Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:31:00.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ceramics at the Emergence of the Silk Road: A Case of Village Potters from Southeastern Kazakhstan during the Late Iron Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

MaryFran Heinsch
Affiliation:
University of Chicago, Department of Anthropology, Chicago, IL 60637
Pamela B. Vandiver
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tuscon, AZ 85721
Kyra Lyublyanovics
Affiliation:
Central European University, Department of Medieval Studies, Budapest, Hungary
Alice M. Choyke
Affiliation:
Central European University, Department of Medieval Studies, Budapest, Hungary
Chandra Reedy
Affiliation:
University of Delaware, Laboratory for Analysis of Cultural Materials, Newark, DE
Perry Tourtellotte
Affiliation:
Sweet Briar College, Department of Anthropology, Sweet Briar, VA 24595
Claudia Chang
Affiliation:
Sweet Briar College, Department of Anthropology, Sweet Briar, VA 24595
Get access

Abstract

Between the fourth century B.C. and second century A.D., changes in climate, culture and commerce converged to extend networks of influence and intensify social stratification in communities situated along the Silk Road. The horse-riding nomads and agro-pastoralists of what is now Southeastern Kazakhstan were important actors in the unfolding of these events. The settlements and kurgan burials of the Saka and Wusun could be found dotting the alluvial fans north of the Tien Shan Mountains just a short time before Alexander the Great founded outposts in the Ferghana Valley and Chinese emissaries formalized relations with their periphery. In other words, the appearance of Iron Age Saka-Wusun sites anticipated the formation of the Silk Road’s northern branch and subsequently helped mediate long-distance relationships connecting East and West. Historical accounts appear to confirm the presence of the Saka and Wusun in this role, but there is much that remains unknown regarding relationships both within and across their communities. Typological variability in their material culture has fed speculation concerning their position within trade networks, but there has been very little in the way of materials analysis to test the validity of these assumptions.

The ceramics recovered at Tuzusai near Almaty provide an excellent opportunity for examination of the impacts and implications of extended regional contacts throughout the region. Although no Persian or Chinese ceramic imports were identified, an extensive vocabulary of pot forms was locally produced. However, the pottery, particularly pitchers, drinking cups and bowls, and, especially with bright red surface decoration, is found in elaborate burial kurgans. The pottery is coarse, perhaps better called a “rock body” than a clay body, as very little clay is present. The frequency of sherds from the excavation (over 1000) and from surface survey is very low (e.g. 3 surface sherds for one-half days effort) compared with excavations in Southwest Asia or China. Rims are unusually worn. Thus, we suggest pottery was precious and high status, but difficult to make. A local survey of clay resources produced meager results. Tests showed that the finest sediments had perhaps 3% clay-sized particles. Among the adobe houses at Tuzusai is evidence of courtyard work areas for pottery production with fired remains of a possible firing pit or kiln and bone potting tools. Other courtyards were areas for dairying and spinning and some copper alloy and iron metal working. Our aim was to establish the life history, production sequences, status and uses of the pottery. Given our current understanding of local production resources and the technical difficulty associated with the production of thin walled forms using these materials, we suggest that these ceramics were high-status goods, many used in feasting activities, and valued not solely for their function in feasting activities, but for the labor and skill required to produce them. Study of the ceramics, clay sources, production methods, and decoration suggests greater social permeability of Saka-Wusun communities than was previously proposed and allows us to understand the formative dynamics of village along the Silk Road.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Yablonsky, L., in Nomads of the Eurasian Steppe in the Early Iron Age, edited by Davis-Kimball, J., Bashilov, V.A., and Yablonsky, L.T. (Zinat Press, Berkeley,CA, 1995), p. 200.Google Scholar
Akishev, K.A. and Kushaev, G.A., Drenmaya Kul’tura Sakov i Usurtei Doliny Reki Ili. (Nauka, Alma-Ata, 1963).Google Scholar
Chang, C., in The Archaeology of Power and Politics in Eurasia: Regimes and Revolutions, edited by Hartley, C.W., Yazicioglu, G. B., Smith, A.T. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2012) pp. 122142.10.1017/CBO9781139061186.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C., Panyushkina, I.P., Fassbinder, J., Kuhne, L., Heinsch, M., Lyublyanovics, K., Macklin, M., Spengler, R., Toonen, W.H.J., and Tourtellotte, P.A., in press.Google Scholar
Fassbinder, J., personal communication.Google Scholar
Panyushkina, I.P., in press.Google Scholar
Spengler, R.N., Chang, C., Tourtellotte, P.A., J. Field Arch. 38 (1) 6885 (2013).10.1179/0093469012Z.00000000037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, A.M., Chang, C., Grigoriev, F.P. Antiquity. 74, 611–23 (2000).10.1017/S0003598X00059974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spengler, R.N., Chang, C., Tourtellotte, P.A., J. Field Arch. 38 (1) 6885 (2013).10.1179/0093469012Z.00000000037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C., Benecke, N., Grigoriev, F.P., Rosen, A.M., Tourtellotte, P.A., Antiquity. 77 (296) 298312 (2003).10.1017/S0003598X00092280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. and Tourtellotte, P.A., (field report for the 2013 season).Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, O.V., Izvestia, , Seriya Obshestvenni Nauk. 1 (224) 161168 (2000).Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, O.V., pers. comm.Google Scholar
Environment Research Center, Characterization of Ecosystems of Archaeological Excavations Area in Talgar River Basin. (ENVIRC, Almaty, 1995), p. 7.Google Scholar
Machalett, B., Frechen, M., Hambach, U., Oches, E.A., Zoller, L., Marković, S.B., Quarternary Intl. 152-153, 192–201 (2006).Google Scholar
Machalett, B., Frechen, M., Hambach, U., Oches, E.A., Zoller, L., Marković, S.B., Quarternary Intl. 152-153, 192–201 (2006).Google Scholar
Abdrakhimov, D.V., Abdrakimova, E.S., and Abdrakhimov, V.Z., Glass and Ceramics. 56 (5-6) 190-193 (1999).10.1007/BF02681334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R.E. and Guven, N., Bentonites: Geology, mineraology, properties, and uses. (Elsevier, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
Kudailulaova, G. A., Strauss, H., Koeckritz, V., Acta Geodyn. Geomater. 2 (2)[138], 87-93 (2005).Google Scholar
Verbeken, D., Dierckx, S., Dewettinck, K., K., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 63, 1021 (2003).10.1007/s00253-003-1354-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yablonsky, L., in Nomads of the Eurasian Steppe in the Early Iron Age, edited by Davis- Kimball, J., Bashilov, V.A., and Yablonsky, L.T. (Zinat Press, Berkeley,CA, 1995), p. 233.Google Scholar
Jianjun, M., in The Golden Deer of Eurasia: Perspectives on the steppe nomads of the ancient world, ed. Aruz, J., Farkas, A., Fino, E. V. (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2006) 132145.Google Scholar
Grigoriev, F.P., Pozdnakasoi poselenia Tuzusai (Shymkent and Almaty, 1995).Google Scholar