Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T06:31:22.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nature and Effect of the Alteration Layer During Nuclear Waste Glass Dissolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

A. Gauthier
Affiliation:
UMR CNRS PBDS, USTL, UFR Sciences de la Terre, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex France UMR CNRS 6532, ESIP, LMGE, 40, av. du Recteur Pineau 86022 Poitiers Cedex, France
P. Le Coustumer
Affiliation:
CDGA, Université Bordeaux1, Av. des facultés, 33405 Talence cedex, France
J-H. Thomassin
Affiliation:
UMR CNRS 6532, ESIP, LMGE, 40, av. du Recteur Pineau 86022 Poitiers Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

The goal of this study is to understand the role of the interface developed during R7T7 glass alteration. This glass has been leached in two different aqueous media (pure water, silica rich water and phosphorous rich water). The lixiviation tests have been optimized to assess the role of the alteration layer developed on the surface of the glass. The solution and the solid have been characterized by ICP-MS and TEM/X-EDS respectively. The results put in evidence that a complex alteration layer is formed. Its texture, structure and chemistry are discussed with respect to the evolution of the solution during the tests. The alteration layer is always present on the surface of the glass and is considered to control (at short time) diffusion of the different species through the layer. Further study must be undertaken to assess the evolution and the stability of the interface for longer time periods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bonniaud, R., Jacquet-Francillon, N. and Sombret, C., Nucl. Chem. Waste Management, 1, 3 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Jouan, A., Ladirat, C. and J.Moncouyoux, P.,in Advances in Ceramics, Nuclear Waste Management II, edited by Clark, D.E., White, W.B. and Machiels, A.J., (1986) pp.105116.Google Scholar
3. Bourcier, W.L., ANL 9417, Argonne National Laboratory Reports, 1994.Google Scholar
4. Delage, F. F., Ghaleb, D., Dussossoy, J.L., Chevallier, O. and Vernaz, E., J. of Nucl. Mat., 190 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Pacaud, F., Jacquet-Francillon, N., Terki, A. and Fillet, C., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII (Elsevier science publishers, New York, 1989), pp.105120.Google Scholar
6. Gauthier, A. A, PhD thesis, University of Poitiers, 1999.Google Scholar
7. Kim, J.I., in Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of the Actinides, edited by Freeman, A. J. and Keller, C. (1986) 567.Google Scholar
8. Grambow, B., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, (Elsevier science publishers, New York, 1985) pp. 1521.Google Scholar
9. Gin, S., Godon, N., Mestre, J.P., Vernaz, E.Y. and Beaufort, D., Applied Geochem., 9, 255 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Inseghem, P. Van and Grambow, B. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M.J. (Elsevier science publishers, New York, 1988), pp. 631639.Google Scholar
11.S.Caroll, A., Bruno, J., Petit, J.C. and, J.C. J.Dran, C., Radiochim. Acta, 58–59, 245 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Gauthier, A., Lecoustumer, P., Motelica, M. and Donard, O.F.X, Waste Management, 20, 8 (2000).Google Scholar