Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:51:49.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polymeric/Inorganic Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Simultaneous Drug Delivery and Visualization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Andrea Fornara
Affiliation:
[email protected], Royal Institute of Technology, Functional Materials Division, Stockholm, Sweden
Alberto Recalenda
Affiliation:
[email protected], Royal Institute of Technology, Functional Materials Division, Stockholm, Sweden
Jian Qin
Affiliation:
[email protected], Royal Institute of Technology, Functional Materials Division, Stockholm, Sweden
Abhilash Sugunan
Affiliation:
[email protected], Royal Institute of Technology, Functional Materials Division, Stockholm, Sweden
Fei Ye
Affiliation:
[email protected], Royal Institute of Technology, Functional Materials Division, Stockholm, Sweden
Sophie Laurent
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Mons, Department of General, Organic and Biomedical Chemistry, Mons, Belgium
Robert N Muller
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Mons, Department of General, Organic and Biomedical Chemistry, Mons, Belgium
Jing Zou
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Tampere, Department of Otolaryngology, Tampere, Finland
Abo-Ramadan Usama
Affiliation:
[email protected], Biomedicum, Experimental MRI Laboratory, Helsinki, Finland
Muhammet S Toprak
Affiliation:
[email protected]@gmail.com, Royal Institute of Technology, Functional Materials Division, Stockholm, Sweden
Mamoun Muhammed
Affiliation:
[email protected], Royal Institute of Technology, Functional Materials Division, Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Nanoparticles consisting of different biocompatible materials are attracting a lot of interest in the biomedical area as useful tools for drug delivery, photo-therapy and contrast enhancement agents in MRI, fluorescence and confocal microscopy. This work mainly focuses on the synthesis of polymeric/inorganic multifunctional nanoparticles (PIMN) based on biocompatible di-block copolymer poly(L,L-lactide-co-ethylene glycol) (PLLA-PEG) via an emulsion-evaporation method. Besides containing a hydrophobic drug (Indomethacin), these polymeric nanoparticles incorporate different visualization agents such as superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION) and fluorescent Quantum Dots (QDs) that are used as contrast agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and fluorescence microscopy together. Gold Nanorods are also incorporated in such nanostructures to allow simultaneous visualization and photodynamic therapy. MRI studies are performed with different loading of SPION into PIMN, showing an enhancement in T2 contrast superior to commercial contrast agents. Core-shell QDs absorption and emission spectra are recorded before and after their loading into PIMN. With these polymeric/inorganic multifunctional nanoparticles, both MRI visualization and confocal fluorescence microscopy studies can be performed. Gold nanorods are also synthesized and incorporated into PIMN without changing their longitudinal absorption peak usable for lased excitation and phototherapy. In-vitro cytotoxicity studies have also been performed to confirm the low cytotoxicity of PIMN for further in-vivo studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Qin, J., Jo, Y. S., Ihm, E.J., Jong, E., Kim, D.K., Muhammed, M., Langmuir 21, 9346 (2005)Google Scholar
2 Fornara, A., Johansson, P., K. Petersson et al. Nano Lett. 8 (10), 3423 (2008)Google Scholar
3 Bornscheuer, U. T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 3336 (2003)Google Scholar
4 Qin, J., Laurent, S., Jo, Y. S., Roch, A., et al., Adv. Mater. 19, 1874 (2007)Google Scholar
5 Kim, B. S., Taton, T. A., Langmuir 23, 2198 (2007)Google Scholar
6 Rye, Philip D., Bio/Technology 14, 155 (1996)Google Scholar
7 Michalet, X., Pinaud, F. F., Bentolila, L. A., et al., Science 307, 538 (2005).Google Scholar
8 Nikhil, J. R., Small 1 (8-9), 875 (2005)Google Scholar
9 Fahmy, T. M, Fong, P.M., Goyal, A., W.M. Shakesheff Nano today 8, 18 (2005)Google Scholar
10 Qin, J., Asempah, I., Laurent, S., Fornara, A., et al., Adv. Mater. 21, 1354 (2009)Google Scholar
11 Carion, O., Mahler, B., Pons, T., Dubertret, B., Nat. Protoc. 2, 2383 (2007).Google Scholar
12 Yang, J., Wu, J.C., Wu, Y.C., Wang, J.K., Chen, C.C., Chem. Phys. Lett. 416, 215 (2005)Google Scholar
13 Khabbaz, F., Karlsson, S., Albertsson, A. N., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 78, 2369 (2000)Google Scholar
14 Jo, J. Y. S. et al. Nanotechnol. 15, 1186 (2004)Google Scholar
15 Geraldesa, C. F. G. C., Laurent, S., Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 4, 1 (2009)Google Scholar
16 Josephson, L., Lewis, J., Jacobs, P., Hahn, P. F., Stark, D. D., Magn. Reson. Imaging 647 (1988).Google Scholar