Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:39:39.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructural Evolution During Superplastic Deformation of Titanium Aluminides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

H.S. Yang ,
M.G. Zelin  and
A.K. Mukherjee
H.S. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Aeronautical and Materials Engineering University of California, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A.
M.G. Zelin
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Aeronautical and Materials Engineering University of California, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A.
A.K. Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Aeronautical and Materials Engineering University of California, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Microstructural studies have been performed on two superplastically deformed Ti3Al-based alloys, regular α2 and super α2. Dynamic grain growth, formation of phase stringers, and changes in the apparent volume fraction of the phases occurred in both alloys. The lath-like α2 phase in the super α2 alloy broke up during deformation. All these features are examined from the viewpoint of cooperative grain boundary sliding (CGBS). Cooperative grain boundary migration (CGBM), which is coupled with CGBS, is proposed to be the mechanism for strain induced grain growth and changes in the phase volume fraction.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 288: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys V , 1992 , 879
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Cahn, R.W., Metals, Materials and Processes, 1,1 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Lipsitt, H.A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 39, 351 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Dutta, A. and Bannerjee, D., Scripta Metal. Meter., 25, 1223 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Yang, H. S., Jin, P., Dalder, E. and Mukherjee, A.K., Scripta Metal. Mater., 25, 1223 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Ghosh, A.K. and Cheng, C-H, in Superplasticity in Advanced Materials, Hori, S., Tokizane, M. and Furushiro, N., eds, The Japan Society for Research on Superplasticity, Osaka, Japan, 299 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Yang, H.S., Jin, P. and Mukherjee, A.K., Mater. Sci. Eng., A153, 457 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Kestner-Weykamp, H.T., Ward, C.H., Broderick, T.F. and Kaufman, M.J., Scripta Metall, 23, 1697 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Bassi, C., Peters, J.A. and Wittenauer, J., JOM, 41(9), 18 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Sherby, O.D. and Wadsworth., J., Prog. Mater. Sci., 33, 169 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Chokshi, A.H., Mukherjee, A.K. and Langdon, T. G., to be published in Materials Science Reports, Elsevier Science Publisher, (1992).Google Scholar
11. Astanin, V.V. and Kaibyshev, O.A. and Faizava, S.N., Scripta Metall. Mater., 25, 2663 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Zelin, M.G. and Alexsandrova, M.V., in Superplasticity in Advanced Materials, Hori, S., Tokizane, M. and Furushiro, N., eds, The Japan Society for Research on Superplasticity, Osaka, Japan, 63 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Yang, H.S., Zelin, M. G., Valiev, R.Z. and Mukherjee, A.K., Scripta Metall. Mater., 26, 1707 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Zelin, M.G., James, R. and Mukerjee, A.K., J. Mater. Sci. Lttr, in press.Google Scholar
15. Pond, R.C., Smith, D.A. and Southerden, P.W.J., Phil. Mag., A37, 27 (1978).Google Scholar
16. Frost, H. J. and Raj, R., in Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 196, Materials Research Society, 21 (1990).Google Scholar