Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:01:30.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High Resolution Imaging Using Confocal and 2-photon Molecular Excitation Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

M.B. Cannell  and
C. Soeller
M.B. Cannell
Affiliation:
St. George's Hospital Medical School, London
C. Soeller
Affiliation:
St. George's Hospital Medical School, London

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fluorescence microscopy has proved to be an invaluable tool for biomedical science since it is possible to visualise small quantities of labelled materials (such as intracellular ions and proteins) in both fixed and living cells. However, the conventional wide field fluorescence microscope suffers from the disadvantage that objects outside the focal plane also fluoresce (in response to the excitation light) and this leads to a marked loss of contrast for objects in the focal plane. This is especially a problem when the fluorescent probe is distributed throughout the thickness of the cell and the cell is thicker than about 1 μm. The confocal microscope overcomes this problem by illuminating the preparation with a point source of excitation light and limiting the collection of light with a pinhole that is confocal with the illumination source. This converts the microscope from an imaging system to a point detector and images are produced by scanning the illuminating and detecting point over the specimen to build an image (in much the same way that a television set produces an image). The basic idea behind the confocal system is shown in Figure 1, and it should be noted that light from points outside the focal plane is defocused at the pinhole and so does not pass through the pinhole efficiently.

Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy Today , Volume 8 , Issue 5 , June 2000 , pp. 20 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2000

References

Bers, D. M. 1991, Excitation-contraction coupling and cardiac contractile force. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Cannell, M. B., Cheng, H., and Lederer, W.J.. 1995. The control of calcium release in heart muscle. Science 268:1045-1050.Google Scholar
Cannell, M. B., H., Cheng, and W.J., Lederer, 1994, Spatial non-uniformities in [Ca2+]i during excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac myocytes. Biophys. J. 67:1942-1956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, H., Lederer, W. J., and Cannell, M. B. 1993. Calcium sparks: Elementary events underlying excitation-contraction coupling in heart muscle, Science 262:740-744,CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, H., Lederer, W. J, and Cannell, M. B.. 1994. Propagation of excitationcontraction coupling into ventricular ceils. Pflugers Archiv. 428: 415-417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denk, W., J. H., Strickler, and Webb, W. W.. 1990. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy, Science 248:73-76.Google Scholar
Lopez-Lopez, J. R, Shacklock, P. S., Balke, C. W., and Wier, W. G. 1995. Local calcium transients triggered by singie L-type calcium channel currents in cardiac cells. Science 268:1042-1045,Google Scholar
Pawley, J.B. [ed.]. 1995, Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. 2nd ed. Plenum Press, N.Y,Google Scholar
Soeller, C., and Cannell, M. B.. 1996. Construction of a two-photon microscope and optimisation of illumination pulse duration. Pfiugers Arch. 432:555-561.Google Scholar
Sommer, J. R. and Waugh, R. A.. 1976. The ultrastructure of the mammalian cardiac cell - with special reference on the tubular membrane systems. Am. J. Pathology 62:192-232.Google Scholar
Xu, C., and Webb, W. W.. 1996. Measurement of two-photon excitation cross sections of molecular fluorophores with data from 690 to 1050 nm. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 13:481-491.Google Scholar