Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:01:15.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Water and Agriculture in Nineteenth-century Tamilnad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2017

PRASANNAN PARTHASARATHI
PRASANNAN PARTHASARATHI*
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts, United States of America Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With a focus by scholars on states and classes, the environment of India and its impact on agriculture has been neglected, except to provide a context—which was largely unchanging—in which states extracted and classes struggled. One example of environment as the backdrop is the distinction between ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ areas in Tamilnad and South India more widely. This distinction is based on the availability of water and on the local categorization of agricultural activity (nanjai versus punjai). There are two problems with this approach, however. First, it is a narrow treatment of the environment as it neglects other features of the land such as forests, grasslands, scrublands, and other so-called wasteland. Second, it sees the environment as a fixed entity, but the landscape has changed dramatically in the past, especially in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. If changes in the environment are included in the mix, the development of agriculture in nineteenth-century Tamilnad may be seen in some new ways. Agricultural production existed in symbiosis with the complex and varied environment of the region. In the early nineteenth century Tamilnad contained extensive tracts of forests, widespread wastelands, and abundant surface water. This diverse environment made it possible to maintain high levels of agricultural productivity as it provided the resources to maintain the fertility of the soil and the supplies of water that were critical for agricultural enterprise, as well as the well-being of the rural population. The consequences of changing regimes of water is the focus of this article.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 51 , Special Issue 2: New Directions in Social and Economic History: Essays in Honour of David Washbrook , March 2017 , pp. 485 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Maurice Dobb, Studies in the Development of Capitalism (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1946), Irfan Habib, Agrarian System of Mughal India, 1556–1707 (London: Asia Publishing House, 1963), Vladimir Ilyich, Lenin, The Development of Capitalism in Russia: The Process of the Formation of a Home Market for Large Industry (Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1956).

2 Washbrook, David, ‘Country Politics: Madras 1880-1930’, Modern Asian Studies, 7(3) (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, fn. 2, p. 476.

3 Ludden, David, Peasant History in South India (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1985)Google Scholar, pp. 60–3.

4 Baker, Christopher John, An Indian Rural Economy 1880–1955: The Tamilnad Countryside (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)Google Scholar, p. 93.

5 Bandopadhyay, Arun, The Agrarian Economy of Tamilnadu (Calcutta: K. P. Bagchi, 1992)Google Scholar, p. 20.

6 Ibid., p. 31.

7 On occasion lifting devices such as picottahs were used to irrigate with tanks. For example, see the ‘Description of Arrialoor Talook’ in B. S. Ward, ‘Descriptive Memoirs and Registers of Villages of Trichinopoly’, vol. X/2537, pp. 3–4, Africa, Asia and Pacific Collections, British Library, London. This was a costly operation, however, and was undertaken when crops needed water to mature or for watering valuable garden crops.

8 Row, T. Rajaram, Manual of the Ramnad Samastanam (Madurai: Cleghorn Press, 1891)Google Scholar, p. 62.

9 See, for instance, Mosse, David, The Rule of Water: Statecraft, Ecology, and Collective Action in South India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

10 Ludden, Peasant History in South India, pp. 52–3.

11 ‘Place's Report of 1799’, Board's Misc, vol. 45, para 511, Tamil Nadu State Archives, Chennai.

12 Rajaram Row, Manual of the Ramnad Samastanam, p. 78.

13 The figures for the 1820s are from Bandopadhyay, Agrarian Economy of Tamilnadu, pp. 17, 18. Those for the early twentieth century have been calculated from data given in the Imperial Gazetteer of India: Provincial Series, Madras (Calcutta, 1908), vol. 2, p. 11.

14 Imperial Gazetteer of India: Provincial Series, Madras, vols 1 and 2.

15 ‘Some Enquiries into and Account of the State of the Annacathy’, May 1777, p. 15, Mackenzie General, vol. 59, Africa, Asia and Pacific Collections, British Library, London.

16 Baden-Powell, B. H., The Land-Systems of British India being a Manual of the Land-Tenures and of the Systems of Land-Revenue Administration Prevalent in the Several Provinces, 3 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1892)Google Scholar, vol. 3, p. 81. An inam is a gift of land from a superior to an inferior with a total or partial discount of revenue, usually in exchange for some form of service.

17 Sundaraja Iyengar, S., Land Tenures in the Madras Presidency (Madras, 1916), p. 139 Google Scholar.

18 For further details see Parthasarathi, Prasannan, The Transition to a Colonial Economy: Weavers, Merchants and Kings in South India, 1720–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 47–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 ‘Place's Report of 1799’, Board's Misc, vol. 45, para 558.

20 Krishnaswami, S. Y., Rural Problems in Madras (Madras: The Superintendent, Government Press, 1947)Google Scholar, p. 78.

21 Ibid., p. 84.

22 This incident is discussed in Parthasarathi, Transition to a Colonial Economy, p. 46.

23 Bandopadhyay, Agrarian Economy of Tamilnadu.

24 Ludden, Peasant History, pp. 145–6.

25 Mosse, Rule of Water, p. 100.

26 Voelcker, John Augustus, Report on the Improvement of Indian Agriculture (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1893), p. 84 Google Scholar.

27 Ibid., p. 84.

28 Imperial Gazetteer of India: Provincial Series, Madras, vol. 1, p. 531.

29 Bandopadhyay, Agrarian Economy of Tamilnadu, p. 46.

30 Benson, Charles, Report of a Tour in the Trichinopoly District (Madras, 1879), p. 62 Google Scholar.

31 ‘Preliminary Report on Irrigation under wells in the Madras Presidency’, in Preliminary Report on the Investigation of Protective Irrigation Works, and on Irrigation under wells, in the Madras Presidency by H. E. Clerk (Madras, 1902), p. 20.

32 Benson, Tour in the Trichinopoly District, p. 62.

33 ‘Preliminary Report on Irrigation under wells in the Madras Presidency’, p. 2.

34 Baker, Indian Rural Economy, p. 478.

35 Benson, Tour in the Trichinopoly District, p. 62.

36 Report of the Agricultural Committee, Appointed by G. O. No. 686, Dated 25th September 1888 (Madras, 1889), pp. 6 and 153–4.

37 Imperial Gazetteer of India: Provincial Series, Madras, vol. 1, p. 530.

38 Baker, Indian Rural Economy, p. 478.

39 Benson, Tour in the Trichinopoly District, p. 64.

40 Report of the Agricultural Committee, Appointed by G. O. No. 686, p. 89.

41 Chatterton, Alfred, Lift Irrigation (Madras, 1907)Google Scholar.

42 Imperial Gazetteer of India: Provincial Series, Madras, vol. 1, p. 530.

43 Wrigley, E. A., Continuity, Chance and Change: The Character of the Industrial Revolution in England (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Report of the Committee Appointed under the Famine Commission to Enquire into the Management of Irrigation Works in Madras, Orissa, and Midnapur (Calcutta, 1879), p. 3.

45 For more on this, see Kapil Subramanian, ‘Revisiting the Green Revolution: Irrigation and Food Production in Twentieth-century India’, PhD thesis, King's College London, 2015.