Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:30:47.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Localizing Legitimation: Bargaining Through the Law in a Provincial Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Leslie P. Peirce
Leslie P. Peirce*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Processes of legitimation in the Ottoman Empire are usually approached from the center-from the perspective of the dynasty, the entity assumed to be seeking legitimacy. This essay approaches the question of law and legitimacy in the Ottoman polity from a provincial vantage point, the province of Aintab, which took its name from its capital city (today's Gaziantep). It also examines the question of legitimation at a particular moment, from September 1540 to September 1541, the period encompassed by the first two extant registers of the court of Aintab available to researchers. In this microstudy of the events of a single year, I treat mid-sixteenth-century Aintab as a laboratory for examining the extent to which legal discourse furthered the process of legitimation, and the ways in which the two were related at the grassroots level. I argue that law broadly construed was a field of negotiation through which the constituent elements of legitimacy were debated and defined. This negotiation was a reciprocal process in which both province and dynasty aimed to establish legitimacy in each other's eyes-that is, they aimed to establish rightful claims over the control of local society and local resources. As the principal site of this process at the grassroots level, the local court provided a venue where this contest for control was articulated in what might be called a civil discourse of legitimation.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 24 , Spring 2001 , pp. 17 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbir, Karl. 19801. Ottoman Rule in Damascus, 1708-1758. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barkan, Ömer Lutfi. 1943. XV ve XVIıncı Asırlarda Osmanlı İmparatorluğunda Zirai Ekonominin Hukuki ve Mali Esasları, c. 1: Kanunlar, Istanbul: Burhaneddin Erenler Matbaası.Google Scholar
Darling, Linda. 1996. Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy: Tax Collection and Finance Administration in the Ottoman Empire 1560-1660. Leiden, New York, and Köln: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergenç, Özer. 1981. “Osmanlı Şehirlerindeki Yönetim Kurumlarının Niteliği Üzerinde Bazı Düşünceler,” pp. 1265-74 in VIII. Türk Tarihi Kongresi. Kongreye Sunulan Bildiriler 2. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.Google Scholar
Ergenç, Özer 1982. “Osmanlı Klasik Dönemindeki ‘Eşraf ve A’yan’ Üzerine Bazı Bilgiler,” Osmanlı Araştırmaları 3, pp. 105-13.Google Scholar
Faroqhi, Suraiya. 1987. “The Venetian Presence in the Ottoman Empire, 1600-1630,” in The Ottoman Empire and the World Economy, ed. Islamoglu-Inan, Huri. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Haim. 1986. “Jewish Tax-Farmers in the Ottoman Empire in the 16th and 17th Centuries,” Journal of Turkish Studies 10, pp. 143-54.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. n.d. “Hawacla.” Encyclopedia of Islam 3 (2d ed.), pp. 283-85.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil 1994. “The Ottoman State: Economy and Society, 1300-1600,” in An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire 1300-1914, ed. Inalcik, Halil and Quataert, Donald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, Ronald. 1978. “Kadi, Court, and Legal Procedure in 17th C. Ottoman Kayseri,” Studia Islamica 48, pp. 133-72.Google Scholar
Jennings, Ronald 1979. “Limitations on the Judicial Powers of the Kadi in 17th C. Ottoman Kayseri,” Studia Islamica 50, pp. 151-84.Google Scholar
Khoury, Dina Rizk. 1997. State and Provincial Society in the Ottoman Empire: Mosul, 1540-1834. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neşrî, (Mevlana Mehmed). 1987. Kitab-ı Cihan-nüma: Neşrî Tarihi, ed. Unat, F.R. and Köymen, M.A.. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.Google Scholar
Özdeğer, Hüseyin. 1988. Onaltıncı Asırda Ayıntab Livası, Istanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi.Google Scholar
Peirce, Leslie. 1998. “Le dilemme de Fatma: crime sexuel et culture juridique dans une cour ottomane au début des temps modernes,” Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 53/2, pp. 291–319.Google Scholar
Salzman, Ariel. 1993. “An Ancien Régime Revisited: ‘Privatization’ and Political Economy in the Eighteenth-Century Ottoman Empire,” Politics & Society 21/4, pp. 393–423.Google Scholar