Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:35:45.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray Energy-Dispersive Spectrometry During In Situ Liquid Cell Studies Using an Analytical Electron Microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2014

Nestor J. Zaluzec ,
M. Grace Burke ,
Sarah J. Haigh  and
Matthew A. Kulzick
Nestor J. Zaluzec*
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Electron Microscopy Center, Argonne, IL 60439, USA School of Materials, Materials Performance Centre and Electron Microscopy Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
M. Grace Burke
Affiliation:
School of Materials, Materials Performance Centre and Electron Microscopy Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Sarah J. Haigh
Affiliation:
School of Materials, Materials Performance Centre and Electron Microscopy Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Matthew A. Kulzick
Affiliation:
BP Corporate Research Center, Naperville, IL 60563, USA
*
*Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The use of analytical spectroscopies during scanning/transmission electron microscope (S/TEM) investigations of micro- and nano-scale structures has become a routine technique in the arsenal of tools available to today’s materials researchers. Essential to implementation and successful application of spectroscopy to characterization is the integration of numerous technologies, which include electron optics, specimen holders, and associated detectors. While this combination has been achieved in many instrument configurations, the integration of X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy and in situ liquid environmental cells in the S/TEM has to date been elusive. In this work we present the successful incorporation/modifications to a system that achieves this functionality for analytical electron microscopy.

Keywords

liquid cellXEDSEELSmicroanalysiseCellSTEMTEMAEMspectroscopyin situ
Type
In Situ Special Section
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 323 - 329
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chenna, S. & Crozer, P.A. (2011). Operando TEM—Detection of gas phase catalysis in an environmental TEM with EELS. Microsc Microanal 17(Suppl 2), 476–477.Google Scholar
Crewe, A.V. (1971). High resolution scanning microscopy of biological specimens. Philos Trans R Soc B 261, 61–70.Google Scholar
Crozer, P.A. & Chenna, S. (2011). In situ analysis of gas composition by electron energy-loss spectroscopy for environmental transmission electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 111, 177–185.Google Scholar
de Jonge, N. & Ross, F.M. (2011). Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat Nanotechnol 6, 695–704.Google Scholar
Egerton, R.F. (1986). Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy. NewYork: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, H.L., Klenov, D.O., Wang, Y.C., Cheng, H. & Zaluzec, N.J. (2011). On the performance of XEDS and EELS in the AEM: 25 years later. Microsc Microanal 17(Suppl 2), 590–591, doi:10.1017/S1431927611003825.Google Scholar
Holtz, M.E., Yu, Y., Gao, J., Abruña, H.D. & Muller, D.A. (2013). In situ electron energy-loss spectroscopy in liquids. Microsc Microanal 19, 1027–1035.Google Scholar
Howie, A. (1979). Image-contrast and localized signal selection techniques. J Microsc 117, 11–23.Google Scholar
Jungjohann, K.L., Evans, J.E., Aguiar, J.A., Arslan, I. & Browning, N.D. (2012). Atomic-scale imaging and spectroscopy for in situ liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Microanal 18, 621–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, K.L., Wu, C.C., Huang, Y.J., Pang, H.L., Chang, H.Y., Chang, P., Hsu, L. & Yew, T.R. (2008). Novel microchip for in situ TEM imaging of living organisms and bio-reactions in aqueous conditions. Lab Chip 8, 1915–1921.Google Scholar
Malis, T., Cheng, S.C. & Egerton, R.F. (1988). EELS log-ratio technique for specimen-thickness measurement in the TEM. J Elec Micro Tech 8, 193–200.Google Scholar
Pennycook, S.J. (2012). Seeing the atoms more clearly: STEM imaging from the Crewe era to today. Ultramicroscopy 123, 28–37.Google Scholar
Ring, E.A. & de Jonge, N. (2010). Microfluidic system for transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Microanal 16, 622–629.Google Scholar
Symposium on New Opportunities for In-Situ (2013). New opportunities for in situ techniques and instruments. Microsc Microanal 19(Suppl 2), 392–476.Google Scholar
Williams, D.B. & Carter, C.B. (2009). Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Textbook for Materials Science. USA: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Zaluzec, N.J. (1979). Introduction to Analytical Electron Microscopy. New York: Plenum Press, Chapter 4, 121–168.Google Scholar
Zaluzec, N.J. (2009). Detector solid angle formulas for use in X-ray energy dispersive spectrometry. Microsc Microanal 15, 93–98.Google Scholar