Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:43:03.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A diachronic account of phonological unnaturalness*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2012

Sverre Stausland Johnsen
Sverre Stausland Johnsen*
Affiliation:
University of Oslo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Norwegian retroflexion exhibits some phonetic properties that do not seem to ‘make sense’. In Standard East Norwegian, an alveolar /ɾ/ causes a following alveolar coronal to become postalveolar, and in the Frogner and Arendal dialects of Norwegian, the same postalveolarisation process is triggered by a uvular /ʁ/. Comparative analyses of Norwegian dialects reveal that these properties are the results of historical changes and phonological diffusion across dialects. Theories attempting to analyse Norwegian retroflexion as phonetically ‘natural’ can neither fully account for these properties of Norwegian retroflexion nor capture the typological generalisations found across Norwegian dialects.

Type
Research Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , December 2012 , pp. 505 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Parts of this work were presented at BLS 37, the 85th Annual Meeting of the LSA and the MIT Phonology Circle. I am grateful to the audience at these events for their comments and feedback. Earlier versions of this paper have also greatly benefited from comments and criticism from Adam Albright, Michael Becker, the editors of Phonology and three anonymous reviewers. I wish to thank Arne Torp for conducting the recording session with the speaker of the Frogner dialect on my behalf, and, finally, I am grateful to the dialect speakers consulted in this paper for letting me probe and record their phonological production.

References

REFERENCES

Aasen, Ivar (1848). Det norske Folkesprogs Grammatik. Kristiania: Werner.Google Scholar
Aasen, Ivar (1864). Norsk Grammatik. Revised edition of Det norske Folkesprogs Grammatik. Christiania: P. T. Mallings Forlagsboghandel.Google Scholar
Alnæs, Ivar (1910). Norsk uttaleordbok. Kristiania: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Anderson, Victoria (1997). The perception of coronals in Western Arrernte. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1997). Rhodes, Greece. Vol. 1. 389–392. http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/eurospeech_1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan (2006). Strength and weakness at the interface: positional neutralization in phonetics and phonology. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baroni, Marco (2001). How do languages get crazy constraints? Phonetically-based phonology and the evolution of the Galeata Romagnolo vowel system. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 7: Papers in Phonology 5. 152–178.Google Scholar
Beito, Olav T. (1958). Valdres-målet. In Hermundstad, Knut (ed.) Valdres bygdebok. Vol. 2: Natur, oldtid, målføre, gardsnamn og folk. Leira: Valdres Bygdeboknemnds Forlag. 233–298.Google Scholar
Bjerkeset, Rolf (1976). Bolsøymålet: ei synkron framstilling av foneminventaret med ei geografisk-historisk og målgeografisk innleiing. Hovudoppgåve, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (1997). Rules in Optimality Theory: two case studies. In Roca, Iggy (ed.) Derivations and constraints in phonology. Oxford: Clarendon. 227–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2008). Natural and unnatural sound patterns: a pocket field guide. In Willems, Klaas & Cuypere, Ludovic De (eds.) Naturalness and iconicity in language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgstrøm, Carl H. (1958). Innføring i sprogvidenskap. 2nd revised edn 1973. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Bradley, Travis G. (2007). Morphological derived-environment effects in gestural coordination: a case study of Norwegian clusters. Lingua 117. 950–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brekke, K. (1881). Bidrag til dansk-norskens lydlære. In Indbydelsesskrift til den offentlige examen i juni og juli 1881 ved Aars og Voss's latin- og realskole. Kristiania: W. C. Fabritius. 1–66.Google Scholar
Brekke, Olga (2000). Saltendialekten: en grammatikk. Fauske: Skjerstad og Fauske Bygdeboknemnd.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene (2000). On the naturalness of unnatural rules. UCSB Working Papers in Linguistics 9. 16–29.Google Scholar
Bull, Trygve (1980). Språket i Oslo. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.Google Scholar
