Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:46:56.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

James Mill's ‘The History of British India’ and Utilitarianism as a Rhetoric of Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

J. Majeed
J. Majeed
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is about the emergence of new political idioms in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries in Britain, and how this was closely involved with the complexities of British imperial experience in India. In particular, I shall concentrate on the radical rhetoric of Utilitarianism expressed by Jeremy Bentham, and especially by James Mill. This rhetoric was an attack on the revitalized conservatism of the early nineteenth century, which had emerged in response to the threat of the French revolution; but the arena for the struggle between this conservatism and Utilitarianism increasingly became defined in relation to a set of conflicting attitudes towards British involvement in India. These new political languages also involved the formulation of aesthetic attitudes, which were an important component of British views on India. I shall try to show how these attitudes, or what we might call the politics of the imagination, had a lot to do with the defining of cultural identities, with which both political languages were preoccupied.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , May 1990 , pp. 209 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I have taken the phrase ‘the politics of the imagination’ from R. F. Storch's article of that title, Studies in Romanticism (Autumn 1982) 21: 448–56.

2 Marshall, P. J., Bengal: The British Bridgehead. Eastern India 1740–1828. The New Cambridge History of India, II: 2 (Cambridge: CUP, 1988) 129, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 For example, see his letter to Cornwallis, 19 March 1788, letter 485 of The Letters of Sir William Jones, ed. Garland Cannon, 2 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970) 2: 794–6.

4 Bentham, Jeremy, ‘Essay On The Influence Of Time And Place In Matters Of Legislation’, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Bowring, John, 12 vols (1843) 1: 177–81.Google Scholar

5 The Works of Sir William Jones, ed. Jones, A. M. (1799, 6 vols) 6: 313–92.Google Scholar For a discussion of these aspects of the hymns, see Majeed, J., ‘Orientalism, Utilitarianism, and British India:James Mill's The History of British India and the Romantic Orient’, D. Phil. thesis (Oxford, 1988) 68–9.Google Scholar

6 Kopf, David, British Orientalism and the Bengal Renaissance. The Dynamics of Indian Modernization 1773–1835 (Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969) 46–7.Google Scholar

7 Cannon, Garland, ‘Sir William Jones and Edmund Burke’, Modern Philogy 54 (1956–1957): 174.Google Scholar

8 Mill, James, The History of British India, ed. Wilson, H. H., 9 vols (1858) 2: 105; hereafter Mill, HBI.Google Scholar

9 Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legistation, in The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (London: The Atholone Press, 1970) 274.Google Scholar

10 Bentham, Corrigenda for Of Laws in General, in Ibid., 242–4.

11 Mill, , HBI I: viii–xxiii.Google Scholar

12 Forbes, Duncan, ‘James Mill and India’, The Cambridge Journal (1951–1952) 5: 31.Google Scholar

13 For a discussion of these problems, see Harrison, Ross, Bentham (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983) 163; hereafter Harrison.Google Scholar

14 Mill, , HBI 6: 479.Google Scholar

15 Mill, , ‘The Article Colony, reprinted from the Supplement to the Encyclopedia Britannica’, n.d, 31–3.Google Scholar

16 For Mill's comments on the Permanent Settlement embodying ‘aristocratical prejudices’, see HBI 5: 336–48.

17 Jones, , Works 4: 397–561.Google Scholar

18 Hartley, David, Observations on Man, His Frame, His Duty, and His Expectations (1749, 2 vols) 2: 242 et seq.Google Scholar

19 Mill, James, Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind, 2 vols (1828; 1869) ‘With Notes Illustrative and Critical’, ed. Bain, Alexander, Findlater, Andrew, and Grote, George; edited with additional notes by Mill, John Stuart. 1: 242–5; hereafter Mill. The Human Mind.Google Scholar

20 For a discussion of Tooke's theory of language, see Aarsleff, Hans, The Study of Language in England 1780–1860 (1967; The University of Minnesota Press and the Athlone Press, 1983) 44 et seq: for Tooke's influence on Mill, see 93 et seq.Google Scholar

21 Harrison, , 24.Google Scholar

22 Ogden, C. K. (ed.), Bentham's Theory of Fictions (London, 1932) 18.Google Scholar

23 Mill, , The Human Mind 2: 230–7.Google Scholar

24 The clearest exposition of Kant's influence on Coleridge and Wordsworth is by Warnock, Mary, Imagination (London: Faber & Faber.1976) Parts 1–3.Google Scholar

25 Mitter, Partha, Much Malined Monsters. History of European Reactions to Indian Art (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977) 119–22.Google Scholar

