Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T12:16:28.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glass Formation Dependence on Casting Atmosphere in a Zr-Al-Ni-Cu-Pd Alloy System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Albertus Deny Setyawan
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tohoku University, Center for Interdisciplinary Research, Aramaki-aza Aoba 6-3, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan, +81-22-795-5760, +81-22-795-7810
Hidemi Kato
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tohoku University, Institute for Materials Research, Katahira 2-1-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8577, Japan
Junji Saida
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tohoku University, Center for Interdisciplinary Research, Aramaki-aza Aoba 6-3, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan
Akihisa Inoue
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tohoku University, Institute for Materials Research, Katahira 2-1-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8577, Japan
Get access

Abstract

A Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu17.5-xPdx (x=0-17.5 at. %) alloy system is found to exhibit a unique dependence of glass-forming ability (GFA) on casting atmosphere during mold-casting process. High-Pd containing alloys (x=7.5-17.5) showed a remarkable increase of critical size (dc) for glass formation, in contrast with the low-Pd containing alloys (x=0-5) in which no significant change in dc was observed, as the pressure of Ar atmosphere varied from vacuum to ambient. The origin of the phenomenon has been successively unveiled by correlating the cooling characteristic during casting process and phase transformation behavior during continuous cooling of the alloy system. The consequence in the structure and property control is investigated and discussed in detail.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Turnbull, D., Contemp. Phys. 10, 473 (1969).Google Scholar
2. Chen, H. S., Rep. Prog. Phys. 43, 353 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Setyawan, A. D., PhD. Thesis, Tohoku University, 2007.Google Scholar
4. Illekovà, E., Jergel, M, Duhaj, P and Inoue, A, Mater. Sci. Eng. A226–228, 388 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Rehmet, A, Günther-Schade, K., Rätzke, K., Geyer, U and Faupel, F, Phys. Status Solidi A201, 467 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Slipenyuk, A and Eckert, J, Scripta Mater. 50, 39 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Kanungo, B. P., Glade, S. C., Kumar, P. A. and Flores, K. M., Intermetallics 12, 1073 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Spaepen, F, Scripta Mater. 54, 363 (2006).Google Scholar
9. Murali, P and Ramamurty, U, Acta Mater. 53, 1467 (2005).Google Scholar
10. Huang, Y. J., J. Shen and Sun, J. F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 081919 (2007).Google Scholar
11. Shen, J, Huang, Y. J. and Sun, J. F., J. Mater. Res. 22, 3067 (2007).Google Scholar
12. Vargaftik, N. B., Handbook of Physical Properties of Liquids and Glasses: Pure Substances and Mixtures, (Hemisphere Publishing Corp., 1975).Google Scholar