Bye, Dagfinn Olav (1979). Froværingsmålet: ordtilfang fra fiskebåter og fiskebruk. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Hallfrid (1933). Gimsøy-målet: fonologi og orddannelse. Oslo: Jacob Dybwad.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pretorius, Rigardt (2010). Phonetically grounded phonology and sound change: the case of Tswana labial plosives. JPh 38. 404–421.Google Scholar
Dalen, Arnold (1970). Målføret. In Leirfall, Jon (ed.) Liv og lagnad i stjørdalsbygdene. Vol. 1.1 of Stjørdalsboka. Stjørdal og Meråker. 148–166.Google Scholar
Dalen, Arnold (1985). Skognamålet: ein fonologisk analyse. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Dolbey, Andrew E. & Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (1999). The source of naturalness in synchronic phonology. CLS 35:1. 59–69.Google Scholar
Donali, Ingeborg (1988). Oppdaling: ord og uttrykk. Trondheim: Strindheim Trykkeris Forlag.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia J. & Stampe, David (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Dinnsen, Daniel A. (ed.) Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 126–173.Google Scholar
Eliasson, Stig (1986). Sandhi in Peninsular Scandinavian. In Andersen, Henning (ed.) Sandhi phenomena in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elstad, Kåre (1982). Borgfjerdingsmål. 2 vols. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Endresen, Rolf Theil (1974). On retroflex segments in Norwegian. Norwegian Journal of Linguistics 28. 73–78.Google Scholar
Endresen, Rolf Theil (1985). Norske konsonantar: fonetiske og fonologiske merknader. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 3. 65–100.Google Scholar
Endresen, Rolf Theil (1991). Fonetikk og fonologi: ei elementær innføring. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Engen, Brynhild (1975). Vega-målet: eit oversyn med hovudvekt på kvantitet og klusilar – ei synkronisk og diakronisk gransking. Hovudfagsoppgåve, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Engen, Brynhild (1977). Vegamålet. Mosjøen: Helgeland Arbeiderblad.Google Scholar
Engstrand, Olle, Frid, Johan & Lindblom, Björn (2007). A perceptual bridge between coronal and dorsal /r/. In Solé, Maria-Josep, Beddor, Patrice Speeter & Ohala, Manjari (eds.) Experimental approaches to phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje (1974). Some remarks on the phonological status of retroflex flap in Eastern Norwegian. Oslo Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 1–6.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (2001). Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology 18. 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Edward (2002). Auditory representations in phonology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (2003). The relationship between coronal place and vowel backness. Phonology 20. 335–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Edward (2004). Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness. In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.) Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 232–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foldvik, Arne Kjell (1988). Spredning av skarring i Norge i løpet av om lag 70 år. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 6. 55–61.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.) (1985). Phonetic linguistics: essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew & Blevins, Juliette (2009). Analogical morphophonology. In Hanson, Kristin & Inkelas, Sharon (eds.) The nature of the word: studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 527–545.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark (2000). Marshallese phonology, the phonetics–phonology interface and historical linguistics. The Linguistic Review 17. 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark (2007). Historical linguistics: theory and method. Malden, Mass.:Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark, Kissock, Madelyn & Reiss, Charles (2007). Microvariation, variation, and the features of universal grammar. Lingua 117. 645–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Silke (2003). The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Philip J. (1996). Phonetic constraints and markedness in the phonotactics of Australian aboriginal languages. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Eskil (1985). Om artikulasjonen av konsonantar i ein nordnorsk dialekt. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 3. 9–26.Google Scholar