26 Mill, , HBI 1: 239.Google Scholar

27 See, for example, HBI I: xvii, 2: 49, 109.

28 Mill, , HBI I: 115.Google Scholar

29 Mill, , HBI 2: 33.Google Scholar

30 Shelley's famous A Defence of Poetry was written in reply to Peacock's essay.

31 Coleridge, S. T., Biographia Literaria (1817; London: J. M. Dent & Sons. 1975) 167.Google Scholar

32 Mill, James, ‘Schools for All, in Preference to Schools for Churchmen Only’, in Burston, W. H. (ed.), James Mill on Education (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969) 158 et seq; hereafter Burston, Mill on Education.Google Scholar

33 Clark, J. C. D., English Society 1688–1832. Ideology, Social Structure and Political Practice During the Ancien Regime (Cambridge: CUP, 1985) 322. However, as my argument tries to show, Clark's contention that Mill's stance in the ‘Essay on Government’ is derived from the patriarchalist idiom of the ancien regime is misplaced.Google Scholar

34 Jeffrey, Francis described Southey as one of the ‘chief champions and apostles’ of the Lake school of poets; The Edinburgh Review (10 1802) I: 63.Google Scholar

35 This argument is developed in the following articles for The Quarterly Review; ‘On the State of the Poor, and the Means Pursued by Society for Bettering their Condition’ (April 1816) 15: 187–235; ‘On the Means of Improving the People’ (April 1818) 19: 79–118; ‘On Emigration’ (March 1828) 37: 539–78. All these appeared in the two volumes of Essays, Moral and Political (1832).

36 ‘A Letter to William Smith, Esq. M.P’ (1817) in Essays. Moral and Political, 2: 14–5.

37 Sir Thomas Moore: Or, Colloquies on the Progress and Prospects of Society (1829; 2 vols) 2: 408–9, 411. A translation of Kant's ‘Idea of a Universal History on a Cosmopolitan Plan’, by de Quincey, appeared in The London Magazine (10 1824) 10: 385–93.

38 For a study of Kant's philosophy of history, see Yovel, Yirmiahu, Kant and the Philosophy of History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

39 Nisbet, Robert, Conservatism: Dream and Reality (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1986) 92.Google Scholar

40 These plans were printed in Lord Teignmouth's Memoirs of the Life. Writings, and Correspondence of Sir William Jones (1804) 475–89.

41 For a discussion of the influence of German Biblical criticism on Coleridge, see Shaffer's, Eleanor‘Kubla Khan’ and the Fall of Jerusalem. The Mythological School in Biblical Criticism and Secular Literature 1770–1880 (Cambridge: CUP, 1975) Chs 1–4.Google Scholar

42 Coleridge, S. T., ‘To Lord Liverpool’, July 28 1817, letter 1072 of Collected Letters of Samuel Taylor Coleridge ed. Griggs, E. L., 6 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959) 4: 761.Google Scholar

43 Mill, , HBI 1: 63–4. 115.Google Scholar

44 Butler, Marilyn, Romantics. Rebels and Reactionaries. English Literature and its Background 1760–1830 (Oxford: OUP, 1981) 78, 130.Google Scholar

45 Coleridge, Hartley, ‘On the Poetical Use of the Heathen Mythology’, London Magazine (02 1822) 5: 113–20.Google Scholar

46 Works, 6: 177–200. For a discussion of these aspects of Jones' work, see Majeed, J., ‘Orientalism, Utilitarianism, and British India’, 66–7; 379–81.Google Scholar

47 The Monthly Magazine and British Register for 1797 (1798) 4: 375–6.

48 ‘Essay on Government’, 21.

49 ‘Essay on Education’, in Burston, (ed.), Mill on Education, 63.Google Scholar

50 Bayly, C. A., Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire. The New Cambridge History of India II. 1 (Cambridge: CUP, 1988) 202 et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 For a discussion of H. H. Wilson's role in the reign of Orientalism in Bengal until the 1830s, see Sirkin, G. and Sirkin, N. R., ‘The Battle of Indian Education: Macaulay's Opening Salvo Newly Discovered’, Victorian Studies (06 1971) 14: 407–28,Google Scholar and ‘John Stuart Mill and Disutilitarianism in Indian Education’, The Journal of General Education (04 1972–01 1973) 24: 231–65.Google Scholar

52 Taylor, Charles, ‘Foucault On Freedom And Truth’, Political Theory (05 1984) 12: 152–83. For a review symposium of Said's Orientalism, see The Journal of Asian Studies (May 1980), 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 al-'Azm, Sadik Jalal, ‘Orientalism and Orientalism in Reverse’, Khamsin, Journal of Revolutionary Socialists of the Middle East (1981) 8: 5–26.Google Scholar

54 Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London: Fontana Press/Collins, 1985) 108.Google Scholar

55 Thomas, William, Mill (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979) 68.Google Scholar

56 For an illuminating discussion of these issues, see Taylor, Charles, Social Theory as Practice (Dehli: OUP, 1983).Google Scholar

57 For a thought-provoking account of these problems, see Parfit, Derek, Reasons and Persons (1984; Oxford: OUP, 1985), esp. part 3.Google Scholar