Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:27:09.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Throughput Synthesis of Pigments by Solution Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Stuart J. Henderson
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Andrew L. Hector
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Mark T. Weller
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Combinatorial and high throughput methods have been utilised in the pharmaceutical industry for many years. The process involves the simultaneous synthesis of libraries containing thousands of compounds, which can then be screened for desirable properties. More recently the concepts of parallel synthesis and high-throughput screening have emerged as effective strategies in the search for novel inorganic materials. We report the development of high throughput methods, which have been used for the synthesis and preliminary characterisation of ceramic oxide pigments on an alumina substrate. This methodology has been utilised to prepare compounds with the spinel structure in the series Cu1-xZnxAl2-yCryO4 (0≤x≤1, 0≤y≤2) at a range of temperatures. The materials are analysed by rapid sequential X-ray diffraction and a simple colour measurement technique. The optical properties across the quaternary landscape can therefore be mapped as a function of composition, structure and annealing temperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jandeleit, B., Powers, T. S., Schaefer, D. J., Turner, H. W., and Weinberg, W. H., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38 2494 (1999)Google Scholar
2. Xiang, X. D. and Yoo, Y. K., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 14 R49-R78 (2002)Google Scholar
3. Sun, T. X., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 61 193 (1999)Google Scholar
4. Koinuma, H., Takeuchi, I. and Van Dover, R. B., MRS Bull. 27 301 (2002)Google Scholar
5. Mcginn, P. J. and Reichenbach, H. M., J. Mater. Res. 16 967 (2001)Google Scholar
6. Park, H. D., Seo, S. Y. and Sohn, K. S., Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 4 H26-H29 (2001)Google Scholar
7. Belokonova, N. A., Antropova, O. A., Nikonenko, E. A., Inorg. Mater. 31 995 (1995)Google Scholar
8. Pishch, I. V., Popovskaya, N. F., Radion, E.V., Glass Ceram, 56 320 (1999)Google Scholar
9. Burghelea, V., Runcanu, C., Popa, C., Mater. Constructii. 30 173 (2000)Google Scholar
10. PCPDFWIN Version 2.4, Powder Diffraction File, International Centre for Diffraction Data, Swarthmore, PA, 2003.Google Scholar
11. Von Dreele, R. B., Larson, A. C., GSAS general structure analysis system, Neutron Scattering Centre, MS-H805, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2001.Google Scholar
12. Shannon, R. D., Acta. Cryst. A32 751 (1976)Google Scholar
13. Jansen, M., Letschert, H., Nature 404 980 (2000)Google Scholar