Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:34:12.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental crystallization of chevkinite/perrierite from REE-enriched silicate liquids at high pressure and temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

T. H. Green  and
N. J. Pearson
T. H. Green
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia
N. J. Pearson
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chevkinite/perrierite crystallized from a series of REE-enriched compositions, ranging from basalt through andesite to rhyolite at pressures from 7.5 to 20 kbar and temperatures from 900–1050°C. The Al2O3 content increased with increasing pressure, but no other consistent composition change was observed with pressure and temperature variation in this range. The REE partition pattern consistently favoured light over heavy REE, with a regular decrease in partition coefficients (D) from La through to Lu. D values increase with decreasing temperature and decreasing REE content (i.e. Henry's Law does not apply, as REE are essential structural constituents of chevkinite/perrierite), but appear unaffected by pressure and fo2. Chevkinite/perrierite may be a significant fractionating phase in evolving silicic magmas, or a residual phase from low degrees of partial melting of granulites. In both these circumstances it will exert a major control on the REE content of derivative liquids.

Keywords

chevkiniteperrieriterare earth elementssilicate liquids
Type
Mineralogy
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 52 , Issue 364 , March 1988 , pp. 113 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Paolo, D.J., Manton, W.I., Grew, E.S., and Halpern, M. (1982) Nature 298, 614–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, M.J., and Weill, D.F. (1972) Chem. Geol. 10, 179-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewart, A. (1981) J. Geophys. Res. 86, 10242–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewart, A. (1982) J. Petrol. 23, 344–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exley, R.A. (1980) Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 48, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, J.B. (1970) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 27, 179-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T.H., and Pearson, N.J. (1985) Ibid. 91, 2436.Google Scholar
Green, T.H., and Pearson, N.J. (1986a) Chem. Geol. 55, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T.H., and Pearson, N.J. (1986b) Ibid. 56, 105-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T.H., and Pearson, N.J. Ringwood, A.E., and Major, A. (1966) J. Geophys. Res. 71, 358-99.Google Scholar
Haggerty, S.E., and Mariano, A.N. (1983) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 84, 365–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, G.N., and Langmuir, C.H. (1978) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 42, 725–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, A.R., Merriman, R.J., and Nancarrow, P.H. A. (1982) Mineral. Mag. 46, 449–52.Google Scholar
Izett, G.A., and Wilcox, R.E. (1968) Am. Mineral. 53, 1558–67.Google Scholar
Jaffe, H.W., Evans, H.T. Jr., and Chapman, R.W. (1956) Ibid. 41, 474–87.Google Scholar
McDowell, S.D. (1979) Ibid. 64, 721–7.Google Scholar
Miller, C.F., and Mittlefehldt, D.W. (1982) Geol. 10, 129–33.2.0.CO;2>CrossRef2.0.CO;2>Google Scholar
Segalstad, T.V., and Larsen, A.O. (1978) Am. Mineral. 63, 499–505.Google Scholar
Shannon, R.D., and Prewitt, C.T. (1969) Acta Crystaltogr. 25, 925–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, S.-S., and Hanson, G.N. (1975) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 52, 771-06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, M.J. (1984) Mineral. Mag. 48, 553–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, E.B., and Green, T.H. (1981) Earth Planet. Sei. Lett. 56, 405–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar