Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:01:40.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deceptions? Assertions? or Second-string Verbiage?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

John King-Farlow
John King-Farlow
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 56 , Issue 215 , January 1981 , pp. 100 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 King-Farlow, John, ‘Self-Deceivers and Sartrean Seducers’, Analysis 24, No. 5 (1963), 131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Critical Notice of Fingarette's, HerbertSelf-Deception in Metaphilosophy 4, No. 1 (1973), 76–84Google Scholar; ‘Foi, Bonne, Foi, Mauvaise, Sincérité et Espoir’, Dialogue 12, No. 3 (1973), 502–514Google Scholar; ‘Philosophical Nationalism: Self-Deception and Self-Direction’, Dialogue 17, No. 4 (1978), 591–615.

2 Searle, John R., Speech Acts (Cambridge: CUP, 1969), Chapter Six, especially Part 3, pp. 141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 For typically confused and unhelpful uses of asterisking by linguists, see my ‘Pronouns, Primacy and Falsification in Linguistics’, Philosophy of Social Science 3, No. 1 (1973), 41–61.

4 Compare again the four papers cited in footnote 1.