Hatlebrekke, Hildur (1976). Språkforhold i Vadsø by med særlig vekt på sterke verb. Hovedfagsoppgave, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Hatlebrekke, Hildur (1981). Vadsø-dialekten med glimt fra dialektene i Kiby og Ekkerøy. Vadsø: Varanger Mållag.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar (1982). Oppdalsmålet: innføring i et sørtrøndsk fjellbygdmål. Oslo: Tanum-Norli.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1999). Phonetically driven phonology: the role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In Darnell, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith, Newmeyer, Frederick, Noonan, Michael & Wheatley, Kathleen (eds.) Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Vol. 1: General papers. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 243–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hødnebø, Finn (2005). Risør bymål: hovedoppgave i norsk høsten 1948. Risør: Søndeled og Risør Historielag.Google Scholar
Hoff, Ingeborg (1949). Numedalsmålet: stutt umrit av ljod- og formlære. Oslo: Jacob Dybwad.Google Scholar
Hoff, Ingeborg (1978). Regressiv og progressiv konsonantassimilasjon i norsk: kronologisk utsyn. In Hoff, Ingeborg (ed.) På leit etter ord: heidersskrift til Inger Frøyset frå medarbeidarar og studentar. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. 117–163.Google Scholar
Holen, Sigvald (1929). Ljodverket og verbalbøygninga (linne vb. og sterke vb. 1.–3. kl.) i vegårsheimålføret, med 2 målprøver. Hovudfagsavhandling, Royal Frederick University.Google Scholar
Holten, Ola J. (1974). Dativbruken i surnadalsmålet, med generelt utsyn over det nordiske dativområdet. Hovudfagsoppgåve, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hovdenak, Marit (1978). Noko om språkforholda i ei romsdalsbygd. Hovudoppgåve, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even (1969). Transformasjonell generativ grammatikk: annen utgave med øvelser. 2nd edn 1971. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2001). On the limits of phonetic determinism in phonology: *NC revisited. In Hume, Elizabeth & Johnson, Keith (eds.) The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press. 141–185.Google Scholar
Ingebrigtsen, Vidar O. (1942). Verbalbøyningen i Bjarkøy-målet. Hovedoppgave, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
IPA handbook (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: a guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Harald M. (1976). Generasjonsskilnader i verdalsmålet. Hovedoppgave, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Iversen, Ragnvald (1913). Senjen-maalet: lydverket i hoveddrag. Kristiania: Jacob Dybwad.Google Scholar
Jahr, Ernst Håkon (1981). L-fonema i Oslo bymål. In Jahr, Ernst Håkon & Lorentz, Ove (eds.) Fonologi/Phonology. Oslo: Novus. 328–344.Google Scholar
Jenstad, Tor Erik (1985). Sunndalsmålet: eit grensemål på indre Nordmøre. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Johnson, Lawrence (1973). Dissimilation as a natural process in phonology. Stanford Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3. 45–56.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W., Smolensky, Paul, Arnold, Karen & Moreton, Elliott (2003). Acquisition of nasal place assimilation by 4.5-month-old infants. In Houston, Derek, Seidl, Amanda, Hollich, George J., Johnson, Elisabeth & Jusczyk, Ann Marie (eds.) Jusczyk lab final report. Available (October 2012) at http://hincapie.psych.purdue.edu/Jusczyk/pdf/Nasal.pdf.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto (2008). Phonetic naturalness and unnaturalness in Japanese loanword phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17. 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. (1985). Universal phonetics and the organization of grammars. InFromkin (1985). 115–132.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael J. & Kisseberth, Charles W. (1977). Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Killingbergtrø, Laurits (1981). Leksvikdialekten. In Steen, Asbjørn (ed.) Leksvik bygdabok: kulturbind I. Leksvik Bygdaboknemnd. 20–57.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (2008). Universals constrain change; change results in typological generalizations. In Good, Jeff (ed.) Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, Ragnhild L. (2006). An articulatory description of the liquids of Urban East Norwegian, based on EPG and EMA. MA thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, Gjert (1980). Dialektutvikling hos skolebarn: en undersøkelse av forbindelser av vokal + r i talemålet til skolebarn i Arendal. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, Gjert (2000). The phonology of Norwegian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Li-Jen (2009). The role of natural class features in the acquisition of phonotactic regularities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 38. 129–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, Amund B. (1891). Indberetning fra adjunkt Amund B. Larsen om reiser foretagne med offentligt stipendium i årene 1888–90 for at studere bygdemålene i Kristianssands stift. Universitets- og skole-annaler (ny række) 6. 209–260.Google Scholar
