Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:28:16.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct atomistic simulation of brittle-to-ductile transition in silicon single crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Dipanjan Sen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Materials Science and Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Alan Cohen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Aidan P. Thompson
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Adri Van Duin
Affiliation:
[email protected], Penn State, College Park, Pennsylvania, United States
William A. Goddard III
Affiliation:
[email protected], Caltech, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Pasadena, California, United States
Markus J Buehler
Affiliation:
[email protected], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Atomistic and Molecular Mechanics, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 77 Mass. Ave, Room 1-235A&B, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, United States
Get access

Abstract

Silicon is an important material not only for semiconductor applications, but also for the development of novel bioinspired and biomimicking materials and structures or drug delivery systems in the context of nanomedicine. For these applications, a thorough understanding of the fracture behavior of the material is critical. In this paper we address this issue by investigating a fundamental issue of the mechanical properties of silicon, its behavior under extreme mechanical loading. Earlier experimental work has shown that at low temperatures, silicon is a brittle material that fractures catastrophically like glass once the applied load exceeds a threshold value. At elevated temperatures, however, the behavior of silicon is ductile. This brittle-to-ductile transition (BDT) has been observed in many experimental studies of single crystals of silicon. However, the mechanisms that lead to this change in behavior remain questionable, and the atomic-scale phenomena are unknown. Here we report for the first time the direct atomistic simulation of the nucleation of dislocations from a crack tip in silicon only due to an increase of the temperature, using large-scale atomistic simulation with the first principles based ReaxFF force field. By raising the temperature in a computational experiment with otherwise identical boundary conditions, we show that the material response changes from brittle cracking to emission of a dislocation at the crack tip, representing evidence for a potential mechanisms of dislocation mediated ductility in silicon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Freund, L. B., Dynamic Fracture Mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).Google Scholar
[2] Broberg, K. B., Cracks and Fracture (Academic Press, 1990).Google Scholar
[3] Hirth, J. P., and Lothe, J., Theory of Dislocations (Wiley-Interscience, 1982).Google Scholar
[4] Rice, J. R., and Thomson, R. M., Phil. Mag. 29, 73 (1974).Google Scholar
[5] Rice, J. R., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 40, 239 (1992).10.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2Google Scholar
[6] Buehler, M. J., and Gao, H., Nature 439, 307 (2006).Google Scholar
[7] Buehler, M. J., Atomistic modeling of materials failure (Springer (New York), 2008).Google Scholar
[8] Gumbsch, P. et al., Science 282, 1293 (1998).Google Scholar
[9] Strachan, A., Cagin, T., and Goddard, W. A., J. Comp.-Aided Mat. Des. 8, 151 (2002).Google Scholar
[10] John, C. S., Philosophical Magazine 32, 1193 (1975).Google Scholar
[11] Khantha, M., and Vitek, V., Acta Materialia 45, 4675 (1997).Google Scholar
[12] Hirsch, P. B., Roberts, S. G., and Samuels, J., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences (1934–1990) 421, 25 (1989).Google Scholar
[13] Hartmaier, A., and Gumbsch, P., Physica status solidi. B. Basic research 202, 1 (1997).10.1002/1521-3951(199708)202:2<R1::AID-PSSB99991>3.0.CO;2-J3.0.CO;2-J>Google Scholar
[14] Xin, Y. B., and Hsia, K. J., Acta Materialia 45, 1747 (1997).Google Scholar
[15] Buehler, M. J. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 165502 (2007).Google Scholar
[16] Deegan, R. D. et al., Phys. Rev. E 67, 066209 (2003).Google Scholar
[17] Bernstein, N., and Hess, D. W., Physical Review Letters 91, 025501 (2003).Google Scholar
[18] Buehler, M. J., Duin, A. C. T. van, and Goddard, W. A. III , Physical review letters 96, 95505 (2006).Google Scholar
[19] Buehler, M. J., Abraham, F. F., and Gao, H., Nature 426, 141 (2003).Google Scholar
[20] Holland, D., and Marder, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 746 (1998).Google Scholar
[21] Duin, A. C. T. v. et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 3803 (2003).Google Scholar
[22] Nomura, K. I. et al., Physical Review Letters 99 (2007).Google Scholar
[23] Plimpton, S., Journal of Computational Physics 117, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
[24] Barrett, M. B. R., et al. Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods (1994).Google Scholar
[25] Hauch, J. A. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3823 (1999).Google Scholar
[26] Rice, J. R., and Beltz, G. B., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 42, 333 (1994).Google Scholar
[27] Duesbery, M. S., and Joos, B., Philosophical Magazine Letters 74, 253 (1996).Google Scholar
[28] Juan, Y. M., and Kaxiras, E., Philosophical Magazine A 74, 1367 (1996).Google Scholar
[29] Chiang, S. W., Carter, C. B., and Kohlstedt, D. L., Phil. Magazine A 42, 103 (1980).10.1080/01418618008239358Google Scholar
[30] Hirsch, P. B., and Roberts, S. G., Philosophical Magazine A 64, 55 (1991).Google Scholar