Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:59:10.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Integrated Testing Program for a Near-Field Radionuclide Migration Code

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. Binks ,
A. Fairhurst ,
D. Howarth ,
P. N. Humphreys ,
T. Johnstone ,
M. Jones ,
E. Kelly ,
A. Lee ,
R. Mcgarry  and
M. Randall
...Show all authors
P. Binks
Affiliation:
Company Research Laboratories, BNFL, Springfields Works, Salwick, Preston, UK
A. Fairhurst
Affiliation:
Sellafield Research and Technology, BNFL, Sellafield, Cumbria, UK
D. Howarth
Affiliation:
Sellafield Research and Technology, BNFL, Sellafield, Cumbria, UK
P. N. Humphreys*
Affiliation:
Environmental Assessments, BNFL, Risley, Warrington, UK
T. Johnstone
Affiliation:
Environmental Assessments, BNFL, Risley, Warrington, UK
M. Jones
Affiliation:
Environmental Assessments, BNFL, Risley, Warrington, UK
E. Kelly
Affiliation:
Sellafield Research and Technology, BNFL, Sellafield, Cumbria, UK
A. Lee
Affiliation:
Environmental Assessments, BNFL, Risley, Warrington, UK
R. Mcgarry
Affiliation:
Environmental Assessments, BNFL, Risley, Warrington, UK
M. Randall
Affiliation:
Environmental Assessments, BNFL, Risley, Warrington, UK
D. Smalley
Affiliation:
Environmental Assessments, BNFL, Risley, Warrington, UK
G. Thomson
Affiliation:
Environmental Assessments, BNFL, Risley, Warrington, UK
D. P. Trivedi
Affiliation:
Environmental Assessments, BNFL, Risley, Warrington, UK
*
Corresponding author.
Get access

