Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:28:24.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Green Function Cellular Method and Its Relation to Multiple Scattering Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

W. H. Butler ,
X.-G Zhang  and
A. Gonis
W. H. Butler
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6114
X.-G Zhang
Affiliation:
Center for Computational Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0045
A. Gonis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Abstract

We investigate techniques for solving the wave equation which are based on the idea of obtaining exact local solutions within each potential cell, which are then joined to form a global solution. We derive full potential multiple scattering theory (MST) from the Lippmann-Schwinger equation and show that it as well as a closely related cellular method are techniques of this type. This cellular method appears to have all of the advantages of MST and the added advantage of having a secular matrix with only nearest neighbor interactions. Since this cellular method is easily linearized one can rigorously reduce electronic structure calculations to the problem of solving a nearest neighbor tight-binding problem.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 253: Symposium V – Application of Multiple Scattering Theory to Materials Science , 1991 , 205
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kohn, W. and Rostoker, N., Phys. Rev. 94, 1111 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Butler, W. H., Gonis, A. and Zhang, X.-G. (to be published)Google Scholar
3. Williams, A. R. and Morgan, J. van W., J. Phys. C 7, 37 (1974).Google Scholar
4. Butler, W. H. and Nesbet, R. K., Phys. Rev. B 42, 1518 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Andersen, O. K., Lecture Notes, Mount Tremblant Summer School (1973).Google Scholar
6. Faulkner, J. S., Phys. Rev. B 19, 6186, (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Smith, F. C. Jr. and Johnson, K. H., Phys. Rev. Letters, 22, 1168 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ferreira, L. G. and Leite, J. R., Phys. Rev. A 18, 335 (1978).Google Scholar