Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-nxk7g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T10:25:51.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrated, Dual-Function Remote Plasma-Enhanced Processing Applied to Low Damage SiO2 Etching and Removal of C-F Polymer Residues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

T. Yasuda
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–8202
G. Lucovsky
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–8202
Get access

Abstract

We report a dual-function chamber integrating (a) remote RF plasma-enhanced etching of SiO2 layers on Si(100) surfaces with low energy, <100 eV, ion bombardment and (b) in-situ removal of polymeric C-F residues that are formed on the exposed Si surfaces. Using direct plasma excitation of He and downstream introduction of CF4, an SiO2 etch rate of ̃5 nm/min was obtained at a CF4 partial pressure as low as 0.25 mTorr. An exposure to atomic-H at a substrate temperature of 250°C was effective in removing polymeric residues from the Si surface, while an exposure to reactive O-species was less effective. We achieved a low-temperature, ̃300°C, homoepitaxial growth of Si on the Si(100) surface that was subjected to plasma etching followed by an exposure to atomic-H. The electrical damage of the processed Si surfaces was evaluated by a new technique, where a device-quality SiO2 film was deposited on this surface by remote PECVD and the C-V characteristics of the MOS structure were measured.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] For example, Lynch, W. T., 1987 IEDM Technical Digest (IEEE, New York, 1987), p. 354 Google Scholar
[2] Lucovsky, G., Tsu, D. V., Rudder, R. A., and Markunas, R. J., This Film Processes II, edited by Vossen, J. L. and Kern, E. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1991), p. 565 Google Scholar
[3] Schneider, T. P., Bernhard, B. L., Chen, Y. L., and Nemanich, R. J., MRS Symp. Proc. 259 (1992)Google Scholar
[4] Yasuda, T., Ma, Y., Habermehl, S., and Lucovsky, G., Appl. Phys. Lett., 60, 434 (1992): MRS Symp. Proc. 238 (1992) in pressGoogle Scholar
[5] Yasuda, T. and Lucovsky, G., submitteed to J. Vac. Sci. Technol.Google Scholar
[6] Heinecke, R. A. H., Solid-State Electron., 18, 1146 (1975)Google Scholar
[7] Simko, J. P. and Oehrlein, G. S., J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 2748 (1991)Google Scholar
[8] Coburn, J. W., J. Appl. Phys., 50, 5210 (1979); Plasma Etching and Reactive ion Etching, Americam Vacuum Society Monograph Series (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1982), p. 40Google Scholar
[9] Schneider, T. P., Cho, J., Vander Weide, J., Wells, S. E., Lucovsky, G., Nemanich, R. J., Mantini, M. J., Rudder, R. A., and Markunas, R. J., MRS Symp. Proc., 204, 333 (1991)Google Scholar
[10] Habermehl, S. and Lucovsky, G., unpublished dataGoogle Scholar
[11] Tin, C. C., Lin, T. H., and Tzeng, Y., J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 3094 (1991)Google Scholar
[12] Mu, X. C., Fonash, S. J., Oehrlein, G. S., Chakravarti, S. N., Parks, C., and Keller, J., J. Appl. Phys., 59, 2958 (1986)Google Scholar
[13] Yasuda, T., Ma, Y., Lucovsky, G., Chen, Y.L., and Maher, D., to be published in J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B11 (1993)Google Scholar
[14] For example, Abe, T. and Nakata, H., Oyobutsuri, 47, 490 (1978)Google Scholar
[15] For example, Misra, D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 10, 301 (1992)Google Scholar
[16] Ma, Y., Yasuda, T., Bjorkman, C. H., and Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A10, 781 (1992)Google Scholar
[17] Froitzheim, H., The Chemical Physics of Solid Surfaces and Heterogeneous Catalysis, edited by King, D. A. and Woodruff, D. P. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988), p. 190 Google Scholar