Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:48:23.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When, Why and Where are CdTe/CdS Solar Cells Stable?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

K. D. Dobson
Affiliation:
Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Iris Visoly-Fisher
Affiliation:
Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
R. Jayakrishnan
Affiliation:
Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
K. Gartsman
Affiliation:
Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
G. Hodes
Affiliation:
Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
David Cahen
Affiliation:
Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Get access

Abstract

The role of Cu in CdTe/CdS solar cell instability remains the subject of much debate. The investigation of a range of ‘Cu’-contacted CdTe/CdS cells, which had received various thermal stress treatments, is described. Cells that were stressed in air exhibit strong current-voltage (I-V) rollover and junction degradation. No such degradation was observed for ‘Cu’-contacted cells that had been stressed in dry-N2 atmosphere. Cu is found to diffuse rapidly through the cell structure during back contact annealing and to accumulate in the CdS layer. With stress, significant levels of Cu dope the grain bulk, producing (with Cl) high resistance, photoconducting CdS. This behavior is independent of stress atmosphere and is, therefore, unlikely to (initially) be a dominating mechanism for cell degradation. Our results suggest simple air oxidation of the back contact interface to be a likely origin of I-V rollover in CdTe/CdS cells.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dobson, K. D., Visoly-Fisher, I., Hodes, G. and Cahen, D., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 62, 295 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Dobson, K. D., Visoly-Fisher, I., Hodes, G. and Cahen, D., Adv. Mater. (in press).Google Scholar
3. Narayanswamy, C., Gessert, T. A. and Asher, S. E. in, Proc. 15th NCPV Photovoltaics Program Review Meeting, edited by Al-Jassim, M., Thornton, J. P. and Gee, J. M., (AIPCP 462, AIP, Wood-bury NY, 1998) p 248.Google Scholar
4. Batzner, D. L., Romeo, A., Zogg, H., Tiwari, A. N. and Wendt, R., Thin Solid Films 387, 151 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Mahathongdy, Y., M.Sc. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines, 1999.Google Scholar
6. Tsuji, M., Aramoto, T., Ohyama, H., Hibino, T. and Omura, K., J. Cryst. Growth 214, 1142 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Shiraki, Y., Shimada, T. and Komatsubura, K. F., J. Appl. Phys. 45, 3554 (1974).Google Scholar
8. Ramsden, J. J. and Gratzel, M., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 80, 919 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Hartmann, H., Mach, R. and Selle, B., Current Topics in Materials Science; (N. Holland, Amsterdam: 1982; Vol. 9).Google Scholar