Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T19:19:05.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulation of Oxygen Diffusion in Ytterbium Disilicate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

Brian S. Good*
Affiliation:
Materials and Structures Division, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH
*
Get access

Abstract

Ytterbium disilicate is of interest as a potential environmental barrier coating for aerospace applications, notably for use in next generation jet turbine engines. In such applications, the transport of oxygen and water vapor through these coatings to the ceramic substrate is undesirable if high temperature oxidation is to be avoided. In an effort to understand the diffusion process in these materials, we have performed kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of vacancy-mediated and interstitial oxygen diffusion in Ytterbium disilicate. Oxygen vacancy and interstitial site energies, vacancy and interstitial formation energies, and migration barrier energies were computed using Density Functional Theory. We have found that, in the case of vacancy-mediated diffusion, many potential diffusion paths involve large barrier energies, but some paths have barrier energies smaller than one electron volt. However, computed vacancy formation energies suggest that the intrinsic vacancy concentration is small. In the case of interstitial diffusion, migration barrier energies are typically around one electron volt, but the interstitial defect formation energies are positive, with the result that the disilicate is unlikely to exhibit experience significant oxygen permeability except at very high temperature.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lee, K. N., Fox, D. S. and Bansal, N. P., J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 25, 2005.Google Scholar
Kohn, W., and Sham, L. J., Physical Review 40 (4A): A1133.Google Scholar
Bocquillon, G., Chateau, C., Loriers, C., AND Loriers, J., J.Solid State Chem. 20, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolin, Y. I. and Shepelev, Y.F., Acta Crystallogr., Sec. B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. 26, 484 (1970).Google Scholar
Voter, A. F., Kinetic Monte Carlo, in Radiation Effects in Solids, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Radiation Effects in Solids, Sickafus, K. E., Kotomin, E. A., Uberuaga, B. P., eds., 123, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007.Google Scholar
Arrhenius, S. A., Physik, Z.. Chem. 4. 96-116 (1889); Shewmon, P. G., ”Diffusion in Solids,” pp 43–65, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, R., Yoon, Y.-G., Srolovitz, D. J. and Car, R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 87, 1821 (2004).Google Scholar
Giannozzi, P., Baroni, S., Bonni, N., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Chiarotti, G. L., Cococcioni, M., Dabo, I., Dal Corso, A., Fabris, S., Fratesi, G., de Gironcoli, S., Gebauer, R., Gerstmann, U., Gougoussis, C., Kokalj, A., Lazzeri, M., Martin-Samos, L., Marzari, N., Mauri, F., Mazzarello, R., Paolini, S., Pasquarello, A., Paulatto, L., Sbraccia, C., Scandolo, S., Sclauzero, G., Seitsonen, A. P., Smogunov, A., Umari, P., Wentzcovitch, R. M., J.Phys.:Condens.Matter, 21, 395502 (2009).Google Scholar
Kresse, G. and Hafner, J., Phys. Rev. B, 47:558, 1993, Rev. B, 49:14251, 1994. Kresse, G. and Furthmüller, J., Comput. Mat. Sci., 6:15, 1996, Phys. Rev. B, 54:11169, 1996.Google Scholar
Perdew, J.P., Chevary, J.A., Vosko, S.H., Jackson, K.A., Pederson, M.R., Singh, D.J., and Fiolhais, C.. Phys. Rev. B, 48:4978, 1993.Google Scholar