Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:48:29.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancing cell culture in magnetic vesicle gels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Felicity Leng
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Manchester, School of Chemistry and MIB, Manchester, United Kingdom
Julie E Gough
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Manchester, School of Materials, Manchester, United Kingdom
Simon J Webb
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Manchester, School of Chemistry and MIB, Manchester, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Several different hydrogel compositions have been incorporated into magnetic vesicle gels and the resulting “smart” biomaterials assessed as cell culture scaffolds. The compatibility of these hydrogels with the “smart” component of these biomaterials, thermally sensitive vesicles (TSVs) crosslinked by magnetic nanoparticles, was assessed by the leakage of fluorescent 5/6-carboxyfluorescein from the TSVs under cell culture conditions. Subsequently the ability of the hydrogels to support 3T3 fibroblast and chondrocyte viability was assessed. These studies revealed that alginate-based gels were the most compatible with both the TSVs and the cultured cells, with an alginate:fibronectin mix proving to be the most versatile. Nonetheless these studies also suggest that TSV composition needs to be modified to improve the performance of these “smart” cell culture scaffolds in future applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Mart, R.J., Liem, K.P. and Webb, S.J., Chem. Commun., 2287, (2009).Google Scholar
2 Liem, K.P., Mart, R.J. and Webb, S.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc, 129, 12080, (2007).Google Scholar
3 Gu, H., Yang, Z., Gao, J., Chang, C. K., and Xu, B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 34, (2005).Google Scholar
4 Mosahebi, A., Wiberg, M and Terenghi, G., Tissue Eng, 9, 2, 209 (2003).Google Scholar
5 Huang, C.L., Liao, J.D., Yang, C.F., Chang, C.W., Ju, M.S. and Lin, C.C.K., Thin Solid Films 517, 5386 (2009).Google Scholar
6 Khan, F., Tore, R. and Bradley, M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 47, 1, (2008).Google Scholar
7 Rathna, G.V.N., J. Mater. Sci. - Mater. M., 19, 2351 (2008).Google Scholar
8 Suh, J.K. Francis and Matthew, H.W.T., Biomaterials, 21, 2589, (2000).Google Scholar
9 Lin, Y.J., Yen, C.N., Hu, Y.C., Wu, Y.C., Liao, C.J. and Chu., I.M., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 88A, 23, (2009).Google Scholar