Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:06:33.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anomalous Temperature Dependence of Solvent-Enhanced Dye Diffusion In Polymer Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

T. Graves-Abe ,
F. Pschenitzka  and
J.C. Sturm
T. Graves-Abe
Affiliation:
Center for Photonics and Optoelectronic Materials (POEM), Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
F. Pschenitzka
Affiliation:
Center for Photonics and Optoelectronic Materials (POEM), Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
J.C. Sturm
Affiliation:
Center for Photonics and Optoelectronic Materials (POEM), Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
Get access

Abstract

One promising method to pattern full color polymer Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) displays is to print dye from a pre-patterned organic film onto a spin-cast polymer and then diffuse the dye into the film at room temperature in a solvent vapor environment. This method utilizes the well-known tendency for a polymer film to absorb solvent vapor, which depresses the glass transition temperature of the polymer and dramatically increases diffusion the dye. In this work, we have studied the temperature dependence of this process. The dye coumarin 6 (C6) was transferred onto films consisting of 2-(4-biphenylyl)-5-(4-tert-butylphenyl)- 1,3,4-oxadiazole (PBD) mixed with the polymer poly(9-vinylcarbazole) (PVK). Samples were then placed on a heated stage in a chamber and exposed to acetone vapor to diffuse the C6 into the polymer film. The profile of the diffused dye was determined by depthdependent photoluminescence measurements and Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy. We observed that the amount of diffused dye decreased at higher temperatures, in contrast to conventional thermally-driven diffusion. The results are understood by noting that the decrease in the polymer glass-transition temperature and the corresponding rapid increase in dye diffusivity depend on the quantity of solvent absorbed by the polymer, which decreases as the temperature of the polymer is raised.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 725: Symposium P – Organic and Polymeric Materials and Devices-Optical, Electrical, and Optoelectronic Properties , 2002 , P3.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hebner, T. R. et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 519 (1998). H. Kobayashi et al. Syn. Met. 111, 125 (2000). S.-C. Chang, J. Bhanathan, and Y. Yang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2561 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Pardo, D. A. Jabbour, G. E. and Peyghambarian, N., Adv. Mater. 12, 1249 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Pschenitzka, F. and Sturm, J. C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1913 (1999).F. Pschenitzka and J. C. Sturm. Proc. of SPIE- The Int. Soc. for Opt. Eng. 4105, 59 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Pschenitzka, F. and Sturm, J.C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2584 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Wu, C. C. Lin, S. W., Chen, C. W. and Hsu, J. H.. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1117 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Krevelen, D. W. Van, Properties of Polymers, 3rd ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990).Google Scholar
7. Long, K., Pschenitzka, F., and Sturm, J. C. in Organic Optoelectronic Materials, Processing, and Devices (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 708, Boston, MA 2001) (in press).Google Scholar
8. Pschenitzka, F., PhD. Thesis, Princeton University, 2002.Google Scholar
9. Wu, C. C. Sturm, J. C. Register, R. A., Tian, J., Dana, E. P. and Thompson, M. E. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 44 (8), 1269 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Pearson, J. M. and Stolka, M., Poly(N-vinyl carbazole), (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
11. Shearmur, T.E. et al. Polymer 37, 2695 (1996)Google Scholar
12. Fox, T.G. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 1, 123 (1956)Google Scholar
13. Khang, D.-Y. and Lee, H. H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 870 (2000).Google Scholar