implemented is central to adaptation, as the effects of climate change threaten crop genetic resources and future adaptive capacity, and, if properly maintained and utilized, crop genetic resources will be essential to climate change adaptation across the globe. This article, therefore, argues that an important adaptation strategy linked to such implementation is to direct benefit-sharing for crop genetic resources towards adaptation efforts and to ensure facilitated and efficient access to crop genetic resources for adaptation purposes. Some options for how this can be pursued at both the international and national level are offered.

Keywords

accessadaptationbenefit-sharingclimate changeconservationConvention on Biological Diversitycrop genetic resourcesimplementationInternational Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (Plant Treaty)Nagoya Protocolutilization
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 11 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abay, F, Bjørnstad, Å and Winge, T (2013) Farmer innovation in Tigray, Ethiopia. In: Andersen, R and Winge, T (eds) Realising Farmers' Rights to Crop Genetic Resources: Success Stories and Best Practices. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 146–155.Google Scholar
Andersen, R and Winge, T (2012) The Access and Benefit-sharing Agreement on Teff Genetic Resources: Facts and Lessons. FNI Report 6/2012. Fridtjof Nansen Institute: Lysaker, Norway.Google Scholar
Andersen, R and Winge, T (2013) What constitutes a success story in the context of Farmers' Rights. In: Andersen, R and Winge, T (eds) Realising Farmers' Rights to Crop Genetic Resources: Success Stories and Best Practices. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørnstad, Å, Tekle, S and Göransson, M (2013) Facilitated access to plant genetic resources: does it work? Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60: 1959–1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, MB, Lobell, DB and Guarino, L (2009) Shifts in African crop climates by 2050, and the implications for crop improvement and genetic resources conservation. Global Environmental Change 19: 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccarelli, S, Grando, S and Winge, T (2013) Participatory barley breeding in Syria. In: Andersen, R and Winge, T (eds) Realising Farmers' Rights to Crop Genetic Resources: Success Stories and Best Practices. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Esquinas-Alcázar, J, Hilmi, A and López Noriega, I (2013) A brief history of the negotiations on the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. In: Halewood, M, López Noriega, I and Louafi, S (eds) Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 135–149.Google Scholar
FAO(2012a) Seventh Ad Hoc Advisory Committee on the Funding Strategy. IT/ACFS-7/12/Report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FAO(2012b) Design and Structure of the Third Call for Proposals. IT/ACFS-7/12/8. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FAO(2013a) Report on the First Round of the Project Cycle of the Benefit-sharing Fund. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FAO(2013b) Progress Report on the Implementation of the Second Round of the Project Cycle. IT/GB-5/13/Inf.12. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FAO(2013c) Funding Strategy for the Implementation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FAO(2013d) Draft Elements for the Mid-Term Plan of the Benefit-Sharing Fund. IT/GB-5/13/7 Add.2. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FAO(2013e) Report on the Execution of the Project Cycle of the Benefit-sharing Fund since the Fourth Session of the Governing Body. IT/GB-5/13/8. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT(2013) Food and Agricultural commodities production – Top production – World – 2011. Available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx (accessed accessed 15 November 2013).Google Scholar
Fowler, C (2001) Protecting farmer innovation: the Convention on Biological Diversity and the question of origin. Jurimetrics 41: 477–488.Google Scholar
Gepts, P (2006) Plant genetic resources conservation and utilization: the accomplishments and future of a societal insurance policy. Crop Science 46: 2278–2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Crop Diversity Trust (2013) Fund Disbursement Strategy. Available at http://www.croptrust.org/documents/WebPDF/GCDT%20Fund%20Disbursement%20Strategy%20FINAL.pdf (accessed accessed 18 December 2013).Google Scholar
Halewood, M, López Noriega, I and Louafi, S (2013) The global crop commons and access and benefit-sharing laws: examining the limits of international policy support for the collective pooling and management of plant genetic resources. In: Halewood, M, López Noriega, I and Louafi, S (eds) Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Haussmann, BIG, Traoré, PSC, Rattunde, HF, Weltzien-Rattunde, E, vom Brocke, K and Parzies, HK (2012) Breeding strategies for adaptation of pearl millet and sorghum to climate variability in West Africa. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 198: 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawtin, G, Moreno, RA, Swaminathan, MS, Pillai, BRS and Hegwood, D (2010) Expert Advice on the Second Call for Proposals, Including a Strategy and Programme for the Benefit-Sharing Fund. London: Secretariat of the Plant Treaty.Google Scholar
IISD Reporting Services(2014) Summary of the third meeting of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing to the Convention on Biological Diversity: 24–28 February 2014. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9: 1–14.Google Scholar
IPCC(2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Core Writing Team, , Pachauri, RK and Reisinger, A (eds)). Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
IPCC(2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Stocker, TF, Qin, D and Plattner, G-K et al. (eds)). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC(2014) Chapter 7. Food security and food production systems. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. IPCC Working Group II Contribution to AR5. Accepted Final Draft released online in unedited form. Available at http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Chap7_FGDall.pdf (accessed accessed 31 March 2014).Google Scholar
