Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:55:01.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observation of Microstructure of Grain Boundaries of ZnO Varistors using Backscattered-electron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Masayuki Takada
Affiliation:
[email protected], Doshisha University, kyotanabe, Japan
Yuuki Sato
Affiliation:
[email protected], Doshisha University, kyotanabe, Japan
Shinzo Yoshikado
Affiliation:
[email protected], Doshisha University, kyotanabe, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The impurities segregated at the grain boundary of ZnO grains, such as Bi2O3, are important factor to obtain the nonlinear voltage-current (V-I ) characteristics of a Bi-added ZnO varistor. The deterioration of V-I characteristics progresses with voltage application. It has been reported that one of the reasons for this deterioration is the movement of oxide ions and interstitial Zn2+ ions across grain boundaries and around the neighborhood of grain boundaries. Thus, the mobility of ions and the pathway of the current formed by voltage application strongly correlate with the structure of grain boundary, such as the crystal orientation of ZnO grains, the phase of Bi2O3 at the grain boundary, and segregated grains. In the present studies, the structure of grain boundary for the ZnO varistor has been evaluated by composition images obtained from energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) with scanning electron microscope (SEM) or with transmission electron microscope (TEM). However, the elemental mapping obtained from EDS with SEM is low resolution and the distribution of elements is obscure. Furthermore, the observation of varistor with TEM is difficult because the sample used for TEM needs precise processing. On the other hand, a composition image with high contrast of tone can be easily obtained using back-scattered electron (BSE) detector with SEM, although BSE detector is lack in the quantitative analysis. In this study, to clarify the microscopic distribution of impurities at the grain boundary with simple method, we observed the fractured surface of ZnO varistor using BSE detector with SEM. For the fractured surface, two types of fracture exist; grain boundary fracture and transcrystalline fracture. The microscopic distribution of impurities can be obtained by observing the surface of grain boundary fracture. The characteristics of ZnO varistor deeply correlate with the state of impurities at the grain boundary such as Bi2O3. To clarify the distribution of these impurities, the fractured surface of Bi-Mn-Co-Sb-added ZnO varistor was observed using SEM, EDS, and BSE detector. It was found that the deposit of Bi2O3 as additive had two types of shape on the surface of grain boundary fracture; spot-like and sheet-like, for Bi-Mn-Co-Sb-added ZnO varistor. With dissolving SiO2 in Bi2O3, the surface tension of Bi2O3 decreased and the sheet-like deposit of Bi2O3 increased, while the spot-like deposit of Bi2O3 decreased. Moreover, when the sample was annealed at 700°C, the surface free energy (surface tension) decreased because Zn2+ and Bi3+ were speculated to become the compound such as Bi7.65 Zn0.35 O11.83 and move to the triple point or line.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Eda, K., J. Appl. Phys., 49, 2964 (1978).Google Scholar
2. Eda, K., Iga, A., and Matuoka, M., J. Appl. Phys., 51, 2678 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Gupta, T. K. and Carlson, W. G., J. Mater. Sci., 20, 3487 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Inada, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 17, 673 (1978).Google Scholar
5. Kobayashi, K., Wada, O., Kobayashi, M., and Takada, Y., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 81, 2071 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Price, C. W., Wright, I. G., and Wallwork, G. R., Metallurgical Transactions. 4, 2423 (1973).Google Scholar
7. Berink, S. and Daneu, N., J. Eu. Ceram. Soc., 21, 1879 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Takada, M. and Yoshikado, S., J. Eu. Ceram. Soc., submittedGoogle Scholar
9. Takada, M. and Yoshikado, S., Proc. 10th. Eu. Ceram. Soc., 507 (2007).Google Scholar
10. Shao, H. Q., Gao, X. H., and Cao, Z. C., J. Eu. Ceram. Soc., 17, 55 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Takada, M. and Yoshikado, S., Key Eng Mater., 388, 7 (2009).Google Scholar