Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:53:52.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observational Invariance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Carl R. Kordig
Carl R. Kordig*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 1973 , pp. 558 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Gale, G. and Walter, E. “Kordig and the Theory-Ladenness of Observation.” Philosophy of Science 40 (1973): 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Hanson, N. R. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
[3] Kordig, C. R. “The Theory-Ladenness of Observation.” Review of Metaphysics 24 (1971): 448–484.Google Scholar
[4] Kordig, C. R. “The Comparability of Scientific Theories.” Philosophy of Science 38 (1971): 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Kordig, C. R. The Justification of Scientific Change. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Margenau, H. The Nature of Physical Reality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.Google Scholar
[7] Margenau, H. Open Vistas. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
[8] Margenau, H. “What is a Theory?” in The Structure of Economic Science. Edited by Krupp, S. R. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1966. Pages 25–38.Google Scholar
[9] Polanyi, M. Personal Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.Google Scholar
[10] Scheffler, I. Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967.Google Scholar