Jarvis, A, Lane, A and Hijmans, RJ (2008) The effect of climate change on crop wild relatives. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 126: 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jump, AS and Peñuelas, J (2005) Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecology Letters 8: 1010–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jump, AS, Marchant, R and Peñuelas, J (2008) Environmental change and the option value of genetic diversity. Trends in Plant Science 14: 51–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, A and Jarvis, A (2007) Changes in climate will modify the geography of crop suitability: agricultural biodiversity can help with adaptation. SAT eJournal 4: 1–12.Google Scholar
Lobell, DB, Burke, MB, Tebaldi, C, Mastrandrea, MD, Falcon, WP and Naylor, RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319: 607–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marrero-Girona, G and Vogel, JH (2012) Can “monkey business” resolve the most contentious issue in the Convention on Biological Diversity? International Journal of Psychological Studies 4: 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, KL and Perales, HR (2010) Evolutionary response of landraces to climate change in centers of crop diversity. Evolutionary Applications 3: 480–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moeller, NI, and Stannard, C (eds) (2013) Identifying Benefit Flows: Studies on the Potential Monetary and Non-monetary Benefits Arising from the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Noriega, IL, Wambugu, P and Mejías, A (2013) Assessment of progress to make the Multilateral System Functional. Incentives and challenges at the country level. In: Halewood, M, López Noriega, I and Louafi, S (eds) Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 199–225.Google Scholar
Ortiz, R, Sayre, KD, Govaerts, B, Gupta, R, Subbarao, GV, Ban, T, Hodson, D, Dixon, JM, Ortiz-Monasterio, JI and Reynolds, M (2008) Climate change: can wheat beat the heat? Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 126: 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padulosi, S, Heywood, V, Hunter, D and Jarvis, A (2011) Underutilized species and climate change: current status and outlook. In: Yadav, SS, Redden, RJ, Hatfield, JL, Lotze-Campen, H and Hall, AE (eds) Crop Adaptation to Climate Change. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant Treaty(2013) Call for Proposals 2010–2011. Available at http://www.planttreaty.org/content/call-proposals-2010-2011 (accessed accessed 16 December 2013).Google Scholar
Plant Treaty(2014a) Collections in the Multilateral System. Available at http://planttreaty.org/inclusions?field_mls_noti_inclu_type_owner_value_many_to_one = Contracting+Party (accessed accessed 10 February 2014).Google Scholar
Plant Treaty (2014b) Third call for proposals. Benefit-sharing fund of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/ag/agp/planttreaty/funding/call2014/cfp_3_2014_0_en.pdf (accessed accessed 10 March 2014).Google Scholar
Ramirez, M, Ortiz, R, Taba, S, Sebastián, L, Peralta, E, Williams, DE, Ebert, AW and Vézina, A (2013) Demonstrating interdependence on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. In: Halewood, M, López Noriega, I and Louafi, S (eds) Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 39–61.Google Scholar
Ramirez-Villegas, J, Jarvis, A, Fujisaka, S, Hanson, J and Leibing, C (2013) Crop and forage genetic resources: international interdependence in the face of climate change. In: Halewood, M, López Noriega, I and Louafi, S (eds) Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 78–98.Google Scholar
Snook, LK, Dulloo, ME, Jarvis, A, Scheldeman, X and Kneller, M (2011) Crop germplasm diversity: the role of gene bank collections in facilitating adaptation to climate change. In: Yadav, SS, Redden, RJ, Hatfield, JL, Lotze-Campen, H and Hall, AE (eds) Crop Adaptation to Climate Change. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stannard, C (2013) The multilateral system of access and benefit sharing: could it have been constructed another way. In: Halewood, M, López Noriega, I and Louafi, S (eds) Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 243–264.Google Scholar
Stannard, C, Caracciolo, F and Hillery, P (2013) Modelling payments to the Benefit-sharing Fund. In: Moeller, NI and Stannard, C (eds) Identifying Benefit Flows: Studies on the Potential Monetary and Non-monetary Benefits Arising from the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, pp. 117–158.Google Scholar
Sthapit, B, Padulosi, S and Mal, B (2009) Role of on-farm/in situ conservation and underutilized crops in the wake of climate change. Paper presented at the National Symposium on Recent Global Developments in the Management of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, 17–18 December 2009. Available at http://www.bioversityinternational.org/uploads/tx_news/Role_of_on-farm_In_situ_conservation_and_underutilized_crops_in_the_wake_of_climate_1397.pdf (accessed accessed 05 February 2014).Google Scholar
Trethowan, RM, Turner, MA and Chatta, TM (2010) Breeding strategies to adapt crops to a changing climate. Advances in Global Change Research 37: 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, NC and Meyer, R (2011) Synthesis of regional impacts and global agricultural adjustments. In: Yadav, SS, Redden, RJ, Hatfield, JL, Lotze-Campen, H and Hall, AE (eds) Crop Adaptation to Climate Change. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNEP (2013) Report of the expert meeting on Article 10 of the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing. 19 September 2013. UNEP/CBD/ABSEM-A10/1/3. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/abs/absem-a10-01/official/absem-a10-01-03-en.pdf (accessed August 2014).Google Scholar
Visser, B (2013) The moving scope of Annex 1: the list of crops covered under the multilateral system. In: Halewood, M, López Noriega, I and Louafi, S (eds) Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 265–282.Google Scholar
Winge, T and Groome, H (2013) Conservation of local varieties in the Basque country in spite of legal restrictions. In: Andersen, R and Winge, T (eds) Realising Farmers' Rights to Crop Genetic Resources: Success Stories and Best Practices. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 40–53.Google Scholar