Larsen, Amund B. (1897). Oversigt over de norske bygdemål. Kristiania: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Larsen, Amund B. (1907). Kristiania bymål: vulgærsproget med henblik på den utvungne dagligtale. Kristiania: Cammermeyers Boghandel.Google Scholar
Larsen, Amund B. (1908). Selbygmålets lydlære. Norvegia 2. 8–22, 83–98, 155–189, 235–247.Google Scholar
Lindau, Mona (1985). The story of /r/. InFromkin (1985). 157–168.Google Scholar
Martinussen, Bente (1984). Verbalsystemet i Andørja-målet: ein synkron analyse med eit oversyn over lydverket. Hovudoppgåve, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Mathisen, Inger Marie (1979). Ein synkron analyse av bøyinga av verb og substantiv i rødøyfjerdingsmålet med eit kort oversyn over lydverket. Hovudoppgåve, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Midtsian, Eilif Bjørgvin (1951). Frøyværingsmålet. Et fosenmål. Lydverket. Hovedoppgave, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff (2008). The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, Eilert (1922). Todalsmålet (Nordmøre). Oslo: Studentmållaget.Google Scholar
Moen, Inger & Simonsen, Hanne Gram (2011). The Norwegian retroflex fricative. In Lee, Wai-Sum & Zee, Eric (eds.) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong 2011. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong. 1398–1401.Google Scholar
Moen, Inger, Simonsen, Hanne Gram, Lindstad, Arne Martinus & Cowen, Steve (2003). The articulation of the East Norwegian apical liquids /ɭ ɾ ɽ/. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Productions. 1755–1758.Google Scholar
Moen, Torgeir Kals (2001). ‘De gå jo øståvæ da’: om utvikling og variasjon i talemålet til yngre språkbrukere i Tvedestrand. Hovedfagsoppgave, Agder University College.Google Scholar
Næs, Olav (1979). Norsk grammatikk: elementære strukturer og syntaks. Oslo: Fabritius forlag.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Niels Åge (1950). Om bagtunge-r'ets opkomst i dansk. Sprog og kultur 18. 58–64.Google Scholar
Nyjordet, Bjørg M. (2006). Grimstad: skarre-r-ens første tilbakeslag? Målbryting 8. 105–116.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1971). The role of physiological and acoustic models in explaining the direction of sound change. Project on Linguistics Analysis 15. 25–40.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1972). How to represent natural sound patterns. Project on Linguistics Analysis 16. 40–57.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1974). Phonetic explanation in phonology. CLS 10:2. 251–274.Google Scholar
Olssen, Olaf (1958). Brønnøymålet: lydverket. Oslo: A/S Bokcentralen.Google Scholar
Papazian, Eric (1977). Om ‘tjukk l’ og andre rare lyder. Norskrift 14. 1–56.Google Scholar
Papazian, Eric (2002). Skarring i Oslo, og skarre-/r/ og retroflekser. Målbryting 6. 121–130.Google Scholar
Paulsen, Kjell-Arthur (1971). Litt om det norske språket i Öst-Finnmark tidligere og i dag: kort oversikt over lydverk og formverk i Sör-Varanger-dialekten. Hovedoppgave, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. (1968). Aspects of phonological theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pycha, Anne, Nowak, Pawel, Shin, Eurie & Shosted, Ryan (2003). Phonological rule-learning and its implications for a theory of vowel harmony. WCCFL 22. 423–435.Google Scholar
Pycha, Anne, Shin, Eurie & Shosted, Ryan (2006). Directionality of assimilation in consonant clusters: an experimental approach. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report. 152–166.Google Scholar
Reitan, Jørg. (1906). Aalens maalføre: kort fremstilling av lydlæren med oversigt over ordenes bøining. Christiania: Jacob Dybwad.Google Scholar
Riksheim, Vilhjelm (1921). Ljodvokstren i Vefsn-målet (Ner-Vefsn). Kristiania: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Rypdal, Hans (1929). Romsdalsmål (Tresfjorden). Oslo: Olaf Norli.Google Scholar
Saffran, Jenny R. & Thiessen, Erik D. (2003). Pattern induction by infant language learners. Developmental Psychology 39. 484–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandøy, Helge (1982). Romsdalsmålet: skisse til ein grammatikk. Bergen: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Sandøy, Helge (1993). Talemål. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Schane, Sanford A. (1972). Natural rules in phonology. In Stockwell, Robert P. & Macaulay, Ronald K. S. (eds.) Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 199–229.Google Scholar
