Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:28:03.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Representation of Fracture Zone Interpretation Uncertainty in 3D Geological Models of the Mizunami Underground Research Laboratory, Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Matthew J. White
Affiliation:
Galson Sciences Limited, 5 Grosvenor House, Melton Road, Oakham, Rutland, LE15 6AX, UK.
Hiromitsu Saegus
Affiliation:
Tono Geoscience Centre, Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute, 1–63, Yamanouchi, Akeyo-cho, Mizunami-shi, Gifu 509–6132, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute (JNC) is undertaking research into the deep geological environment in Japan in the Tono area of Japan. In the Mizunami Underground Research Laboratory (MIU) Project, located in the Tono area, JNC is carrying out surface-based investigations and will excavate an Underground Research Laboratory (URL) in order to establish comprehensive techniques for investigating and characterising the geological environment. The MIU Project focuses on the investigation of the granitic rocks of the Toki Granite. The geological structure and hydrogeological properties of the Toki Granite are closely affected by the regional fracture zones and faults. The interpretation of these features is undertaken in 3D and directly linked into 3D hydrogeological models. Significant uncertainty exists in the 3D interpretation of the fracture zones, and geologists must make several assumptions regarding the 3D structure in order to develop the 3D interpretation. In order that these assumptions are communicated to the hydrogeologists, a methodology has been developed for representing uncertainty in the 3D geological models. An important part of the uncertainty representation, is the development of a fracture zone classification in which the uncertainty in both the presence and the geometry of the fracture zone is assigned. Other elements include the development of alternative models, visualisation of raw data, development of conceptual models, development of bounding models, and suitable quality assurance and archiving of modelling projects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute (JNC), Master Plan of Mizunami Underground Research Laboratory. JNC Technical Report JNC TN7410 99–008 (1999).Google Scholar
2. White, M. J., Humm, J. P., Todaka, N., Takeuchi, S. and Oyamada, K., GEOMASS: Geological Modelling Analysis and Simulation Software for the Characterisation of Fractured Hard Rock Environments. in Characterization and Evaluation of Sites for Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste in Fractured Rocks Proceedings from The 3rd Äspö International Seminar Oskarsham, June 10–12, 1998, SKB Technical Report TR-98–10, p. 233242 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Saksa, P. and Nummela, J., Geological-structure models used in SR 97. SKB Technical Report TR-98–12 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Tirén, S. A., Comparison of the SKI, SKB and SKN Geological and Structural Models of the Äspö Area. SKI Report 96:19 (1996).Google Scholar