Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:39:51.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Germanium-Silicon Separate Absorption and Multiplication Avalanche Photodetectors Fabricated with Low Temperature High Density Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposited Germanium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Malcolm Carroll
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, Photonic Microsystems Technology, P.O. Box 5800, M.S. 1082, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, United States, 505 284 3499
Kent Childs
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, United States
Darwin Serkland
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, United States
Robert Jarecki
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, United States
Todd Bauer
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, United States
Kevin Saiz
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, United States
Get access

Abstract

A desire to monolithically integrate near infrared (NIR) detectors with silicon complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology has motivated many investigations of single crystal germanium on silicon (Ge/Si) diodes [1-3]. Reduction of the epitaxy thermal budget below the typical chemical vapor deposition (CVD) in-situ clean temperature (Tin-situ clean > 780°C) is also increasingly desired to reduce integration complexity. Reduced temperature growth approaches have included p+-Ge/n-Si detectors formed with low temperature poly-Ge (e-beam evaporation) or heavily dislocated single crystal germanium (molecular beam epitaxy, T ~ 450°C), which have had dark currents of ~5 mA/cm2 and responsivities of ~15 mA/W at 1310 nm, despite the large number of defects in and at the Ge/Si interface. Responsivities in these materials are however low and believed to be limited by a small diffusion length (i.e., 5-30 nm [2, 4]) due to fast electron recombination in the defect rich germanium. In this paper, we evaluate a commercially available high density plasma chemical vapor deposition (HDP-CVD) process to grow low temperature (i.e., Tin-situ & Tepitaxy < ~450°C) germanium epitaxy for a p+-Ge/p-Si/n+-Si NIR separate absorption and multiplication avalanche photodetectors (SAM-APD). This device structure is of interest both to examine ways to enhance the responsivity with internal gain as well as to examine alternatives to InGaAs-InP structures for NIR Geiger mode (GM) detection. A silicon avalanche region is highly desirable for GM to reduce after-pulsing effects, which are related to defect density that are smaller in Si than in InP [5]. Despite the high defect densities in the Ge and at the interface, the Ge-Si APDs in this work are found to have relatively low dark count rates in Geiger mode.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Colace, L., Masini, G., and Assanto, G., IEEE J. of Quant. Elec., vol. 35, pp. 1843, 1999.Google Scholar
[2] Bandaru, P., Sahni, S., Yablonovitch, E., Liu, J., Kim, H.-J. & Xie, Y.-H., Mat. Sci. & Eng. B, v 113, 7984, 2004.Google Scholar
[3] Isella, G., Osmond, J., Kummer, M., Kaufmann, R., and Kanel, H. v., Semi. Sci. & Tech., vol. 22, pp. S2628, 2007.Google Scholar
[4] Masini, G., Colace, L., Galluzzi, F., and Assanto, G., Mat. Sci. & Eng. B, vol. 69, pp. 257, 2000.Google Scholar
[5] Laciata, A., Zappa, F., Cova, S., and Lovati, P., Applied Optics, vol. 35, pp. 2986, 1996.Google Scholar
[6] Carroll, M. S., Sheng, J., and Verley, J. C., MRS Proceedings, vol. 934, I0902, 2006.Google Scholar
[7] Suh, Y. S., Carroll, M. S., Levy, R. A., Bisognin, G., Salvador, D. De, Sahiner, M. A., and King, C. A., IEEE Trans. on Elec. Dev., vol. 52, pp. 2416, 2005.Google Scholar
[8] Mooney, P. M., Tilly, L., D'Emic, C. P., Chu, J. O., Cardone, F., LeGoues, F. K., and Meyerson, B. S., J. of Appl. Phys., vol. 82, pp. 688695, 1997.Google Scholar
[9] Kang, Y., Lo, Y.-H., Bitter, M., Kristjansson, S., Pan, Z. & Pauchard, A., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 85, 1668, 2004.Google Scholar