Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:58:21.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ecology of the sheep tick, Ixodes ricinus L. Host availability and seasonal activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. Milne
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, King's College, Newcastle-on-Tyne

Extract

In three experiments, the chief hosts, sheep, were withheld from a grazing until 0–3 weeks after the normal spring peak of female tick activity. This did not give rise to any appreciable prolongation of female tick activity into the normal summer offseason. More than half the female ticks actually available during the entire spring season were unfed when activity came to an end. This was due to the withholding of hosts. Hence that aspect of the ‘two-brood’ theory which claims that activity ends in spring, because all the available ticks are fed, is untenable as the complete explanation of bimodal annual activity.

Increase in sheep-stocking density, over the normal for a grazing, lowers the average infestation per sheep for that season at least.

The experimental data suggests the following:

(i) Delay in stocking a grazing with sheep results in a slightly higher-than-normal population of active female ticks which is fairly quickly absorbed after reintroduction of sheep.

(ii) A varying proportion of the tick population becomes active each week throughout the tick season, increasing up to the peak and decreasing thereafter.

(iii) The average duration of individual activity in a natural population of female ticks is probably not more than 1 month, perhaps less.

Practical applications of the findings to hill sheep farming are indicated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

MacLeod, J. (1932). Parasitology, 24, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1939). Bull. Ent. Res. 30, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, A. (1943). Ann. Appl. Biol. 30, 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, A. (1945). Parasitology, 36, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, C. B. (1937). Reprint No. 1794 Public Health Reports, U. S. Treasury Dept. 52, 16.Google Scholar
Wheler, E. G.(1899). Proc. R. Agric. Soc. Engl. 4, 626.Google Scholar