Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:58:42.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Volatility of oxides from silicate melt and the origin of moldavites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

J. Konta  and
L. MráZ
J. Konta
Affiliation:
Department of Petrology, Charles University, Albertov 6, Prague 2, Czechoslovakia
L. MráZ
Affiliation:
Department of Petrology, Charles University, Albertov 6, Prague 2, Czechoslovakia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The volatilities of SiO2, Na2O, and Fe2O31 increase with increasing thermal function within the range 1600 to 2100°C during the melting of a sandy-silty clay. The remaining melt is to some extent enriched in Al2O3, K2O, CaO, and MgO. Chemical analyses of the sandy-silty clay, of the glasses melted from the latter, of the silicate material evaporated and newly condensed and their correlation with increasing thermal function and bulk density of glasses, as well as with the hitherto known quantitative data on moldavites, testify to the fact that in moldavites evaporated and newly condensed silicate material substantially prevails over material that passed directly from a solid to a fluid state. Evaporation of the silicate material from the rocks of the impact crater caused a significant change in relations between major oxides compared to the original relations in the source rocks. Thus, the hypothesis that tektites are directly remelted rocks of the Earth's crust, based on over-all chemical similarities of tektites and some rocks in major oxides, appears incorrect.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 40 , Issue 309 , March 1975 , pp. 70 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, (J. A. S.), Osmond, (J. K.), and Rogers, (J. J. W.), 1959. Phys. Chem. Earth, 3, 298-348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, (V. E.), 1964. Geoehimiea Acre, 28, 893–913 [M.A. 17-61].Google Scholar
Barnes, (V. E.), 1968. Tektites. Repr. from International Dictionary of Geophysics, 1–12. Oxford (Pergamon).Google Scholar
Barnes, (V. E.), 1969. Geochimica Acta, 33, 1121-3 [M.A. 21-560].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouška, (V.), 1968. Lithos, 102-12 [M.A. 20-495].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouška, (V.), Faul, (H.), and Naeser, (C. W.), 1968. Acta Univ. Carol., ser. geol., 277-86 [M.A. 21-2479].Google Scholar
Bouška, (V.), and Povondra, , 1964. Geochimica Acre, 28, 783-91 [M.A. 17-295].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouška, (V.), 1966. Chemické složenf vltavínů (Chemical composition of moldavites), Časopis miner. geol., 11, 89–97 (Praha).Google Scholar
Chapman, (D. R.) and Schemer, (L. C.), 1969. Journ. Geophys. Res. 74, 6737-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faul, (H.), 1966. Science, 152, 1341-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, (W.), 1971. Abstracts of the Meteoritical Soc. 34th Ann. Meeting, Tübingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Gentner, (W.), Lippolt, (H. J.), and Schaefrer, (O. A.), 1963. Geochimica Acta, 27, 191–200 [M.A. 16-277].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenland, (L.) and Lovering, (J. F.), 1965. Ibid. 29, 563-7 [M.A. 17-688].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heide, (F.), 1961. Acta Geol. Ae. Sci. Hunger., 7, fasc. 1-2, 105-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konta, (J.), 1966. Aeta Univ. Carol., ser. geol., 81-97 [M.A. 19-44].Google Scholar
Konta, (J.), 1971a. Abstracts of the Meteoritical Soc. 34th Ann. Meeting, Tübingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Konta, (J.), 1971b. Min. Mag. 38, 408-17 [M.A. 23-447].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konta, (J.), 1971c. Acta Univ. Carol., ser. geol., 299-308.Google Scholar
Konta, (J.), 1972. Ibid. 31-45.Google Scholar
Konta, (J.), and Mráz, (L.), 1969. Geochimica Acta, 33, 1103-11 [M.A. 21-559].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, (I.) and Lovering, (J. F.), 1969. Ibid. 33, 1057-70 [M.A. 21-562].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'keefe, (J. A.), 1966. Space Sci. Reviews, 6, No. 2, 174–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpotts, (J. A.) and Pinson, (W. H.), 1966. Geochimiea Acta, 30, 253-66 [M.A. 18-37].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinson, (W. H.) and Schnetzler, (C. C.), 1962. Nature, 193, 233-4 [M.A. 16-55].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rost, (R.), 1964. Geochimica Acta, 28, 931-6 [M.A. 17-62].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rost, (R.), 1966. Sbornik Ndrod. musea v Praze, 22, B, 169-91.Google Scholar
Rost, (R.), 1967. Acta Univ. Carol., ser. geol., 95-112 [M.A. 19-214].Google Scholar
Rost, (R.), 1972. Vltavíny a tektity (Moldavites and Tektites). Praha (Academia Press), 241.Google Scholar
Schnetzler, (C. C.) and Prnson, (W. H.), 1963. Tektites (Ed. O'keefe), Ch. 4, 95-129. Univ. Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, (L. J.), 1933. Nature, 131, 117-18 [M.A. 5-304].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Störr, (M.) and Konta, (J.), 1964. Chemie der Erde, 259-78 [M.A. 17-294].Google Scholar
Taylor, (S. R.), 1966. Geochimica Acta, 30, 1121-36 [M.A. 18-II3].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, (S. R.), and Sacias, (M.), 1964. Ibid. 28, 235-64 [M.A. 16-641].Google Scholar
Walter, (L. S.), 1967. Ibid. 31, 2043-63 [M.A. 19-214].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, (L. S.), and Carron, (M. K.), 1964. Geochimica Acta, 28, 937-51 [M.A. 17-61].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zähringer, (J.), 1963. Tektites (Ed. O'keere), 137-49. Univ. Chicago Press.Google Scholar