Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:17:02.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monolayer Film of Gold Nanoparticles on a 3 inch or Larger Silicon Wafer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Matthew N. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A.
Sang-Kee Eah
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

We chemically synthesized charged gold nanoparticles coated with hydrophobic organic molecules, which are stable in hexane but unstable in toluene. If a hexane droplet with charged gold nanoparticles is mixed with a larger toluene droplet, they immediately float to the airtoluene interface forming a monolayer of close-packed gold nanoparticles. The monolayer can be deposited to any substrate simply by the solvent molecules' evaporation with no limit in size and without using any sophisticated instrument. As a demonstration, we fabricated a very large monolayer of close-packed gold nanoparticles covering the whole surface of a 3 inch silicon wafer. We further showed that excess organic ligand molecules do not affect the charged gold nanoparticles' property of floating to and forming a monolayer at the air-toluene interface. However, these very slowly evaporating molecules remain on a substrate, affect the two-dimensional ordering, and significantly reduce the contrast in scanning electron microscopy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Heath, J. R., Knobler, C. M., and Leff, D. V., J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 189 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Coe-Sullivan, S., Steckel, J. S., Woo, W.-K., Bawendi, M. G., and Bulović, V., Adv. Funct. Mater. 15, 1117 (2005).Google Scholar
3. Bigioni, T. P., Lin, X. -M., Nguyen, T. T., Corwin, E. I., Witten, T. A., Jaeger, H. M., Nature Mater. 5, 265 (2006).Google Scholar
4. Martin, M. N., Basham, J. I., Chando, P., and Eah, S.-K. (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
5. Brust, M., Walker, M., Bethell, D., Schiffrin, D. J., and Kiely, C., J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 801 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Paul, S., Pearson, C., Molloy, A., Cousins, M. A., Green, M., Kolliopoulou, S., Dimitrakis, P., Normand, P., Tsoukalas, D., and Petty, M. C., Nano Letters 3 (4), 533 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Deegan, R. D., Bakajin, O., Dupont, T. F., Huber, G., Nagel, S. R., and Witten, T. A., Nature 389, 827 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Rabani, E., Reichman, D. R., Geissler, P. L., and Brus, L. E., Nature 426, 271 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Shevchenko, E. V., Talapin, D. V., Kotov, N. A., O'Brien, S., and Murray, C. B., Nature 439, 55 (2006).Google Scholar