Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:03:40.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anaerobic Corrosion of Steel in Bentonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Nicholas R. Smart
Affiliation:
Serco Assurance, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX14 3ED, United Kingdom.
Andrew P. Rance
Affiliation:
Serco Assurance, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX14 3ED, United Kingdom.
Lars O. Werme
Affiliation:
SKB, Box 5864, SE-10240, Stockholm, Sweden.
Get access

Abstract

In Sweden, spent nuclear fuel will be encapsulated in sealed cylindrical canisters, consisting of a ferrous insert and a copper outer container, for disposal in a geologic repository. Ferrous support structures will also be used in the repository, which will be backfilled with bentonite clay. Once any residual oxygen has been consumed, any ferrous material exposed to anoxic groundwater will undergo anaerobic corrosion, liberating hydrogen, forming a magnetite film, and releasing iron ions into the surrounding matrix. In order to characterise these processes the rate of hydrogen generation of steel in bentonite was measured using a barometric gas cell technique. The initial corrosion rates were found to be higher than measured previously in comparable aqueous solutions, but the long-term corrosion rates were similar. Analysis of the bentonite matrix showed that iron produced by corrosion had penetrated into the bentonite matrix, suggesting that ferrous ion exchange had occurred.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Grim, R.E. and Guven, N., Bentonites, (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1978) p. 126.Google Scholar
2 Grim, R.E., Clay Mineralogy, (McGraw-Hill Publishers, London, 1953) p. 55.Google Scholar
3 Kamei, G., Oda, C., Mitsui, S., Shibata, M. and Shinozaki, T., Engineering Geology 54, 1520 (1999).Google Scholar
4 Smart, N.R., Blackwood, D.J. and Werme, L., Corrosion 58(8), 627 (2002).Google Scholar
5 Rance, A.P., Peat, R. and Smart, N.R., “Analysis of SKB Electrochemistry Cells”, Serco Assurance report SA/SIS/62036/R01 (2003).Google Scholar
6 Smart, N.R., Rance, A.P., Fennell, P.A.H., Werme, L.O., Expansion due to Anaerobic Corrosion of Steel and Cast Iron: Experimental and Natural Analogue Studies, presented at International Workshop Prediction of Long Term Corrosion Behaviour in Nuclear Waste Systems, 26–29 November 2001, Cadarache (2001).Google Scholar
7 Idemitsu, K., Yano, S., Xiaobin, X.. Inagaki, Y., Arima, T., Mitsugashira, T., Hara, M. and Suzuki, Y., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV, edited by McGrail, B.P. and Cragnolino, G.A., (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 713, Warrendale, PA, 2002) pp. 113120.Google Scholar
8 Taniguchi, N., Honda, A., Ishikawa, H. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI, edited by McKinley, I.G. and McCombie, C., (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 506, Warrendale, PA, 1998) pp. 495501.Google Scholar
9 Taniguchi, N., Honda, A., Kawasaki, M. and Tsuru, T., “The Assessment of Corrosion Type and Corrosion Rate of Carbon Steel in Compacted Bentonite”, JNC Report TN8400 99- 003 (in Japanese), 1999.Google Scholar