Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:07:50.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conductivity–Chemistry Relationship in Simulated Nuclear Waste Glass Melts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. K. Sundaram  and
Elvis Q. Le
S. K. Sundaram
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA 99352, [email protected]
Elvis Q. Le
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA 99352, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Electrical conductivity of three simulated nuclear waste glass melts was measured over a wide range of temperatures, using a high-accuracy, calibration-free, coaxial-cylinders technique. Glass chemistries representing both low-activity and high-level wastes at Hanford and Savannah River sites were used. The temperature dependence of the conductivity of these glasses was presented. The conductivity values measured at 1150°C were compared to the conductivity values predicted from first-order mixture model.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 608: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIII , 1999 , 665
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Stanek, J., “Electrical Properties of Glass,” pp. 15–88 in Electric Melting of Glass, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1977.Google Scholar
2 Jantzen, C. M., “First Principles Process-Product Models for Vitrification of Nuclear Waste: Relationship of Glass Composition to Glass Viscosity, Resistivity, Liquidus Temperature, and Durability,” pp. 37–51 in Nuclear Waste Management IV, Editor: Wicks, G. G., Bickford, D. F., Bunnell, L. Roy, Ceramic Transactions, Volume 23, The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio, USA, 1991.Google Scholar
3 Hrma, P. R., Piepel, G. F., Schweiger, M. J., Smith, D. E., Kim, D.-S., Redgate, P. E., Vienna, J. D., LoPresti, C. A., Peeler, D. B., Langowski, M. H. in Property/Composition Relationships for Hanford High-Level Waste Glasses Melting at 1150°C, PNL-103 59, Vol. 1&2, December 1994.Google Scholar
4 Hrma, P. R., Piepel, G. F., Smith, D. E., Redgate, P. E., and Schweiger, M. J., “Effect of Composition and Temperature on Viscosity and Electrical Conductivity of Borosilicate Glasses for Hanford Nuclear Waste Immobilization,” pp. 151–158 in Environmental and Waste Management Issues in the Ceramic Industry, Editor: Mellinger, G. B., Ceramic Transactions, Volume 39, The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio, USA, 1994.Google Scholar
5 Schiefelbein, S. L., “A New Technique to Measure the Electrical Properties of Molten Oxides,” Ph. D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1996.Google Scholar
6 Schiefelbein, S. L. and Sadoway, D. R., “A High-Accuracy, Calibration-Free Technique for Measuring the Electrical Conductivity of Molten Oxides,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 28B 1141–1149 (1997).Google Scholar
7 Schiefelbein, S. L., “A High-Accuracy, Calibration-Free Technique for Measuring the Electrical Conductivity of Glass Melts,” pp. 99–113 in Electrochemistry of Glass and Ceramics, Editors: Sundaram, S. K., Bickford, D. F., and Homyak, E. J Jr., Ceramic Transactions, Volume 32, The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio, USA, 1999.Google Scholar