Abstract

The DRINK code is a 2D, biogeochemical transport code developed as a research tool to simulate the long term evolution of near surface LLW disposal sites and to generate gaseous and liquid source terms for far field studies. The code was recently upgraded to provide a more generic modelling tool with wider application to radionuclide migration scenarios. During the development of this code, the Generalised Repository Model (GRM), an integrated strategy has been employed to ensure the production of a fully tested, verified and quality assured product. This strategy is based around a code development protocol with three main components: quality assurance and documentation, verification and realism testing. Realism testing includes both peer review and model testing, with the latter including: experimental test cases; natural and anthropogenic analogues; field observations and finally uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. This paper describes the successful application of the protocol to the development and testing of the GRM code with specific emphasis upon verification and realism testing.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 506: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI , 1997 , 613
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Humphreys, P. N., Johnstone, T., Trivedi, D. and Hoffmann, A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, p. 211, (1995)Google Scholar
[2] Manton, S., Johnstone, T., Trivedi, D. P., Hoffmann, A. and Humphreys, P. N., Radiochimica Acta, 68, p. 75, (1995)Google Scholar
[3] Humphreys, P., McGarry, R., Hoffmann, A. and Binks, P., FEMS Microbiological Reviews, In Press.Google Scholar
[4]. McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W., Modular, A, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the United States Geological Survey, Book 6, Modelling Techniques, (1988)Google Scholar
[5] Parkhurst, L., Thorstenson, D.C., and Plummer, L. N., PHREEQE-A Computer Program for Geochemical Calculations, (U. S. Geological Survey.) (1988)Google Scholar
[6] Manton, S., Johnstone, T., Trivedi, D., Hoffmann, A., and Humphreys, P. N. in Spectrum 92, Nuclear and Hazardous Waste Management, International Topical Meeting, Boise, Idaho, USA, 2, p. 1463, (1992)Google Scholar
[7]Stumm, W. and Morgan, J.J., Aquatic Chemistry, 2nd Ed. (Wiley International Publications, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
[8] Zehnder, A. J. B. and Stumm, W. in Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms, edited by Zehnder, A. J. B., (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1988), p 1.Google Scholar
[9] Young, A. in Landfill Microbiology, R&D Workshop, edited by Lawson, P. and Alston, Y.R. (Harwell laboratories UKAEA), p. 62.Google Scholar
[10] El-Fadel, M., Findikakis, A. N., Leckie, J. O.. Waste Man. Res. 7, 31 (1989).Google Scholar
[11] Kindred, J. S. and Celia, M., Water Resour. Res. 25, p. 1149 (1989)Google Scholar
[12] Konikow, L. F., and Bredehoeft, J. D., Adv.Wat. Res. 15, 75, (1992)Google Scholar
[13] Anderson, M. P., and Woessner, W. W., Adv.Wat. Res. 15, 167, (1992)Google Scholar
[14] Jackson, C. P., Lever, D. A., and Sumner, P. J., Adv. Wat. Res. 15, 33, (1992)Google Scholar
[15] British Standards Institute, Quality Systems: Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and Servicing. BS EN ISO 9001. Sterling Press. (1994)Google Scholar
[16] Cleary, R. W., Ungs, M. J., PRINCE: Princeton Analytical Models of Flow and Mass Transport, Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (1994)Google Scholar
[17] Beljin, M. S., Heijde, P. K. M. van der, SOLUTE: Analytical Models for Solute Transport in Groundwater, IGWC, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA (1995)Google Scholar
[18] Read, D., CHEMVAL Project: Report on Stages 3 and 4 on the Testing of the Coupled Chemical Transport Models. CEC Report No. EUR 136.75. (1992)Google Scholar
[19] INTRACOIN. INTRACOIN final report level 1, Code Verification. SKI 84:3. Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, Sweden (1984)Google Scholar
[20] Appelo, C. A. J. D. and , Postma, Geochemistry and Groundwater Pollution. A. A. Balkema, Netherlands. (1993)Google Scholar
[21] Rifai, H. S., Bedient, P. B., Borden, R. C. and Haasbeck, J. F., BIOPLUME1 vl.1. Computer Model of Two-Dimensional Contaminant Transport Under the Influence of Oxygen Limited Biodegradation in Groundwater. Version 1.1. National Centre for Ground Water Research, Rice University, Huston, Texas, USA. (1989)Google Scholar
[22] Bolle, W. L., Breugel, J. van, Eybergen, G. C. van, Kossen, N. W. F., and Gils, W. van, Biotechnology and Bioengineering: XXVIII, p. 542, (1986)Google Scholar
[23] Ashley, N. V., Pugh, S. Y. R., Banks, C. J., Humphreys, P. N., Microbial Treatment of Low Level Radioactive Waste. HMIP/RR/92/06. UK DoE, London, UK. (1992)Google Scholar
[24] Holmes, R. G. G., and Rosevear, a., in Gas Generation and Release from Radioactive Waste Repositories, Proceeding of a Workshop Organised by NEA in Co-operation with ANDRA, Aixen-Provence, 23-26 Sept 1991. OECD. (1992)Google Scholar
[25] Fryer, A. E., Schwartz, F. W., Wat. Res. Resour. 30 (12), p. 3455 (1994)Google Scholar
[26] Cross, J. E., Gabriel, D. S., Howarth, A., I, Neretnieks, Sharland, S. M., Tweed, C. J., Modelling of Redox Front and Uranium Movement in a Uranium Mine at Pocos de Caldas, Brazil. NSS/R252, UK NIREX ltd, UK (1991)Google Scholar
[27] Read, D., Atkins, W. S., Geochemical Modelling of the Broubster Natural Analogue Site Caithness, Scotland. EUR-12342, CEC Luxembourg, (1989)Google Scholar
[28] Trivedi, D., Randall, M., Johnstone, T., Serkiz, S., Boltz, D. R., Kaplan, D. I., AGU Transactions, 77 (46), F217. (1996)Google Scholar
[29] Postma, D., Boesen, C., Kritstiansen, H., Larsen, F., Wat. Res. Resour. 27(8). p. 2027 (1991)Google Scholar