Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T23:11:38.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Status of ASTM and Other National Standards for the Use of Fly Ash Pozzolans in Concrete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Richard M. Majko
Richard M. Majko*
Affiliation:
American Fly Ash Company, 606 Potter Road, Des Plaines, IL 60016
Get access

Abstract

The Subcommittee of ASTM that is responsible for pozzolan specifications, (C09.03.10) is currently revising C 618, the standard specification, and C 311, the standard test methods. It is no small task. It is generally considered that dividing fly ashes into two classifications (Class F and Class C) is no longer acceptable. The Subcommittee has reached the tentative conclusion that one class of fly ash pozzolan is more appropriate and less ambiguous, provided it is accompanied by an optional table outlining the appropriate limits for sulfate resistance, heat of hydration, hydraulic properties, etc. That is, the engineer need specify only a fly ash pozzolan. If the engineer needs more than a “general purpose” fly ash he calls for special characteristics from the optional requirement table. Any major revision in the C 618 specification challenges the Subcommittee to look for better and more useful test methods in C 311. The committee is looking at C 1012 for a sulfate resistance procedure, conduction calorimetry as a heat of hydration method, and better methods to evaluate pozzolanic activity. The committee is aware of the limited usefulness of hydrated lime or sodium hydroxide in evaluating pozzolanic activity. Perhaps a more suitable term, i.e. the activity index with cement, is more appropriate. Fly ash properties that need to be evaluated include water reduction, activation by lime and alkalies, hydraulic or self-cementing properties and pozzolanic activity. Any test that tends to compensate for a fly ash's lower reactivity (i.e., accelerated thermal curing at 35°C or 65°C) probably leads to misleading results. A critical look at the national standards of other countries might allow the committee to take a visionary yet practical approach toward a new fly ash specification.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 86: Symposium N – Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products III , 1986 , 293
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Aitcin, P.C., Autefage, F. and Carles-Gibergues, A., and Vaquier, A., in Second International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, SP-91, (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1986) pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
2. Berry, E.E and Malhotra, V.M, Fly Ash in Concrete, SP85–3 (CANMET, Ottawa, Ontario, 1986) pp. 139–149.Google Scholar
3. Manz, O.E., in Sixth International Ash Utilization Symposium Proceedings DOE/METC/82-52 (Department of Energy and National Ash Association, Washington, DC, 1982) pp. 235–245.Google Scholar
4. Rossouw, E. and Kruger, J., in Proceedings First International Conference on the Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Other Mineral By-Products in Concrete, SP-79 (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1983) pp. 201–220.Google Scholar
5. Diamond, S., in Proceedings International Symposium on The Use of PFA in Concrete. Volume 2, edited by Cabrera, J.G. and Cusens, A.R., April, 1982, (Dept. of Civil Eng., Leeds University, UK) pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
6. Butler, B., ASTM Cem. Concr. Aggreg., 4, 68–72 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Lee, C., Schlorholtz, S., and Demirel, T., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization, Utilization and Disposal III, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P. and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. Vol.65 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh), pp. 125–130.Google Scholar
8. Mehta, P.K., in Second International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, SP-91, (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1986) pp. 637–659.Google Scholar
9. Diamond, S., in Proc. Symp. N - Effects of Fly Ash Incorporation in Cement and Concrete, edited by Diamond, S. (D.M. Roy, Materials Research Laboratory, Univ. Park, PA 16802, 1982) pp. 12–23.Google Scholar
10. Tuutti, K. and Fagerlund, G., in Technology of Concrete When Pozzolans, Slags, and Chemical Admixtures are Used, (Joint Symposium of ACI and RILEM) pp. 105–119.Google Scholar
11. Mehta, P.K., ACI J., November-December, 1986, pp. 994–1000 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Dunstan, E., Fly Ash and Fly Ash Concrete, Bureau of Reclamation Rept. ERC-82-1, May, 1984; ASTM Cem. Concr. Aggreg. 2, 20–30 (1980); in Sulfate Resistance of Concrete, SP-77 (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1980).Google Scholar
13. Cabrera, J., Hopkins, C., Woolley, G., Lee, R., Shaw, J., Plowman, C. and Fox, H., in Second International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, SP-91, (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1986) pp. 115–144.Google Scholar
14. Helmuth, R., ASTM Cem., Concr. Aggreg. 5, 103–110 (1983).Google Scholar
15. Brink, R.H. and Halstead, W.J., Proc. ASTM, 56, 1161–1206 (1956).Google Scholar
16. Subcommittee III-h of ASTM Committee C9, “ooperative Tests of Fly Ash as an Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete”, Preprint 19a, ASTM, June 1962.Google Scholar
17. Helmuth, R., in Second International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, SP-91, (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1986) pp. 723–740.Google Scholar
18. Philleo, R.E., “Recent Developments in Pozzolan Specifications”, Supplementary Papers, Second Int'l Conference on the Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, Madrid, Spain, 1986, (also available from Craig Cain, Chairman, ASTM Subcommittee C09.03.10.)Google Scholar
19. Bobrowski, G.S., Master Builders, private communication, August, 1981.Google Scholar