Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:41:07.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politicization of Ethnicity: The Moravian-Silesian Movement in the Czech Republic and the Silesian Movement in Poland—A Comparative Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2019

Anna Muś Open the ORCID record for Anna Muś [Opens in a new window]
Anna Muś*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Science, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ethnoregionalism in Europe is a phenomenon usually studied in the context of Western Europe. Still, in Central and Eastern Europe, there are some social and political movements that can be categorized as ethnoregionalist. The phenomenon started to play a role even before the Great War and in the interwar period, but was suppressed during the times of socialist regimes. It resurfaced immediately after 1989 during the times of transformation of political systems to fully democratic systems when problems of decentralization, authority, and division of power became openly discussed. In this article, I compare two such movements in the context of their political potential. The Moravian-Silesian movement in the Czech Republic and the Silesian movement in Poland have both similarities and differences, but the article mostly focuses on the evolution of these movements.

Keywords

ethnoregionalismregionUpper-SilesiaSilesiaMoravia
Type
Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 47 , Issue 6 , November 2019 , pp. 1048 - 1066
Copyright
© Association for the Study of Nationalities 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berdychowska, Bogumiła. 1998. Mniejszości narodowe w Polsce. Praktyka po 1989 roku [National Minorities in Poland. Practice after 1989]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.Google Scholar
Bieniasz, Stanisław. 1990. “O autonomię Górnego Śląska” [“For autonomy of Upper Silesia”]. Kultura. November: 9–20. http://static.kulturaparyska.com/attachments/1e/66/776fd2ca1071043e46667a479f97de2e8c2261df.pdf#page=6Google Scholar
Birnir, Johanna K., Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, Fearon, James D., Laitin, David, Gurr, Ted R., Brancati, Dawn, Saideman, Stephen, et al. 2015. “Socially Relevant Ethnic Groups, Ethnic Structure and AMAR.” Journal of Peace Research 52 (1): 110–115.Google Scholar
Birnir, Johanna K., Laitin, David, Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, Hultquist, Agatha S., Waguespack, David, and Gurr, Ted R.. 2016. Socially Relevant Identity: Addressing Selection Bias Issues and Introducing the AMAR (All Minorities at Risk) Data. CIDCM Working Paper. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management (CIDCM).Google Scholar
Úřad, Český Statistický, 2014. Analýza. Národnostní struktura obyvatel [Analysis. National structure of citizens]. Praha: ČSÚ.Google Scholar
Úřad, Český Statistický. 2019. https://www.volby.cz/. (Accessed July 4, 2018.)Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2011. “What Is an Ethnic Party?” Party Politics 17 (2): 151–169.Google Scholar
Constitution of the Czech Republic. 1992. No. 1/1993 Coll. adopted on December 16 with amendments.Google Scholar
ECHR. 2004. Case of Gorzelik and Others vs. Poland, Application No. 44258/98, Judgment from February 17.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Thomas H. 2010. (1994). Ethnicity and Nationalism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2006. “Ethnic Mobilization and Ethnic Violence.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, edited by Weingast, Barry R. and Wittman, Donald, 852–868. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerlich, Marian G. 1992. “Współczesne podziały górnośląskiej zbiorowości regionalnej jako problem etnograficzny”. [“Today’s Divisions of Upper-Silesian Regional Community as an Ethnographic Problem”] Etnografia polska XXXVI (1): 35–63.Google Scholar
Gerlich, Marian G. 1994. “Śląska krzywda—przejaw zbiorowego poczucia poniżenia wśród górnośląskiej rodzimej ludności (okres międzywojnia)” [“Silesian Harm—Symptom of Collective Perception of Degradation among Upper-Silesian Indigenous Population”]. Etnografia polska XXXVIII (1–2): 5–24.Google Scholar
Gerlich, Marian G. 2010. “My prawdziwi Górnoślązacy…” Studium etnologiczne [ “We True Upper-Silesians …” Ethnological Study]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo DiG.Google Scholar
Gudaszewski, Grzegorz. 2015. “Identyfikacje etniczne w Narodowym Spisie Powszechnym Ludności i Mieszkań z 2011 roku” [“Ethnic Identifications in National Census 2011”]. In Mniejszości narodowe i etniczne w świetle Spisu Powszechnego [National and Ethnic Minorities in National Census 2011], edited by Łodziński, Sławomir, Warmińska, Katarzyna, and Gudaszewski, Grzegorz, 56–119. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.Google Scholar
