Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:19:22.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Signature of Ion-Implantation Induced Defects in n-Silicon in the Defect Cluster Regime Studied using DLTS and Isothermal Transient Spectroscopies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Samarendra P. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur- 208016 INDIA
Vineet Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur- 208016 INDIA
Y. N. Mohapatra
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur- 208016 INDIA
Sanjay Rangan
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania state university, University Park PA 16802 USA
S. Ashok
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania state university, University Park PA 16802 USA
Get access

Abstract

We study electrical signature of defect clusters in KeV Ar ion-implanted n-silicon using Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy (DLTS) and isothermal capacitance spectroscopies such as time analyzed transient spectroscopy (TATS) and high resolution Laplace-DLTS. The samples are annealed at relatively low temperatures of 350 °C - 600 °C at which defect clusters are known to form and evolve. Contrary to the view that few dominant point-defect like traps are associated with defect clusters, our results show that the band gap may be replete with bands of multiple trap states; however their occupation and hence observation depends on experimental conditions dictated by dynamics of carrier capture and emission at these traps. Charge redistribution among multiple states and deepening of effective emission energy with capture are shown to be commonly occurring at these defects. Isothermal transient spectroscopy is shown to be appropriate tool for recognition of some of these features.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Stolk, P. A, Gossman, H. J., Eaglesham, D. J., Jacobson, D. C., Rafferty, C. S., Glimer, G.H., Jaraiz, M., Poate, J. M., Luftman, H. S. and Haynes, T. E., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6031 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Benton, J. L., Libertino, S., Kringhoj, P., Eaglesham, D.J., Poate, J. M. and Coffa, S., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 120 (1997)Google Scholar
3. Giri, P. K., and Mohapatra, Y. N., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 1901 (1998)Google Scholar
4. Cowern, N. E. B., Manino, G., Stolk, P. A., Roozenboom, F., Huizing, H. G. A., Berkum, J. G. M. van, Cristiano, F., Claveri, A. and Jaraiz, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4460 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Agarwal, S., Mohapatra, Y. N. and Singh, V. A., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 3155 (1995)Google Scholar
6. Wesse, J., Computer Physics Communications 69, 99 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Coffa, S., Libertino, S. and Spinella, C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 321 (2000)Google Scholar
8. Giri, P. K., Dhar, S., Kulkarni, V. N. and Mohapatra, Y. N., Phys. Rev. B 57, 14603 (1998)Google Scholar
9. Giri, P. K. and Mohapatra, Y. N.. Phys. Rev. B 62, 16561 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Riedel, F., Hedemann, H. and Schroter, W., Nucl. Instr. & Meth. A 476, 596 (2002)Google Scholar
11. Yelon, A., B., Movaghar and Branz, H. M., Phys. Rev. B 46, 12244 (1992)Google Scholar