Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Studies of Indian organized labour have followed the beaten track for three decades. In their obsessive concern with the political links of trade unions and their control by middle-class intellectuals and professionals, the students of Indian labour have barely paused to consider the social consequences of unionization. The origin of the labour movement in India goes back to the turn of the century, and over five million workers are now unionzed. A movement of this proportion cannot be without consequence for the attitudes and behaviour of workers. In the specifically Indian context the crucial question is how a trade union movement whose very cornerstone, at least ideally, is a sense of camaraderie among a socially diverse workforce interacts with a traditional society whose foundation is the caste system.
This paper is based on fieldwork done for a doctoral thesis. My thanks are due to Professor M. N. Srinivas who supervised this research. I am grateful to B. S. Baviskar and P. N. Mukerji for their comments on this paper.
1 This figure relates to the year 1968 and applies only to registered unions submitting returns to the labour ministry. See Ministry of Labour, The Indian Labour Year Book 1970 (Simla: Labour Bureau, 1972), p. 102.Google Scholar
2 Punekar and Karnik advocate the former view. Giri and Crouch argue the latter. See Punekar, S. D., Trade Unionism in India (Bombay: New Book Co., 1948), p. 129;Google ScholarKarnik, V. B., Indian Trade Unions: A Survey (Bombay: Manaktalas, 1966), p. 220;Google ScholarGiri, V. V., Labour Problems in Indian Industry (Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1958), p. 54;Google ScholarCrouch, Harold, Trade Unions and Politics in India (Bombay: Manaktalas, 1966), pp. 22–3.Google Scholar
3 Morris, David Morris, ‘Caste and the Evolution of the Industrial Workforce in India’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 104, Pt 2 (04 1960), pp. 124–33.Google Scholar
4 Sheth, N. R., The Social Framework of an Indian Factory (Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
5 David, F. Pocock, ‘Sociologies—Urban and Rural’, Contributions to Indian Sociolgy, Vol. 4 (1960), pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
6 Davis, Kingsley, The Population of India and Pakistan (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1951), pp. 73–4.Google Scholar
7 Srinivas, M. N., Social Change in Modern India (Bombay: Allied Publishers, 1966);Google ScholarGhurye, G. S., Caste and Race in India, 5th ed. (Bombay: Popular Prakashan, 1969);Google ScholarHarrision, Selig, India: The Most Dangerous Decades (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Srinivas, M. N., Caste in Modern India (Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1962), p. 72.Google Scholar
9 See, Crouch, , Trade Unions and Politics, p. 140;Google ScholarPunekar, S. D. and Madhuri, S., Trade Union Leadership in India (Bombay: Lalvani, 1967).Google Scholar
10 Gluckman, Max, ‘Anthropological Problems arising from the African Industrial Revolution’, in Southall, Aidan (ed.), Social Change in Modern Africa (London: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
11 Ramaswamy, E. A., ‘Trade Unions and the Electoral Process: General Elections in a Working Class Area’, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 7 (10 1971), pp. 205–26;Google Scholar‘Mid-term Poll in a Working Class Constituency in Tamilnadu’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 7 (05 1972), pp. 1025–8.Google Scholar