Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T05:18:49.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Melting Behavior of DNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Kenneth A. Marx ,
J. W. Bizzaro ,
Iman Assil  and
R. D. Blake
Kenneth A. Marx
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA. 01854
J. W. Bizzaro
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA. 01854
Iman Assil
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA. 01854
R. D. Blake
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of Maine Orono, ME 04469
Get access

Abstract

High resolution melting curves of total nuclear Dictyostelium discoideum DNA (A×3 strain) are compared to theoretical melting calculated from GENBANK sequences(1.74 % of total) by the statistical thermodynamics program MELTSIM, parameterized for long DNA sequences(1,2). The lower and upper limits of simulated melting agree quantitatively with the experimental melting of total DNA. Calculated melting of coding, intron and flanking regions indicate that intron and flanking DNAs are extremely (A+T)-rich and account for the earliest melting DNA. There is no temperature overlap of these regions with coding DNA. A theoretical denaturation map of DNA containing the ribosomal DNA genes showed excellent agreement with subtransition positions of these genes in experimental curves. Agreement between these calculated and experimental melting data demonstrates our ability to accurately simulate DNA melting in complex eukaryotic genomes. This has important consequences for the understanding of sequence dependent energetic properties of nucleic acids and their potential use as biomaterials.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 463: Symposia EE – Statistical Mechanics in Physics and Biology , 1996 , 147
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Delcourt, S.G. and Blake, R.D., J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15160–15169 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Blake, R.D., in Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology and Molecular Medicine. Volume 2. (Myers, R.A., ed.) VCH Publ., Basel, 1–18 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Marx, K.A., Lim, J.O., Minehan, D., Pande, R., Kamath, M. and Tripathy, S., J. Intel. Material Systems and Structures, 5, 447–454 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Patti, J.L., Marx, K.A. and Blake, R.D., J. Cell Biology 115, 90 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Poland, D. and Scheraga, H.A., Theory of Helix-Coil Transitions in Biopolymers, Academic Press, New York, (1970).Google Scholar
6. Poland, D., Biopolymers, 13, 1859–1871 (1974).Google Scholar
7. Fixman, M. and Friere, J., Biopolymers, 16, 2693–2704 (1977).Google Scholar
8. Firtel, R., Cockburn, A., Frankel, G. and Hershfeld, V., J. Mol. Biol. 102, 831–852 (1976).Google Scholar
9. Blake, R.D. and Hydom, T.G., J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods, 11, 307–316 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Yen, S-W.W. and Blake, R.D., Biopolymers 19, 681–700 (1980).Google Scholar
11. Ising, E. Physik 31, 253 (1925).Google Scholar
12. Hill, T.L., Statistical Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1956).Google Scholar
13. Wartell, R.M. and Benight, A.S., Physics Rep. 126, 67–107 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Marx, K.A., Hess, S.T. and Blake, R.D., J. Biomol. Str. & Dyn. 11, 57–66 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Marx, K.A., Hess, S.T. and Blake, R.D., J. Biomol. Str. & Dyn. 12, 235–246 (1994).Google Scholar
16. Kunkel, T.A. and Bebanek, K., Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 951, 1–15 (1988).Google Scholar