Schane, Sanford A. (1973). Generative phonology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schane, Sanford A., Tranel, Bernard & Lane, Harlan (1974–75). On the psychological reality of a natural rule of syllable structure. Cognition 3. 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, Amanda & Buckley, Eugene (2005). On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development 1. 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seip, Didrik Arup (1955). Norsk språkhistorie til omkring 1370. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Simonsen, Hanne Gram & Moen, Inger (2004). On the distinction between Norwegian /ʃ/ and /ç/ from a phonetic perspective. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 18. 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, Hanne Gram, Moen, Inger & Cowen, Steve (2008). Norwegian retroflex stops in a cross linguistic perspective. JPh 36. 385–405.Google Scholar
Skånlund, Einar B. (1933). Saltamålet: kort oversikt over lydverket. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Skjekkeland, Martin (1980). Bø-målet i går og i dag: rapport frå ei språkgeografisk og språksosiologisk gransking. Bø: Telemark Distriktshøgskole.Google Scholar
Skoruppa, Katrin & Peperkamp, Sharon (2011). Adaptation to novel accents: feature-based learning of context-sensitive phonological regularities. Cognitive Science 35. 348–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solé, Maria-Josep, Hyman, Larry M. & Monaka, Kemmonye C. (2010). More on post-nasal devoicing: the case of Shekgalagari. JPh 38. 604–615.Google Scholar
Sørlie, Mikjel (1943). Hedalsmålet: stutt utsyn over lyd- og formlæra med ei ordsamling. Bergen: John Griegs Forlag.Google Scholar
Stausland Johnsen, Sverre (2012). Variation in Norwegian retroflexion. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35.Google Scholar
Stausland Johnsen, Sverre (in press). The articulation of Norwegian retroflexes. JPh.Google Scholar
Steblin-Kamenskij, M. I. (1965). Om alveolarer og kakuminaler i norsk og svensk. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 20. 18–27.Google Scholar
Stemshaug, Ola (1968). Meldalsmålet. In Havdal, Olaf (ed.) Meldal bygdebok. Vol. 1: Bygdesoga til ikring 1700: frå åndsliv og kulturarbeid gjennom tida. I. Meldal: Meldal Kommune. 395–442.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. & Blumstein, Sheila E. (1975). Quantal aspects of consonant production and perception: a study of retroflex stop consonants. JPh 3. 215–233.Google Scholar
Storm, Joh. (1884). Norsk Lydskrift med Omrids af Fonetiken. Part 1. Norvegia 1. 19–132.Google Scholar
Tømmerås, Nils-Helge (1964). Substantivene i trondenesmålet: en oversikt over fonologi, ordlaging og morfologi. Hovedoppgave, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Torp, Arne (1983). Nokre tankar om inndeling av folkemålet i Skandinavia. Folkmålsstudier 28. 45–92.Google Scholar
Torp, Arne (1986). Landvikmålet: eit norsk skagerakmål. Grimstad: Landvik Historielag.Google Scholar
Torp, Arne (1994). Skarre-r mot retrofleksar: ein rapport frå frontlinja. In Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt & Helgander, John (eds.) Dialektkontakt, språkkontakt och språkförändring i Norden: föredrag från ett forskarsymposium. Stockholm: University of Stockholm. 291–299.Google Scholar
Torp, Arne (2005). Gjerstadmålet. Sundebru: Gjerstad Historielag.Google Scholar
Uffmann, Christian (2007). Intrusive [r] and optimal epenthetic consonants. Language Sciences 29. 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanvik, Arne (1972). A phonetic–phonemic analysis of Standard East Norwegian. Part 1. Norwegian Journal of Linguistics 26. 119–164.Google Scholar
Vintermyr, Erik Johannes (1983). Stedsnavn fra Ytre Søndeled. Hovedoppgave, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Voss, Fridtjof (1940). Arendals bymål: lydlære og formlære. Maal og Minne 1940. 49–101.Google Scholar
Western, Aug. (1889). Kurze darstellung des norwegischen lautsystems. Phonetische Studien 2. 259–282.Google Scholar
Wetås, Åse (2011). Norsk ordbok og NO 2014-prosjektet. In Jenstad, Tor Erik & Vikør, Lars S. (eds.) Leksikalsk forsking i norske målføre og nynorsk skriftspråk. Trondheim: Tapir Aademisk Forlag. 65–84.Google Scholar
Wilson, Colin (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30. 945–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winje, Karen Marie (1994). Stadnamn frå sørlege del av Vegårshei. Hovudfagsoppgåve, University of Bergen.Google Scholar