Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:36:02.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of mechanical parameters for rotating MEMS structures as a function of deposition method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

S. Soare
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
S. J. Bull
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
A. Oila
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
A. G. O'Neill
Affiliation:
School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
N. Wright
Affiliation:
School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
A. Horsfall
Affiliation:
School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
J. dos Santos
Affiliation:
School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
Get access

Abstract

The dimensions of microelectronic devices are constantly being reduced due to the increasing operational demands imposed such as higher working frequencies, higher component density and lower power consumption. This affects the geometrical dimensions of the metallisation, i.e. its width and thickness. The mechanical properties of very thin films are considerably different from those of bulk materials and, also, the deposition method may influence the mechanical behaviour of the components. In order to obtain reliable metallisation it is therefore important to assess accurately the mechanical parameters of the interconnecting lines. As part of designing, developing and manufacturing of a stress micro-sensor there is a need to extract properties useful for performance prediction such as yield stress or creep relaxation behaviour. Part of the data may be obtained by nanoindentation but to have a more complete view, finite element analysis of the indentation cycle has to be employed. In this study nanoindentation testing was carried out at various depths on sputtered and evaporated aluminium layers with different thicknesses deposited on (100) silicon. The loading curves were then simulated by FEA and the results compared to identify the yield properties of the coating. Modelling data for thicker samples closely follows experimental data but for thinner coatings there is a considerable gradient in properties through the film thickness. By incorporating a peak load hold the creep behaviour of the metallization can also be assessed and modelling parameters developed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kramer, D. E., Volinsky, A. A., Moody, N.R. and Gerberich, W. W., J. Mater. Res., 16, 3150, (2000).Google Scholar
2. Thorton, J. A., Ann. Rev. Mat. Sci., 1, 239, (1977).Google Scholar
3. Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mat. Res., 7, 1564, (1992).Google Scholar
4. Oila, A. and Bull, S. J., Z. Metall., 94, 793, (2003).Google Scholar
5. ANSYS 6.1. SAS IP, Inc. Canonsburg, PA.Google Scholar
6. Liu, J., Mwanza, M. C., Reed, P. A. S. and Syngellakys, S., ANSYS application note (2002).Google Scholar
7. Pelletier, H., Krier, J., Cornet, A., Mille, P., Thin Solid Films, 379, 147, (2000).Google Scholar
8. Soare, S., Bull, S. J., O'Neill, A.G., Wright, N., Horsfall, A. and dos Santos, J., Surf. Coat. Technol., in press (2003).Google Scholar
9. Feng, G. and Ngan, A.H.W., Scripta Materialia, 43, 971, (2001).Google Scholar
10. Ohmura, T., Matsuoka, S., Tanaka, K. and Yoshida, T., Thin Solid Films, 385, 198, (2001).Google Scholar
11. Soare, S., Bull, S. J., Horsfall, A., dos Santos, J., O'Neill, A.G. and Wright, N.G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 750, 83, (2003).Google Scholar
12. Petch, N.J., J. Iron Steel Institute, 174, 25, (1953).Google Scholar