Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:34:24.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of Granites' Mineral Specific Porosities by PMMA Method and FESEM/EDAX

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2011

Marja Siitari-Kauppi ,
L. Penttinen ,
M. Siitari-Kauppi ,
U. Alanso ,
M. Garcia-Gutierrez ,
T. Missana  and
Alessandro Patelli
Marja Siitari-Kauppi
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Helsinki, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, A.I. Virtasen Aukio, PL 55, Helsinki, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
L. Penttinen
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Helsinki, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, P.O. Box 55, Helsinki, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
M. Siitari-Kauppi
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Helsinki, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, P.O. Box 55, Helsinki, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
U. Alanso
Affiliation:
[email protected], Ciemat, Madrid, N/A, Spain
M. Garcia-Gutierrez
Affiliation:
[email protected], Ciemat, Madrid, N/A, Spain
T. Missana
Affiliation:
[email protected], Ciemat, Madrid, N/A, Spain
Alessandro Patelli
Affiliation:
[email protected], Associazione CIVEN, Via delle Industrie 9, Venezia-Marghera, 30175, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Over extended periods, long-lived radionuclides (RN) or activation products within geologic disposal sites may be released from the fuel and migrate to the geo/biosphere. In the bedrock, contaminants will be transported along fractures by advection and retarded by sorption on mineral surfaces and by molecular diffusion into stagnant pore water in the matrix along a connected system of pores and micro-fissures.

The objective of this paper was to determine the connective porosity and mineral-specific porosities for three granite samples by 14C methylmethacrylate (14C-PMMA) autoradiography. Scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analyses (FESEM/EDAX) were performed in order to study the pore apertures of porous regions in greater detail and to identify the corresponding minerals. Finally, the porosity results were used to evaluate the diffusion coefficients of RNs from previous experiments which determined apparent diffusion coefficients for the main minerals in three granite samples by the Rutherford Backscattering technique.

The total porosity of the Grimsel granite (0.75%) was significantly higher than the porosities of the El Berrocal and Los Ratones granites (0.3%). The porosities of the Grimsel granite feldspars were two to three times higher than the porosities of the El Berrocal and Los Ratones granites' feldspars. However, there was no significant difference between the porosities of the dark minerals. A clear difference was found between the various quartz grains. Quartz crystals were nonporous in the El Berrocal and Los Ratones granites when measured by the PMMA method, but the quartz crystals in the Grimsel granite showed 0.5% intra granular porosity. The apparent diffusion coefficients calculated for uranium diffusion within Grimsel granite on different minerals were very similar (210-13 ± 0.5 m2/s), but differences within both Spanish granites were found from one mineral to another (9 ± 110-14 m2/s in feldspars and 4.5 ± 0.510-14 m2/s in quartz) - always presenting lower diffusion values than in the Grimsel granite.

Keywords

porosityscanning electron microscopy (SEM)Rutherford backscattering (RBS)
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 985: Symposium NN – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXX , 2006 , 0985-NN11-20
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hellmuth, K. H., Siitari-Kauppi, M., and Lindberg, A., Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 13, 403 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Hellmuth, K. H., Lukkarinen, S., and Siitari-Kauppi, M., Isotopenpraxis Environmental Health Studies 30, 47 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Alonso, U., Missana, T., Patelli, A., Ravagnan, J., and Rigato, V., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 207, 195 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Alonso, U., Missana, T., Patelli, A., Rigato, V., and Rivas, P., Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 61, 95 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Bossart, P., and Mazurek, M., Structural Geology and Water-flow paths in the migrationshear- zone Nagra Technical Report NTB 91–12, (1991).Google Scholar
6. Fernandez-Merayo, N., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Montoto, M., Hellmuth, K-H., Radiochimica Acta 74, 211 (1996).Google Scholar