Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:29:15.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Requirements and Constraints on Optimizing UV Processing of Low-k Dielectrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ivan L Berry III
Affiliation:
[email protected], Axcelis Technologies, , 108 Cherry Hill Drive, Beverly, MA, 01915, United States, 978-787-9475
Carlo Waldfried
Affiliation:
[email protected], Axcelis Technologies, 108 Cherry Hill Drive, Beverly, MA, 01915, United States
Kevin Durr
Affiliation:
[email protected], Axcelis Technologies, 108 Cherry Hill Drive, Beverly, MA, 01915, United States
Get access

Abstract

UV curing of low-k dielectrics presents a unique challenge in that the cure process is expected to do the impossible – increase hardness, modulus, cohesive strength, adhesion and reliability, decrease water absorbtion and dielectric constant, remove porogens (for porogen containing films), improve dielectric breakdown and chemical stability, all while minimizing shrinkage and contributions to film stress. Achieving this, in general, requires optimization of all of the cure parameters, such as UV spectral intensity, temperature, time, pressure, background gas, and process sequence, as well as the formulation of the low-k material itself. The spectral dependence of many of these important parameters will be discussed. A good figure of merit for modulus and k-value is the ratio of modulus/k-value. If one plots the spectral response of this ratio, one finds it peaks at a specific wavelength range. In principle it is possible to measure the UV spectral response of all of the critical parameters (not just modulus and k-value) and by overlaying these responses together determine what the proper UV exposure wavelength ranges should be. An example of this will be shown for an idealized porogen containing low-k material, for modulus, k-value, porogen removal and porogen crosslinking. A real low-k dielectric system has many more wavelength parameters to consider and the problem of bulb spectral intensity optimization becomes complex. It is also found that the relative intensity of the important wavelength bands also plays a significant role, requiring a great deal of spectral optimization experiments.

UV cure performance is also dependent on cure temperature, time, background gases and ironically, the deposition or post-deposition bake temperature. Most cure parameters such as modulus, hardness, leakage, adhesion, etc, have a strong and generally exponential dependence on cure temperature. As a result, most UV cures are performed at the highest temperature allowable as defined by thermal budget constraints and copper voiding thresholds. Background ambient can also play a critical role in the UV cure, especially for porous low-k materials and those containing porogens. Changes in composition of the background gases can alter interface. The ultimate in performance is obtained when the low-k material formulation itself is included as a key parameter in the cure optimization. By optimizing the material, UV spectrum, and cure parameters together, significant improvements can be made.

In conclusion, UV curing cannot be implemented without serious consideration to the wavelength dependence on many critical process factors. The interdependence of all components that makeup the optical system such as the wavelengths employed, light source technology, chamber design and ironically, the dielectric film itself must be considered. Only with these factors in mind, can the full benefit of UV curing be realized.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Orvek, K. J. and Dennis, M.L., SPIE Advances in Resist Technology and Processing IV, Santa Clara, CA, vol. 771, 281288, 1987..Google Scholar
2 Spiertz, E.J., Vollenbroeck, F. A., Verhaar, R. D., Dil, J. G., Microcircuit Engineering 1984 Proceedings, Berlin, 1984.Google Scholar
3 Harris, D., Greene, W., Hass, C., Whiteside, D., Mohondro, R., Future Fab International, vol. 8 (2000).Google Scholar
4 Iacopi, F., Travaly, Y., Eyckens, B., Waldfried, C., Abell, T., Guyer, E. P., Gage, D. M., Dauskardt, R. H., Sajavaara, T., Houthoofd, K., Grobet, P., Jacobs, P., Maex, K., J. Appl. Phys. 99, 053511 (2006)Google Scholar
5 Albrecht, G., Blanchette, C., J.Electrochem.Soc., 145 (11), pp.40194024, 1998.Google Scholar
6 Iacopi, F.; Waldfried, C.; Abell, T.; Guyer, E.; Eyckens, B.; Travaly, Y.; Sajavaara, T.; Gage, D.; Beyer, G.; Berry, I.; Dauskardt, R. and Maex, K. MRS Spring Meeting Symposium B: Materials, Technology and Reliability of Advanced Interconnects. (March 28- April 1, 2005; San Francisco, CA, USA.).Google Scholar
7 Gage, D. M., Guyer, E. P., Dauskardt, R. H., Advanced Metallization Conference (October 17 -19, 2006; San Diego, CA, USA).Google Scholar
8 Iacopi, F., Beyer, G., Travaly, Y., Waldfried, C., Gage, D.M., Dauskardt, R.H., Houthoofd, K., Jacobs, P., Adriaensens, P., Schulze, K., Schulz, S.E., List, S. and Carlotti, G., Acta Materialia 55(4) pp.14071414, 2007.Google Scholar