Hloušek, Vit. 2015. “From Region to Nation and Back Again: Moravian Parties’ Rhetoric and Politics in the Course of Time.” The Annual of Language & Politics and Politics of Identity IX: 5–22.Google Scholar
Kansteiner, Wulf. 2002. “Finding Meaning in Memory: A Methodological Critique of Collective Memory Studies.” History and Theory 41 (2): 179–197.Google Scholar
Klasik, Andrzej. 1988. “Tożsamość Górnego Śląska” [“Identity of Upper Silesia”]. Gość Niedzielny, February 7.Google Scholar
Kijonka, Joanna. 2016. Tożsamość współczesnych Górnoślązaków. Studium socjologiczne [Identity of Modern Upper-Silesians. Study in Social Science]. Katowice, Poland: Stowarzyszenie Thesaurus Silesiae – Skarb Śląski.Google Scholar
Kunce, Agnieszka, and Kadłubek, Zbigniew. 2007. Myśleć Śląsk—wybór esejów [Thinking Silesia—Anthology of Essays]. Katowice, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Stein Rokkan. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voters Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, edited by Lipset, Seymour M. and Rokkan, Stein, 1–63. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, Oscar, and Müller, Sean. 2016. “Introduction: Explaining the policy success of regionalist parties in Western Europe.” In: Regionalist parties in Western Europe. Dimensions of success, edited by Mazzoleni, Oscar and Mülle, Sean, 1–22. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sekuła, Elżbieta A. 2009. Po co Ślązakom potrzebny jest naród? Niebezpieczne związki między autonomią i nacjonalizmem [Why Silesians Need a Nation? Dangerous Relations between Autonomy and Nationalism]. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza ŁOŚGRAF.Google Scholar
Smolorz, Michał. 2012. Śląsk wymyślony [Imagined Silesia]. Katowice, Poland: Antena Górnośląska.Google Scholar
Springerová, Pavlina. 2010. Analýza vývoje a činnosti Moravistických politických subjektů v letech 1989–2005 [Analysis of the Development and Activities of Moravian Political Subjects from 1989 to 2005]. Brno, Czech Republic: CDK.Google Scholar
Stowarzyszenie Osób Narodowości Śląskiej (SONS). 2019. http://slonzoki.org/tag/rada-gornoslaska/. (Accessed July 4, 2018.)Google Scholar
Strmiska, Maxmilián. 2000. “Rise and Fall of Moravian Regionalist Parties.” Středoevropské politické studie 4 (2). http://www.cepsr.com/clanek.php?ID=101.Google Scholar
Szmeja, Maria. 2014. “Pamięć o przeszłości w kulturze śląskiej” [“Memory of the Past in Silesian Culture”]. Studia Humanistyczne AGH: półrocznik Akademii Górniczo-Hutniczej im. Stanisława Staszica 13 (3): 219–234.Google Scholar
Szmeja, Maria. 2017. Śląsk—bez zmian (?): Ludzie, kultura i społeczność Śląska w perspektywie postkolonialnej [Silesia—No Changes (?) People, Culture and Community of Silesia in Post-Colonial Perspective]. Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy “Nomos”.Google Scholar
Tambor, Jolanta. 2006. Mowa Górnoślązaków oraz ich świadomośc językowa i etniczna [Speech of Upper Silesians and Their Linguistic and Ethnic Awareness]. Katowice, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar
Tambor, Jolanta. 2008. “Etnolekt śląski jako język regionalny. Uzasadnienie stanowiska” [“Silesian Ethnolect as Regional Language. Explanation”]. In Śląsko godka [Silesian Speech], edited by Tambor, Jolanta, 115–120. Katowice, Poland: Narodowa Oficyna Śląska.Google Scholar
Wanatowicz, Maria W. 2004. Od indyferentnej ludności do śląskiej narodowości? Postawy narodowe ludności autochtonicznej Górnego Śląska w latach 1945–2003 w świadomości społecznej [From Indifferent Population to Silesian Nationality? National Attitudes of Indigenous Population of Upper-Silesia from 1945 to 2003 in Social Awareness]. Katowice, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar
Weber, Anke, Hiers, Wesley, and Flesken, Anaid. 2016. “Politicization of Ethnicity.” In Politicized Ethnicity: Perspectives in Comparative Politics, edited by Weber, Anke, Hiers, Wesley, and Flesken, Anaid, 1–25. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wódz, Jacek. 2012. “Pożytki z refleksji z zakresu socjologii i antropologii polityki – zamiast wstępu” [“Benefits Coming from Reflection on Sociology and Anthrolopogy of Politics”]. In O pożytkach z badań z dziedziny socjologii i antropologii polityki. Próby refleksji [On Benefits Coming from Study in Sociology and Antrolopogy of Politics. Reflections], edited by Wódz, Jacek, 7–17. Katowice, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar
Wódz, Jacek. 2015. “Niedokończone tożsamości polityczne. Kilka słów o polskiej niedokończonej tożsamości narodowej” [“Unfinished Political Identities. Few Thoughts about Polish Unfinished National Identity”]. In Niedokończone tożsamości społeczne—szkice socjologiczne [Unfinished Political Identities—Sociological Sketches], edited by Wódz, Jacek and Grzegorz Libor, 11–34. Katowice, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar
Yang, Phillip Q. 2000. Ethnic Studies: Issues and Approaches. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar