Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:36:36.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduction and Ontological Unification: Reply to McCauley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Robert L. Causey
Robert L. Causey*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 228 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I wish to thank Dr. McCauley for the extensive study and careful attention he has devoted to my work on reduction and unification. I also thank the Editor-in-Chief for this opportunity to express my position in this reply.

References

Causey, R. L. (1977), Unity of Science. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, R. N. (1981), “Hypothetical Identities and Ontological Economizing: Comments on Causey's Program for the Unity of Science”, Philosophy of Science, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar